
03-08-2006, 03:54 AM
|
 |
le mans recovery mode =ON
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,274
nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stian1979
This Prototype named 96-5.3-01 (year-version-number) was first started up on the Queens Birthday 1996. WOW. the years in australia is long.
|
Please go back and read wher I pointed out that a clever patentee will add additional claims on an on-going basis forcing the patent BACK into application state and not requiring publishing !!
MANY years. One of mine was filed in 2001, the compamy keeps adding a few things and it MAY get published next year ( we're running out of new ideas around the basic concept )
Quote:
|
Patents on what by the way? Cams are invented, gear for contrarotating is invented and the pistion concept is invented. Used by Yoke befour.
|
HOW you use something is patentable even if the thing was patented before.
How you use a feature to deliver some NEW capability - additional power or efficiency is also patentable. So I can apply for a patent to use a micro revetec engine (say) to power a next generation laptop The engine existed, the laptop existed, my patenn would be for the application !! Anyone writing a patent themself tries to cover ALL those eventualities before it is published. Again, if you go back to what I said earlier post abotu patents then you will understand better.
Quote:
So it's not to late to late to apply the patent for usage off the weel yet?
WOW
|
THAT is a correct statement IF you ahve some new applicaiton of the wheel. If you can find a way to use a wheel to cure cancer then you can patent it. You can't manage to patent it to move a vehicle ( Interestingly in nano technology there are patent filings abotu nano-hweels, motors etc )
only if you are smart enough to INVENT, smart enough to write a cast iron patent for a valuable application AND smart enough to spell
Quote:
If a engine produce 400Nm at 3000RPM and is converted to a revetec design and then produce 3 times the torque..........................Revetec say they produce 3 times the torque, but the same power?
I find that sounding like a back yard mecanic from Texas.
|
You sir don't understand engines 
On YOUR assumption then a long stroke engine with higher torque output should ALSO produce higher power than the same engine with shorter stroke/larger bore .... PS: They dont 
Quote:
Sorry guys
I don't buy it.
|
That's OK, we're not asking you to.
Pearls before swine 
__________________
___ธ๘คบฐจธ๘คบฐจจฐบค๘
-/ดฏ/)
//
//
/---/
/ดฏ/' --'/ดฏฏ`ทธ
/'/--/././จฏ\
('(ดด ฏ./'')
-\---'-/
--\ _.ทด
--\-----
|