Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > Automotive forums > Car comparison


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 06-16-2008, 01:17 PM
dydzi's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,450
Warsaw
Send a message via MSN to dydzi
Quote:
Originally Posted by NSXType-R View Post
So what exactly did they make to compete in the GT1 class, or do they not have cars in GT1 class altogether?
it's the same as in FIA GT since the fall of 90's... you can see all the results with the name of cars and specific classes here: http://www.lemans.org/24heuresdumans/chronos/h24.pdf

Porsche do not have car in GT1 now. in previous rules, the GT1 car was 911 GT1. in GT2 they run 997 GT3 RSR, which is a very different car to GT3 RS. As for now, Ferrari also runs only GT2 car - F430 GTC (430 Scuderia does not compete anywhere), which is made in two versions - GT2 and GT3 (which competes in FIA GT3 class). in GT1 they had 575 GTC and couple of 550 versions made by italtecnica, prodrive and weith, not ferrari itself
__________________
12 cylinders or walk!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-16-2008, 04:52 PM
Kitdy's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
LMP cars achieve topspeeds that current F1 cars can only dream of.
And F1 cars can generate downforce that LMP cars can only dream of.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-16-2008, 04:56 PM
The_Canuck's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,691
True North
I'd like to see a P2 cars level of downforce compared to a F1 car's.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-16-2008, 06:50 PM
RacingManiac's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitdy View Post
And F1 cars can generate downforce that LMP cars can only dream of.
I doubt it. Downforce to weight ratio on F1 car is much better, but outright number is very similar at current competition. But last batch of Group C car in the the early 90s makes insane level of downforce, some are close and even exceeding 10000lb, with L/D ratio over 5:1. No F1 car can ever do that...
__________________
University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
www.fsae.utoronto.ca
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-17-2008, 01:14 AM
henk4's Avatar
very senior member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 21,938
Rozenburg, Holland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitdy View Post
And F1 cars can generate downforce that LMP cars can only dream of.
as far as "flying" is concerned, i am sure you remember Kubica's "fly past" in the Canada GP from last year....
__________________
"I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 06-17-2008, 04:08 AM
Kitdy's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacingManiac View Post
I doubt it. Downforce to weight ratio on F1 car is much better, but outright number is very similar at current competition. But last batch of Group C car in the the early 90s makes insane level of downforce, some are close and even exceeding 10000lb, with L/D ratio over 5:1. No F1 car can ever do that...
My mistake.

Quote:
Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
as far as "flying" is concerned, i am sure you remember Kubica's "fly past" in the Canada GP from last year....
This is true!
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 06-17-2008, 02:58 PM
jugga's Avatar
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 206
England
surely alot of the flying is due to track condition. le mans tracks are normally less perfected than f1 tracks so there is a greater chance of the car get high enough to loose downforce.

also a lemans car is like rectangle underneath and a f1 car like a thin strip with wheels so surely the air will effect the le mans more in that way.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 06-17-2008, 06:08 PM
RacingManiac's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,762
definitely, the full bottom on on a LMP car just makes it so much easier to catch air when the car is presented in some odd angle or attitude. I am sure that the condition of the spin and track surface is the main reason whether or not the car flip/fly across the track....Most of the accident this year all happened at highspeed when the car goes over grass or curb which means its likely the car will bounce over something...
__________________
University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
www.fsae.utoronto.ca
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 06-17-2008, 08:21 PM
NSXType-R's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,077
East Coast of the United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wouter Melissen View Post
The difference between GT1 and GT2 is the level of development allowed on them. Modifications for GT2 are limited, while GT1 cars are virtual prototypes that retain the overall shape and chassis of the original cars, but include many, many modifications. The Porsche 993 GT2 was a GT1 (was known as GT2 back then) car as was the Ferrari 575 GTC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dydzi View Post
it's the same as in FIA GT since the fall of 90's... you can see all the results with the name of cars and specific classes here: http://www.lemans.org/24heuresdumans/chronos/h24.pdf

Porsche do not have car in GT1 now. in previous rules, the GT1 car was 911 GT1. in GT2 they run 997 GT3 RSR, which is a very different car to GT3 RS. As for now, Ferrari also runs only GT2 car - F430 GTC (430 Scuderia does not compete anywhere), which is made in two versions - GT2 and GT3 (which competes in FIA GT3 class). in GT1 they had 575 GTC and couple of 550 versions made by italtecnica, prodrive and weith, not ferrari itself
I see. So the GT1 class is dead now?

