Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > Automotive forums > General Automotive


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-19-2005, 12:02 AM
brum's Avatar
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 118
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBrake4Rainbows
How is it that the Daihatsu Copen is Banned, But the Cappucino Isn't?
Copen isn't is it?, this is what I found.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RTA Website
Exempted vehicles
The following turbo and supercharged vehicles are exempt and will not require an application form to be submitted:

All diesel powered engine vehicles.
Suzuki Cappuccino 2D Cabriolet Turbo 3 698cc (1/01/1992 - 1/12/11997).
Daihatsu Copen L880 2D Convertible Turbo 4 659cc (1/10/2003- ).
Smart vehicles (all models).
__________________
There are only two possible explanations: either no one told me, or no one knows.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-19-2005, 01:13 AM
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 20,719
St Marys Western Sydney
Send a message via MSN to fpv_gtho
Looks like the RTA's starting to give in to pressure
__________________
I am the Stig
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-19-2005, 03:06 AM
2ndclasscitizen's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,576
Sydney, Down Under
i mean a smart, come on. I'm waiting for them to give into volvo and MB
__________________
Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
– Hunter Thompson
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-19-2005, 04:06 AM
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 20,719
St Marys Western Sydney
Send a message via MSN to fpv_gtho
well those smart's can be pretty top heavy things and theyve got those smart roadsters afterall

but yeah..those ones were common sense really, but some will take the opportunity at a few cars being added to the exemptions to fight for others
__________________
I am the Stig
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-19-2005, 04:18 AM
2ndclasscitizen's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,576
Sydney, Down Under
the smart city car is sposed to be one of the worst handling cars ever
__________________
Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
– Hunter Thompson
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-19-2005, 04:20 AM
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 20,719
St Marys Western Sydney
Send a message via MSN to fpv_gtho
So far i havent heard of anyone doing any stunts like those performed in the first MB A -Classes though. One positive i suppose is theyre RWD
__________________
I am the Stig
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-20-2005, 12:25 AM
IBrake4Rainbows's Avatar
Follow that honey!
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 13,132
For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
Send a message via MSN to IBrake4Rainbows
Anyone seen the Pizza New Series. You seem to be able to do a lot with a Smart.

It's remarkably stupid legislation. Period.
__________________
What I may lack in compassion I make up for in lack of compassion.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-20-2005, 04:13 AM
nota's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,855
From today's Australian newspaper:

'Cars prohibited include entry-level Mercedes such as the C180K and E200K, most Volvos and all Saabs. "The E350 is not on that list but has nearly twice the power of the E200K", Mercedes sales manager Clyde Cambell said'

This is insanity

It goes to show what can happen when faceless unaccountable idiots are put into in a position of power within a field they obviously fail to understand
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-20-2005, 04:56 AM
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 20,719
St Marys Western Sydney
Send a message via MSN to fpv_gtho
Quote:
Originally Posted by nota
From today's Australian newspaper:

'Cars prohibited include entry-level Mercedes such as the C180K and E200K, most Volvos and all Saabs. "The E350 is not on that list but has nearly twice the power of the E200K", Mercedes sales manager Clyde Cambell said'

This is insanity

It goes to show what can happen when faceless unaccountable idiots are put into in a position of power within a field they obviously fail to understand
You may have seen Motor's coverage over it in their latest mag, but theyve got a list of 7-8 cars and listing whether Vic with the power to weight limit allows or restricts them and vice versa now with NSW, and pretty much whatever NSW allowed, VIC didnt such as the integra type r, and what VIC allowed, we didnt such as all the 3 c yl turbo's, volvo's, merc's and even the mini cooper s
__________________
I am the Stig
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-20-2005, 03:38 PM
nota's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,855
Haven't seen MM, but jeez FPV what a cockup. Will anyone get the sack - nah of course not, coz the lunatics are taking over the asylum. I bet this emanates from the same Staysafe/Paul Gibson (safety-nazi) Govt department drongos that have repeatedly called for 110km/h speed limiters to be compulsary fitment on all cars .. they obviously haven't tried overtaking a truck with 6 mph (twice walking speed) to spare
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 07-20-2005, 10:31 PM
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 20,719
St Marys Western Sydney
Send a message via MSN to fpv_gtho
I think Motor and Wheels are considering it as just part of their massive campaign against the government and their dodgy rules, which stretches to the governments speed blitz campaigns, ignoring evidence that 130km/h is safer than 110km/h and a few other things. It makes you wonder though, had Bob Carr not been re-elected, would Brogden (NSW liberal opposition) have tried a similar stunt?
__________________
I am the Stig
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07-22-2005, 07:47 PM
Blue Supra's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,799
In the shed
prolly not, whats the oppositions stance on this?
__________________
The Datto will rage again...
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07-22-2005, 10:37 PM
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 20,719
St Marys Western Sydney
Send a message via MSN to fpv_gtho
i havent heard too much about it, i think Labour's had a hard enough time dealing with the NRMA and their own advisors, let alone what the Lib's think
__________________
I am the Stig
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-24-2008, 07:35 AM
Novice
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Has anyone with a "prohibited vehicle" been granted an exemption on the basis that your vehicle is a 'moderated', 'principal family vehicle'?

What does "principal family vehicle" mean?
Does it mean it has to be the ONLY car you have in the household?
Does it mean it has to be the MAINLY USED car when you have more than one car?

What are the determining factors to find that the vehicle is a 'principal family vehicle'?
What is the likelyhood to have exemption granted?

I am intending to apply for an exemption on this basis; but I don't want to waste $23 and have my application rejected.
So it would be appreciated if anyone could help or provide any related information.

Thanks!!
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-24-2008, 08:06 AM
clutch-monkey's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 13,807
brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
Send a message via MSN to clutch-monkey
exemption is balls hard. i doubt you will get it unless there is literally no alternative.
__________________
Falling pregnant accidentally is like locking your keys in your car...you're confused, upset, embarrassed to tell anyone - and both instances can be solved using a coathanger.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:50 PM.

  Contact Us - Ultimatecarpage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
© 1998 - 2009 Ultimatecarpage.com - Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1