[Revetec Raptor]

Originally Posted by revetec

Dear Raptor,

I think these type of questions are most suitable to be sent to me in an email. This is because this is a technical forum on the technology, not a bulletin board or Shareholder information resource for Revetec.

If I treated it as a bulletin Board or a Shareholder information resource outlet, I think the Administrators to Ultimatecarpage.com would not like it. I would like to adhere to their guidelines and remain an active poster in these pages.

This is simply semantics when it suits Revetec ! (a bit like a wheel stand, sounds good - means nothing)
Drop the conspiracy theory by blaming others on the inability of Revetec to market itself professionally.

Another reason is that I am not going to discuss on forums what our company strategy is, and why we do what we do, and when.

Many many companies announce what their business strategies are to the public. Stop hiding behind what appears to be fast becoming 'welfare recipient technology'.
Pouting to this forum that you are only spending a few hours setting up the heads & 15 minutes to set up the new piston configurations, just prior to spending $50`000 for Orbital to test the engine, makes Revetec appear incompetent & brain dead ...to say the least.
If/when the money dries up from the government grant or John L, I wonder what will become of Revetec !

Any company questions other than technical ones maybe sent to me via email from our website.

On the website we see old photos of a Revetec engine being fitted into a vehicle. I/ we have introduced hundreds of people to the Revetec technology and have found that most people are not stupid to understanding technology. The two most common questions are, "is it like a Rotary engine" or "has it been tested in a vehicle" !
So, why have we not heard of any engine reliability feedback ? An engine in a trike doing wheel stands is spin and bravado. Here is a revolutionary idea how about you show it simply being run in a vehicle ?
Also, why have all the previous engines not been tested for reliability ?

I have mentioned this to you before Dennis in a phone conversation, and I'm not going to break the forum rules for your lack of following the correct procedure, when asking such questions. An email is as easy as posting on a forum.

What you say to a shareholder should be public, unless you are talking about verbal marketing (pie in the sky conversations) that have no foundation on current reality !
We have always been sceptical to the fact we don't get any detailed minutes nor video (we see a video in the photos) from any previous shareholders meetings. It is not sufficient to satisfy the demands and obligations required by revetec to their shareholders. Inadequate one line spin, that leave us thinking, why is it more convenient to hold shareholders meetings on the Goldcoast ?

If you have a technical question directly relating to our technology, I will do my up-most to respond.

YEAH !