|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Caparo T1 prototypes completed
Caparo Vehicle Technologies has built the first two production prototypes of its Caparo T1 road car. Completion of the "XP1" prototypes marks the beginning of a rigorous test program before production cars can be built and delivered to customers early next spring. The shake-down will include engine mapping and other specific tests as well as long-term durability and high speed trials.
A second prototype — the XP2 — is expected to be completed before Christmas and will similarly be tested for durability and performance. The highly experienced professional race driver Chris Goodwin will help to evaluate both vehicles for their all-important handling characteristics and dynamic performance on the track.
__________________
Minimising losses can maximise net gains |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought it had a roof.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
maybe its a hard top?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The aero screen/canopy is optional.
__________________
Thanks for all the fish |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Less aerodynamic, not as cool
![]()
__________________
PPC - Put a V8 in it! |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
i don't see how jeremy clarkson will be able to test it on top gear, considering how small the cockpit is. Can't wait to see the production car
__________________
I am the Stig Ferrari Constructors Champions 2007 |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wouldn't it be less rigid if it had no top?
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not neccessairly. If it was designed to have a removable roof it can still be just as stiff. Though of course the roof would allow extra chassis stiffness
__________________
Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death... – Hunter Thompson |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
It looks nice already. Hopefully all the testing will go well.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
the center of gravity on this car is so low and the structure is such that a roof wouldn't help it be much stiffer. Also remember that the effect of chassis rigidity on handling is proportional to weight, so losing the roof could effectively increase the stiffness assuming that the roof doesn't help as a structural element. (Less Inertia/Mass means less torque on the chassis, hence less twisting.)
__________________
Dave |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Holy Crap it's small!!!!
__________________
UCP's BSG Nerd and a resident Freerider. flickr page:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jaru72/ |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
that thing is ugly
__________________
Ferrari will be WCC. Whoever wins the WDC will be from the Scuderia.........Yet who? |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Caparo T1 vs Bugatti Veyron 16.4 | Gtek-i | Car comparison | 36 | 07-23-2007 04:32 PM |
| Freestream | Caparo T1 | McLareN | Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out | 72 | 07-01-2007 12:02 AM |
| The news of the day | drakkie | Miscellaneous | 16 | 04-20-2006 08:21 AM |
|
|