|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
SSC Ultimate Aero breaks the world speed record
(from SSC Press Release)
Quote:
Weight = 2750 lbs Aspiration = twin turbochargers Torque = 1094 lb-ft @ 6150 rpm HP = 1183 hp @ 6950 rpm HP/Weight = 2.3 lbs per hp HP/Liter = 186.6 hp per liter 1/4 mile = 9.9 seconds @ 144 mph 0-60 mph = 2.78 seconds Top Speed = 257 mph
__________________
"Horsepower sells motor cars, but torque wins motor races." -Carrol Shelby Last edited by Sledgehammer; 10-30-2007 at 11:17 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The great thing about SSC breaking this record is that no one will care.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Seriously. No one cares.
It really does get boring after a while. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't understand why these sort of things are important. Making a car go really fast in a straight line is rather unchallenging.
Getting it to do 0-100-0mph in 9.4 seconds on a serious budget (Ultima) or generating immense lateral g's through mechanical grip (that prodrive thing...)is what impresses me.
__________________
Just call me Tom |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agreed. Limits of the vehicle are more interesting than the limits of the bodywork and engine. Its like this, would you rather watch a strongman bench press, or watch soccer/football (american) ect.
__________________
"Horsepower sells motor cars, but torque wins motor races." -Carrol Shelby |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
lower it
ahem, yeah so this one time i was at this party in the ghetto. i only goto these things because you all would not believe the number of hot girls with rich parents that just want to come and let loose. but these 3 really really big and gangster looking mofos were showing off their lowered fairlane, and it was pretty much just laying on the floor. and i walked up to them and said hmmm... very nice, but dont you think it should get lowered? totally embarrasing for them.
__________________
How could they tell you that you was built to last You built like a boxing bag, put a whoopin on that ass |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
does it go sideways?
__________________
The Datto will rage again... |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
repost?
SSC comes up short...kinda
__________________
Honor. Courage. Commitment. Etcetera. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
How important this is, is debatable. I mean, sure, it only has shown itself as a record holder of any sort by going in a straight line. However, this is an online forum that focuses on the automotive world, and looks to learn more about past and modern cars. I agree with you guys, but I still think general news, of any sort, is important, regardless of whether or not it is your favorite type of news (it IS going to go down in history as something relatively important, and you should at least know it happened, and is official. Just for the sake of knowing whats going on in the car world, which is what we are here for).
__________________
We put them [elected officials] in office to represent our communities, to represent OUR "ideal vision" of how things should be, and to serve us, honorably, not as a leader, but as a servant! |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ummm... I want one. And building an 1183 hp car that will go through an s bend at 210 mph... isn't as easy as you think. It has taken a lot of hard work for the SSC guys to get to this point... don't you think they deserve some recognition? I love Nobles and Ultimas more but surely SSC deserves some credit for this.
__________________
Dave |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sure sure, this was a big deal when it was European cars....
![]()
__________________
I dont if I'll make home tonight But I know I can swim under the Tahitian moon |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
McLaren F1 - held title for over 10 years, innovative, legendary,famously easy to drive and great to drive, revolutionary, etc... Koenigsegg - Just so damn cool and sexy. (but really, the main reason was at that point they were trying to beat a 10year old record. hence the big fuss) Bugatti Veyron - An extraordinary feat of engineering for so many reasons. Managed to work around the unaerodynamic bodywork given by designers, really. A great car, full of creature comforts. Everybody says its easy to drive, etc. Another revolution in my opinion. The SSC was given a crappy review the other day and is supposed to be pretty bad and the McLaren's been toppled so now not as much interest cos the Bugatti's such an extraordinarily well rounded car which is great to drive, comfortable, full of accessories, yet still is that bloody fast. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think that yall's comments are a little euro-biased. From the concept stage this car wasn't designed to be filled with creature-comforts, it was going to be a brutally powerful car. With that in mind SSC accomplished their goal. Am I saying the aero's the best car in the world? of course not, I firmly believe the McLaren F1 is. I don't measure a car by how fast it goes in a line, but SSC still deserves a lot of credit.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"Production" implies they have built, or will build many. Just because SSC intends to build many, doesn't mean that they will. What happens if no one wants one, and they only end up building one or two? At least Koeingsegg, whilst still dubious, had sold a few CC8Ss before the CCR, and it seemed like the sort of thing likely to find customers, but I'm not so sure that a dodgy Lamborghini Diablo kit car is going to have rich, Western tycoons, Saudi oil barons and Russian oligarchs salivating and waving their cheque books about. As for the relevance of the speed; I think c. 200-220mph is about the limit for roads (if you can find a quiet enough long, flat, straight, safe section) or runways. "Light speed", if you will. That meant the Bugatti EB110, Jaguar XJ220 in the mid-nineties were pretty noteworthy. The McLaren was a point of interest because, without setting out to achieve it, it managed to hit "ridiculous speed". Koenigsegg eyed up ridiculous speed for the press coverage, and Bugatti went one step further announcing "ludicrous speed" as the sole basis for their new car. Now SSC want to rival that, fine, it gets headlines. Now that it has hit 257mph, when again is an example of the car going to go that fast? The only place you can realistically think about going that fast is probably a salt-flat, and people were beating 257mph there seventy years ago, so what is the point of it? Get a JCB Dieselmax, do 350mph... A load of guff, IMHO. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bugatti Veyron 16.4 vs SSC Ultimate Aero | Gtek-i | Car comparison | 52 | Today 04:17 PM |
| narb's collection of pictures | narb | Multimedia | 1581 | 07-19-2008 12:37 PM |
| SSC Ultimate Aero | McLareN | Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out | 29 | 07-19-2008 07:01 AM |
| Bugatti Veyron vs SSC Standard Aero | JakRcr | Car comparison | 123 | 01-16-2006 05:51 AM |
| Dodge Ram SRT-10 | Matt | Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out | 33 | 05-28-2005 12:01 AM |
|
|