LOL...
My comments on the VE were my own opinion. The cars definatley a VE in the pictures, and theres a chance that it will change. But for now, thats what it looks like. So i took my conclusion of it being boring from what I saw. I will stress that i NEVER called it ugly. In fact I said that it was a very good looking car...just not a very exciting design. Audi's look good. Theres nothing exciting about the design though. It just looks right. Same with the VE. Theres nothing wrong with what i said.
And can i ask why you are bringing up the VE in relation to the comments i made on orion earlier? Ive seen the VE, like the overall look, but dont find it exciting. I have the right to say my opinion and looking at the poll i have many people that share my opinion.
And for the thousandth time, I DIDNT SAY THE CAR WAS AWSOME!!!
I SAID: Falcon + Iosis = Awsome.
It means that a falcon with iosis influences would look awsome. I didnt call the actual car awsome because i havent seen it. y point was that an Iosis influenced family car would be pretty awsome (assuming they didnt chuck an AU all over again) and judging by Ford Oz's recent design jobs(excluding that refreshed escape... *vomits*), I am expecting a pretty good looking falcon in 2008.
If i had said plainly "the orion falcon is awsome" then i would have looked like a dickhead. But i didnt say that. Im pretty confident that there will be iosis influence (we've been hearing about an iosis/ falcon since the iosis was first shown). Its still not enough, but its something. Thats why i showed an addition to identify what was awsome. A falcon PLUS iosis influences is awsome. Simple maths tells me that iosis plus falcon = iosis fused with a falcon.
Falcon + iosis does not equal FALCON.
(Feel free to flame me for continuing this
....but i couldnt leave it without further explanation)
adrenaline OUT