[Wonderer]

[quote]

Originally Posted by CHOOK

Thanks for clarifying your background. The 40 pages of this thread are full of idiots just coming in, putting sh!t on the engine and disappearing. It appeared that you were another one of those idiots. Maybe you should have clarified your position rather than coming in with one post and demanding answers that have already been addressed.

Arn't YOU taking it a tad too personal Mr Chook. Just becuase I have a cooler profile name then you (Wonderer vs Chook) there is no need to get personal.

A couple of responses.

Yep. Valid point. That is how all potential clients from any number of Hybid drivetrain companies in the Northern hemisphere contact a potential engine designer that they want to do business with; over the internet on a forum
For your information, the website is www.revetec.com
There you will find contact details including telephone numbers and email addresses.

Thankfully YOU dont work for RVC otherwise this comment of yours would be taken differently. Best be careful what is said chicken/chook?

Maybe you should look at the history a little more closely since REVETEC first listed. Look at the share price movement as well as shares sold over the last three months. As a shareholder, I have watched closely every day since they listed and noticed every movement as well as the depth. Up to three months ago there was very little action and the share price was 4c. Thank you to those that sold That was roughly the bottom of the trough and the time things started to move slightly. It hasn't looked like anyone would get them again at that price since. Quite a few went up to 6.5c but have now retraced slightly to 5c but only the very patient have managed to get some but very few. Also remember that they are on the NSX not the ASX, so RVC are not on the major trading exchange as yet. 5c may look little to you but as I said, a $10M market cap looks fair at this stage IMO.

My point was that a drop from 40 cents to 5 cents is reflective of the support and respect that investors have with this company. You cant argue this.

This is not incorrect. Read the threads again for these particular participants.
Manolis wants REVETEC to fail. He has a competitve engine (ie. Pattakon) that he has tried to drum into anyone that wants to listen on this forum and every other auto forum on the web that his engine is the best engine design ever invented. It would be interesting to hear your comments on the Pattakon.

Manolis did question your ability.

Pneumatic is an engineer and Hightower is a school kid who both started off rubbishing the engine but seem to be a little more patient and understanding now after Brad explained similar questions that you asked.

Wrong, Hightower is for starters not a high school student, he says he is but I am telling you he is not. Secondly if it wasn't for Santo/Santos & Chookie & Matre then Pneumatic and Hightower would be screaming down RVC's throat.

The one similarity to all three is that none are shareholders of RVC. They have an interest in engine designs but have criticised REVETEC without knowing the full mechanics. Brad does not have to answer to them; especially on a forum and especially not the timing of the project or potential deals. That is what AGMs and the stock exchange are used for

This forum is designed for open dialogue and commentary. Any question can be asked, there are specific tech questions which Brad has failed to answer based on his excuse that he needs to keep it secret. I understand this however, my point simply is that he has taken too long to get his engine to this satge. Period.

These are some of the the partners REVETEC have:
SKF (Bearings and Seals), Elf (Lubrication and Cooling), Recoil (Thread Inserts), Haltech (Engine Management Systems), Broens (machining), Electrosil (cylinder coatings).
Here are more details on their website http://www.revetec.com/?q=taxonomy/term/18
Brad will have to provide other details if you need more than that.

Yes, the list of SUPPLIERS above is interesting, I am surprised you didn't list the newsagent and the hardware store that supply RVC with paper clips and nails. There is nothing strategic from my research.

Very valid point. Does it not seem to you that they are now in the final stages of getting proper independant testing and ready for production? I don't think REVETEC were just sitting back soaking up the Gold Coast sun waiting for things to happen over the past 10 years. I also don't think that they are expecting the engine to be online in 4 years. I believe they are expecting a production engine later this year or early next year. Read the thread again

You cant be serious, a production engine ready by the end of this year/early next year. Impossible. Unless of course the engine has already been completed, and has undergone durability testing, environmental differential testing, NVH testing etc etc. Based on what Brad has said he is nowhere near this point, so please do not speak on Brad's (?) behalf regarding engine development milestones.