Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > Automotive forums > Car comparison


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 01-10-2008, 06:00 PM
Matra et Alpine's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,538
nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
Try comparing both cars endurance racing record.
at least it was capable and tried, winning first in class in it's race version - the 961
How many F40 entries in rallying ??
__________________
Understeer is hitting the wall with the front of the car
- Oversteer is hitting the wall with the rear of the car
- - Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall
- - - Torque is how far you push wall
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-10-2008, 11:55 PM
Ferrer's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,047
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
at least it was capable and tried, winning first in class in it's race version - the 961
How many F40 entries in rallying ??
Well the thing is the Ferrari Group B contender should've been the 288 GTO, not the F40.

Which anyway didn't enter anything either.
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-11-2008, 01:31 PM
NSXType-R's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,077
East Coast of the United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
WHich 959 ? I remember a car test in the 80s where they took a lightweight, no frills added F40 and put it up against a COMFORT version of the 959 and then proclaimed the F40 the better. Felt back then it was a clear editorial bias as they should have pitted the Sport 959 whci was the lighter and faster.

But even then, the 959 couldn't keep up with an F40, the 959 just wasn't geared enough to keep pushing hard beyond 140-150.

However, how many DAKAR did the F40 win ?
I didn't know they made a 959 sport.

Either way, both cars were blisteringly fast for their time period. Instant classics.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-11-2008, 02:09 PM
broken's Avatar
Novice
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 30
Porsche is my favorite car company and I love the 959 but I'm going to have to go with the F40 on this one. Just for the fact that it's Enzo's last design and it's the last pure Ferrari IMO. Put it this way, if you tell a little kid to draw a sports car, he'll draw an F40.
__________________
PSN: onikron
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-05-2008, 10:10 PM
jump15vc's Avatar
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 347
NJ/Florida
Send a message via AIM to jump15vc Send a message via MSN to jump15vc Send a message via Yahoo to jump15vc
f40 just because, a 959 looks like a stretched 911, an f40 looks entirely unique
__________________
-Fundamentals are a crutch for the talentless.

-I thought the blacks in Baltimore were bad, shit, they’re nothing compared to these fags you got here in San Francisco…haha.

-Kenny Powers
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-13-2008, 07:12 PM
gtsgtsgt's Avatar
Novice
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 35
well f40 is for me, every thing about it was so brilliant, 959 was a very good car but f40 was just better.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-19-2008, 02:44 PM
Novice
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 49
The F40 is a great drivers car, the Porsche 959 is a great piece of engineering but does not involve you the same way the F40 does. I know two owners who recently sold the 959's and bought F40s.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-19-2008, 03:18 PM
dydzi's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,450
Warsaw
Send a message via MSN to dydzi
Quote:
Originally Posted by NSXType-R View Post
I didn't know they made a 959 sport.

Either way, both cars were blisteringly fast for their time period. Instant classics.
even more surprising than you'd've thought... Porsche 959 Paris Dakar

F40 for me. better in every aspect
__________________
12 cylinders or walk!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-19-2008, 04:02 PM
kigango123's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 750
bama
F40 seems the more satisfying choice in both a collector and racing aspect
__________________
Once fanboyism infects you it impares all your judgement.
It's like being drunk, you lack common sense and everyone laughs at you.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-19-2008, 04:16 PM
Ferrer's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,047
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Quote:
Originally Posted by dydzi View Post
even more surprising than you'd've thought... Porsche 959 Paris Dakar

F40 for me. better in every aspect
Well that was the point. The 959 was supposed to be a development for a Group B rally car.
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-19-2008, 05:36 PM
NSXType-R's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,077
East Coast of the United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by dydzi View Post
even more surprising than you'd've thought... Porsche 959 Paris Dakar

F40 for me. better in every aspect
Well I knew that it had a Dakar rally variant. I just didn't know that they had a sport version of the 959.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-26-2008, 08:14 AM
Novice
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 56
Europe
F40 for me. However I recent read article by a guy who owns both and says the F50 is an even better car:

Ferrari Life Quarterly, The International Magazine About Ferrari & Lifestyle - Ferrari Life

Issue #7
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-22-2008, 10:43 AM
Novice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2
Florida , u.s.a.
The 288GTO Evoluzione never made it to a race and Ferrari took from there for the F40. A F40 is way faster than a 959 in everything, but in the rain the 959 will easily beat the F40. Anyway I don't care, just a F40 for me.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-22-2008, 01:05 PM
Novice
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torocojonudo View Post
The 288GTO Evoluzione never made it to a race and Ferrari took from there for the F40. A F40 is way faster than a 959 in everything, but in the rain the 959 will easily beat the F40. Anyway I don't care, just a F40 for me.
On a F1 type track, the 959 and F40 will be very close. In fact the 959 might be slightly quicker.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-23-2008, 02:21 AM
Novice
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 56
Europe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torocojonudo View Post
The 288GTO Evoluzione never made it to a race and Ferrari took from there for the F40. A F40 is way faster than a 959 in everything, but in the rain the 959 will easily beat the F40. Anyway I don't care, just a F40 for me.
On a track, the 959 has ABS. This will allow it to brake a bit later and get on the power earlier coming out of a corner. Hence it will be slightly quicker than an F40.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Really useful performance listings... Egg Nog Technical forums 54 02-05-2006 09:07 PM
Porsche vs. Ferrari Scarface Car comparison 104 02-17-2004 09:58 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:50 AM.

  Contact Us - Ultimatecarpage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
© 1998 - 2009 Ultimatecarpage.com - Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1