Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > Automotive forums > General Automotive


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #151  
Old 03-02-2008, 12:53 AM
Fleet 500's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,883
San Fernando Valley, Calif.
This is fun to watch. A 1970 440 Dodge Challenger VS a 2007 Dodge Charger SRT-8...
1970 Challenger 440 vs. 2007 Charger SRT-8 - Video
__________________
Cars:
Something which the Americans have made quite a few of which are designed and built and operate properly.

1969 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham... 0-100 mph in 20 seconds.
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 03-02-2008, 02:40 AM
Matra et Alpine's Avatar
le mans recovery mode =ON
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,274
nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet 500 View Post
This is fun to watch. A 1970 440 Dodge Challenger VS a 2007 Dodge Charger SRT-8...
1970 Challenger 440 vs. 2007 Charger SRT-8 - Video
Loved the sound .... BUT .... what's the point ?
A heavily modified 70s car versus a lightly modified modern.
What rubber are they runnung ?
Wonder how many ACTUAL mods ? lightened perhaps ?
Please, Fleet, if you want to post these try to be balanced and recognise that your reputation means it raises objections
__________________
___ธ„๘คบฐจธ„๘คบฐจจฐบค๘
——————-/ดฏ/)
——————/—/
————— /—/
—————/---/
———/ดฏ/' --'/ดฏฏ`ทธ
——/'/--/—./.——/จฏ\
——('(—ด—ด— ฏ./'—')
——-\——--——-'—-/
——--\———— _.ทด
——--—\————-----
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 03-02-2008, 03:06 AM
Fleet 500's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,883
San Fernando Valley, Calif.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
Loved the sound .... BUT .... what's the point ?
A heavily modified 70s car versus a lightly modified modern.
What rubber are they runnung ?
Wonder how many ACTUAL mods ? lightened perhaps ?
Please, Fleet, if you want to post these try to be balanced and recognise that your reputation means it raises objections
I wouldn't call mild head porting heavily modified.

As you said, more info should have been mentioned (axle ratio, other mods, tires, etc).

But I figured it was worth watching for the sound alone.
__________________
Cars:
Something which the Americans have made quite a few of which are designed and built and operate properly.

1969 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham... 0-100 mph in 20 seconds.
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 03-03-2008, 07:01 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet 500 View Post
I wouldn't call mild head porting heavily modified.

As you said, more info should have been mentioned (axle ratio, other mods, tires, etc).
...and you personally disassembled the engine and examined every component in order to verify that's the only mod that was done (since the car was built nearly 40 years ago).

Assuming the OEM exhaust manifolds are retained, a 440 MOPAR needs a serious cam, blueprinted heads and racing fuel to run with a a new SRT-8 - even though the SRT-8 is a lot heavier (e.g. 4,200 pounds).

The SRT-8 engine makes 425 Net HP and there is some evidence to support the fact that it is (truly) "under-rated).

The 440-6 pack produces 330 SAE NET HP per Chrysler (1971 information) and both Hale's formula and dyno tests on production line stock examples support that rating.

Thus, the best 440 would require about 100 HP worth of mods in order to match the output of a bone stock SRT-8 6.1 liter hemi.

Last edited by harddrivin1le; 03-03-2008 at 03:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 03-03-2008, 02:17 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 664
Quote:
Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
if you had actually bothered to read the comment, you would have noted that he WAS talking about the engine in race spec.....which at best could produce 480 BHP....which is by all means poor for a seven liter car....
http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/c...g?t=1204578338

See the results under the "FORD" column?

Those were obtained with a freshly and professionally rebuilt 427 "low riser" Cobra engine that was devoid of all engine accessories and exhaust (tested like the Chevy engine shown in the photo). It was also fully blueprinted to NHRA specs and yielded an ACTUAL CR of 12:1. It was over-bored by .020" and fitted with a slightly warmer cam grind as well as the more efficient "header style" exhaust manifolds that wouldn't fit between the Cobra's frame rails.

As tested and when optimally tuned, that Ford engine made a best of 460 GROSS HP. Those figures were obtained on the 110 octane racing fuel that was required to support that high CR in those old, inefficient heads.

460 Gross HP would equate to something on the order of 400 Net HP in the "as installed" configuration - assuming reasonably efficient mufflers were employed.

That's a long way from the 550 claimed HP and it's also a good distance from 480 HP (NET).

