MG Midget MKII x Triumph Spitfire 4 MKII

[lfb666]

MG Midget MKII
Motor: 4 Cyl, 1098 cc, 59cv.

Triumph Spitfire 4 MkII:
Motor: 4 Cyl, 1147 cc, 67cv.

[McReis]

Finally someone compares interesting cars

[henk4]

the Spitfire because of its more intersting drive resulting from its swing axle independent rear suspension.

[RS6]

The Spitfire, simply because I prefer the looks.

[pergarec]

I prefer the tractor in the background j/k

Otherwise, the Spitfire.

[man 430gt]

Originally Posted by pergarec

I prefer the tractor in the background j/k

Otherwise, the Spitfire.

Same

[:Exige:]

Midget .. Ive known people how have had both of these. The Midget is a proper "Lane Stormer". You dont need to go fast. The Spitfire was terrible .. it handled like a tank and accelerated like one too. Didnt feel as pure as the MG .. it also sprayed liquids everywhere. You name a liquid and its been found seeping into the interior of the Spitfire. I do know someone whos put a huge Rover V8 in a spitfire with alot of power .. quite a scary machine because it still handles as bad.

[johnnynumfiv]

I'd take the midget,i wonder why... I know a fellow who races a spit, its not a bad car at all, faster than mine, but i still perfer the midget.