2004 Cadillac SRX.

[baddabang]

heres some specs and pics
SRX buyers also have two engine choices: a brand-new, 3.6-liter V-6 and a new version of Cadillac's DOHC Northstar V-8. Both motors have four valves per cylinder and variable valve timing, and are mounted longitudinally. The Northstar V-8, the engine in the tester for this article, pumps out 320 horsepower and 315 foot-pounds of torque. That is enough to give the 4,442-pound AWD version an estimated 0-60 time of 6.7 seconds.

According to General Motors' (nyse: GM - news - people ) preliminary figures on the EPA mileage test, an SRX configured like the tester gets 16 miles per gallon in city driving and 20 in highway driving. Want better mileage? The V-6, which has 260 horsepower and is 278 pounds lighter when in RWD format, is expected to deliver city and highway mileage of 18 and 23 miles per gallon, respectively.

The tester with the 4.6-liter V-8 was a preproduction model, but the bottom-line sticker of an identically equipped production SRX is $54,140. The math: a $46,300 base price for the V-8 SRX, plus $7,145 for Cadillac's luxury performance package (all-wheel drive, magnetic ride control, DVD navigation with an in-dash six-CD and eight8-speaker Bose audio system, and high-intensity discharge lamps) and a $695 destination charge. Only a few significant options were missing from the tester: A third-row seat adds $1,000, and the sunroof option is either $1,800 or $2,400, in which the pricier version includes a sunroof over the third-row seat.
- From forbes.com

[baddabang]

Interior, i guess the last one is like an airbag map

[BMW Lover]

CAn u tell me why u start this thread ????

[Batmobile_Turbo]

Originally Posted by BMW Lover

CAn u tell me why u start this thread ????

to show everyone the new SRX's specs and see people's opinions on it it's supposed to be informative

I think this is a very beutiful and luxurious SUV

[Egg Nog]

I don't like it. It embodies everything found in every other SUV. Because of this, its mere existence fails.

[BMW Lover]

Originally Posted by Batmobile_Turbo

to show everyone the new SRX's specs and see people's opinions on it it's supposed to be informative

I think this is a very beutiful and luxurious SUV

ok
my bad
i don't really like all the cadillac except the ESCALADE but i can deal with it

[bum-man]

Originally Posted by Egg Nog

I don't like it. It embodies everything found in every other SUV. Because of this, its mere existence fails.

blah! another pointless SUV thing from caddy is this one #4??? i think it is.

[Batmobile_Turbo]

it's technically not an SUV it's a "sport-wagon"

[bum-man]

Originally Posted by Batmobile_Turbo

it's technically not an SUV it's a "sport-wagon"

ahh ok never mind.

[Egg Nog]

Originally Posted by Batmobile_Turbo

it's technically not an SUV it's a "sport-wagon"

Well, BMW calls the X5 a "SAV" for "Sports Activity Vehicle", but that doesn't really change the fact that it's an SUV

[Boxster17]

I don't really care for many of the Cadillacs except I like the CTS-V I think that's pretty sweet for an American car. And I liked the Cien concept, and I suppose the XLR isn't too bad either - and supposedly it's quite a good buy.

[BMW Lover]

Originally Posted by Egg Nog

Well, BMW calls the X5 a "SAV" for "Sports Activity Vehicle", but that doesn't really change the fact that it's an SUV

Whats' the differecne between SUV and SAV ??

[GT500]

to me, just like the Escalade, the SRX is a failure. (i'm weird, yes) Mainly the horrible looks of today's Cadillacs make it a failure, but of course there are other reasons. I really think Bangle designed all of these...

[Egg Nog]

Originally Posted by BMW Lover

Whats' the differecne between SUV and SAV ??

...I'm trying to stress that there is no difference, despite being called different things.