550 HP is POSSIBLE in a 427 Ford, but only with a very radical cam grind, an even higher CR, full headers and various internal mods to keep it together at higher RPM.

550 HP is about what the full tilt 427 NASCAR racing engines were producing in the mid to later 1960s. Obviously the production street engines made far less.

Last edited by harddrivin1le; 03-03-2008 at 03:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 03-03-2008, 06:25 PM
454MAG's Avatar
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 108
Long,Island
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
Loved the sound .... BUT .... what's the point ?
A heavily modified 70s car versus a lightly modified modern.
What rubber are they runnung ?
Wonder how many ACTUAL mods ? lightened perhaps ?
Please, Fleet, if you want to post these try to be balanced and recognise that your reputation means it raises objections
Stock 440 challenger vrs stock srt-8 Charger I think the Charger whould take the victory flagP.S The one in that clip is not a stock car!!

Last edited by 454MAG; 03-05-2008 at 08:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 03-09-2008, 08:06 AM
454MAG's Avatar
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 108
Long,Island
Nice match up but lets be fair
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IM000710.JPG (781.5 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg IM000713.JPG (763.8 KB, 2 views)
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 03-09-2008, 10:53 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 664
Quote:
Originally Posted by 454MAG View Post
Stock 440 challenger vrs stock srt-8 Charger I think the Charger whould take the victory flagP.S The one in that clip is not a stock car!!
It wouldn't even be close.

PRODUCTION LINE STOCK 440 Challengers had a hard time breaking through the 14.0 @ 101 MPH mark.

Some of the old magazine tests show somewhat faster results, but it's well documented that most of the "press cars" from that period were specially prepared (e.g. blueprinted engines fitted with warmer than stock cams) examples that were purpose-built to impress the press.

Here is a video of a documented stock 440 6 pack Superbee (along with several other "muscle car legends), which is roughly 125 pounds heavier than a 440 Challenger. At most that weight deficit might add 1/10th and 1 MPH to the results (vs. the Challenger with the same engine). A bone stock SRT8 would walk all over that sloth.

MUSCLE CAR 1/4 mile shootout Dodge Ford Chevy AMC Pontiac - AOL Video

Last edited by harddrivin1le; 03-09-2008 at 12:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 03-09-2008, 10:56 PM
Kitdy's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by harddrivin1le View Post
It wouldn't even be close.

PRODUCTION LINE STOCK 440 Challengers had a hard time breaking through the 14.0 @ 101 MPH mark.

Some of the old magazine tests show somewhat faster results, but it's well documented that most of the "press cars" from that period were specially prepared (e.g. blueprinted engines fitted with warmer than stock cams) examples that were purpose-built to impress the press.

Here is a video of a documented stock 440 6 pack Superbee (along with several other "muscle car legends), which is roughly 125 pounds heavier than a 440 Challenger. At most that weight deficit might add 1/10th and 1 MPH to the results (vs. the Challenger with the same engine). A bone stock SRT8 would walk all over that sloth.

MUSCLE CAR 1/4 mile shootout Dodge Ford Chevy AMC Pontiac - AOL Video
What is a blueprinted engine and what are warmer/radical cams?
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 03-09-2008, 11:15 PM
nota's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitdy View Post
What is a blueprinted engine and what are warmer/radical cams?
How to blueprint a 1970 Falcon GT-HO
Reply With Quote
  #161  
Old 03-15-2008, 09:46 PM
Fleet 500's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,883
San Fernando Valley, Calif.
This is a fun review to read of a 1968 Dodge Charger R/T with 426-Hemi. From the magazine "Speed & Supercar," Aug., 1968.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 68charger.jpg (417.3 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg 68charger2.jpg (294.6 KB, 2 views)
__________________
Cars:
Something which the Americans have made quite a few of which are designed and built and operate properly.

1969 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham... 0-100 mph in 20 seconds.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gran Turismo 5 (Wish) Car List Sauc3 Gaming 169 10-29-2008 07:10 AM
Jay Leno's new car.... Smithman Miscellaneous 14 12-02-2006 08:25 PM
Dodge Charger Experience Cotterik General Automotive 43 12-23-2005 04:04 AM
Jay Leno's Motorcycle ScionDriver Miscellaneous 3 02-08-2005 08:17 AM
Buick Roadmaster - Jay Leno's 55 Matt Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 15 12-29-2004 12:28 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:21 AM.

  Contact Us - Ultimatecarpage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
ฉ 1998 - 2008 Ultimatecarpage.com - LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0