But what exactly did they create to conform to the rules?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacingManiac View Post
I doubt it. Downforce to weight ratio on F1 car is much better, but outright number is very similar at current competition. But last batch of Group C car in the the early 90s makes insane level of downforce, some are close and even exceeding 10000lb, with L/D ratio over 5:1. No F1 car can ever do that...
But wouldn't that create too much drag, making a slower car altogether?
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 06-17-2008, 08:47 PM
DanWheldon's Avatar
Novice
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 87
Giessen
Quote:
Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
LMP cars achieve topspeeds that current F1 cars can only dream of.
actually that stopped in 1999, but in the Group C years the LM cars were in a tough battle with turbo powered F1 cars to see which one had the best top speed
__________________
Let's avoid boring F1
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 06-17-2008, 10:03 PM
RacingManiac's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,762
Quote:
Originally Posted by NSXType-R View Post

But wouldn't that create too much drag, making a slower car altogether?

Having L/D ratio of 5:1 as opposed to something of 2.5:1, means that at the same level of downforce its only generating half the drag, leading up to much higher top speed with similar cornering potential, making a car that can potentially overcome the weight disadvantage of the closed-wheel sportscar on a track. In the 3.5L formula Group C car, despite being 150kg heavier than the comparable era 3.5 L F1 cars(and having less power due to the endurance nature of the car, although the engine are comparable as 3.5L Group C cars infact uses the same engine reg as the F1 cars at the time), can lap within 2 sec of their lap time. In fact I believe from looking at time from 1991 or 1992, the pole sitting Group C car could infact qualify 6th on the British GP of the same year.....

Similar trend can be seen now actually in IRL vs ALMS cars. At track like St. Pete where both series run on the same weekend, the ALMS LMP1 and LMP2 cars are qualifying within a sec of the IRL cars, despite the IRL cars being lighter as well. Although to note that the spec nature of the IRL series do tend to limit the technological advancement of the series compare to the LMP cars now....
__________________
University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
www.fsae.utoronto.ca
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 06-17-2008, 11:07 PM
kingofthering's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,837
95616
Send a message via AIM to kingofthering
Quote:
Originally Posted by NSXType-R View Post
I see. So the GT1 class is dead now?

But what exactly did they create to conform to the rules?
Porsche had the 911 GT1, while the Corvettes basically won forever until Aston and even Ferrari unseated their domination.

Hopefully the Aston victory brings more privateers back so that ALMS GT1 is not a 2 car class.
__________________
(looks at damaged 2000GT)

They have injured my soul. UNFORGIVABLE!

I'm the king of the ring, not sofas.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:17 AM
RacingManiac's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,762
Well nothing's changed in the balance of GT1 before and after Le Mans, since Aston won last year as well but still no car in GT1 other than Vette all this time....Its hard for any private team to compete with a factory outfit, even with a good car....
__________________
University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
www.fsae.utoronto.ca
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:43 AM
Jack_Bauer's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,160
UK
Send a message via MSN to Jack_Bauer
Quote:
Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
LMP cars achieve topspeeds that current F1 cars can only dream of.
I'm interested to know where you got that idea from?

Out of interest, what sort of top speeds were the LMP cars making on the Mulsanne straights this year? I couldn't find any top speed stats on the official timing pdf sheets.
__________________
uәʞoɹq spɹɐoqʎәʞ ʎɯ
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:46 AM
Wouter Melissen's Avatar
Supporting Admin
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,266
Rozenburg
Send a message via MSN to Wouter Melissen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_Bauer View Post
I'm interested to know where you got that idea from?

Out of interest, what sort of top speeds were the LMP cars making on the Mulsanne straights this year? I couldn't find any top speed stats on the official timing pdf sheets.
At least 345 km/h, but the ACO reported the Dome ran 358 km/h, although that figure sounds a bit fishy.
__________________
If you should see a man walking down a crowded street talking aloud to himself, don't run in the opposite direction, but run towards him, because he's a poet. You have nothing to fear from the poet - but the truth.

(Ted Joans)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gran Turismo 5 Sauc3 Gaming 241 11-12-2009 08:35 PM
Le Mans 24 hour race through the last few decades Sledgehammer Multimedia 14 11-17-2008 03:26 PM
2008 24 Hours of Le Mans Official Thread Wouter Melissen Racing forums 254 08-24-2008 01:11 AM
Team Adt Champion Racing And The Audi R8 Finish 2005 Motorsport Season Victorious QuattroMan Racing forums 4 11-03-2005 05:10 PM
Audi Teams Face Tough Task At Le Mans QuattroMan Racing forums 3 06-19-2005 11:55 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:11 AM.

  Contact Us - Ultimatecarpage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
© 1998 - 2009 Ultimatecarpage.com - Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1