
04-23-2008, 11:03 AM
|
 |
Enthusiast
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,855
|
|
Consider the implications when lower government is allowed to derive income through 'aggressive' traffic enforcement. (ie speed traps)
Quote:
A study just released from George Mason University’s economics department .. detail[s] a number of facts:
Police officers report to a Chief of Police who is appointed by government officials.
Government officials are elected with the major responsibilities of assessment of taxes and appointment of town officials.
There is a positive relationship between police budgets and traffic fines.
Police salaries for officers and sergeants increase with the size of the police budget.
Police personnel budget increases with fine and forfeiture revenues.
In Massachusetts, where the study was conducted, there are limitations on the revenue municipalities can raise through fees, licenses and permits, but there is no statute or regulation on fines. Furthermore, municipalities retain 50 percent of the revenues collected from traffic fines.
|
|