View Single Post
  #6  
Old 04-25-2005, 07:45 AM
shr0olvl's Avatar
shr0olvl shr0olvl is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,237
Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by danno
why not?

it sounds a bit silly to me. you have the option of a controller with a cord, or a controller without the cord. both do exactly the same job, look the same, perform the same, etc. except with one you dont have a whole pile of cords hanging around.
I don't like wireless controllers because they don't respond as kick as the ones with a cord and they can be laggy sometime. Thats why I try to stay away from anything wireless.
Reply With Quote