1994 Ford SVT 10.0L Boss Mustang

[kylekosir]

Pretty Good start for this car. But doesnt go as fast as I thought it would.


General Information
Price: Concept Car
Miles Per Gallon: --/-- mpg
Curb Weight: 3695 lbs
Layout: Front-Engine/RWD
Transmission: 3-Speed Auto
Engine
Type: V8
Displacement: 9804 cc
Horsepower: 855 bhp @ 6200 rpm
Torque: 790 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm
Redline: 7200 rpm
Performance
0-60 mph: 1.9 sec
0-100 mph: 5.5 sec
Quarter Mile: 10.55 sec @ 135 mph
Skidpad: .--g
Top Speed: --- mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: --- ft
Slalom Speed: --- mph
http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/fordbossmustang.html

[digitalcraft]

it has a 0 - 60 of 1.9 seconds. what exactly are you looking for?

[Sweeney921]

I bet the gas mileage is absolutely repulsive. Still, it's a crazy fast car

[PsychoChimp22]

Originally Posted by Sweeney921

I bet the gas mileage is absolutely repulsive. Still, it's a crazy fast car

Ya, measured in gallons/mile

[IWantAnAudiRS6]

Dear Lord! That thing is absolutely crazy! 10 litres, 855bhp... what do you mean, it's not as fast as you thought it would be? Looks good, too!

[taz_rocks_miami]

Originally Posted by digitalcraft

it has a 0 - 60 of 1.9 seconds. what exactly are you looking for?

I was about to say the same thing. What are you used to driving...the space shuttle??

[CdocZ]

DAAAAAAAAM!!!!!!!!! 10l engine?!?!?! wow, probably isnt that fast cause of how much the friggin engine weighs......must be loud as hell too

[hotwheels]

10's and that ain't as fast as you thought........holy cow, i have a twinturbo'd car that only get's into the 12's.......i would love to have a 10sec car......let me know if you would like to trade, cause i know i would love to have that car. Thanks for the link to the pics, car is truly beautiful..........hotwheels of turborides

[ZeTurbo]

10L!!!!!!!!!!!!!! waaaaaaaaaaaaaa that is absolute madnessss!!!

[jcp123]

I like the sheer audacity of it...

[NoOne]

I don't get it, it says 9804cc (which is actually 9.8l not 10.0l) and it still claims to be a V8 when it is obviously 2 302cid(4.9l each) V8's.

I also have to agree with kylekosir, it's not as fast (judging by the ¼ mile time) as it should be with 855bhp/790lb-ft, it should be in the mid 9's - as the pictures only show 1 engine maybe the car doesn't really exist.

[fpv_gtho]

unless of course theres a major, major, MAJOR wheelspin problem. would the 3 speed auto change anything?

[NoOne]

My old '70 Roadrunner would run fairly consistent 10.8's at around 127-130mph with around 550hp (never had it dynoed) and a 3 speed auto tranny, it also weighed 3700lbs, my '94 'stang did a best ¼ mile of 11.2@122 mph, but was consistent mid 11's in the 115-120mph and that was with less than 500hp (probably closer to 430-450hp) with a 5 speed.

Wheelspin is no excuse for a bad e.t., if (and for me its a big "IF") this car exists and really does produce 855bhp money would/should have been spent on a 4 link or at least a ladder bar set-up and some really sticky rubber - non-D.O.T. dirt track tires.

[<AAA-MOD>]

Originally Posted by NoOne

as the pictures only show 1 engine maybe the car doesn't really exist.

It's still in one piece, and no evident puddle of oil under it either.

Rumour has it that John Coletti (SVT Director) will be bringing it home whenever he decides to retire.

Here's a few pics from about a yr ago.

[NoOne]

Now don't I feel stupid for not noticing it was a big block(428 badge on valve cover) ,

I'm amazed they were able to punch it out to 600+ cid tho.