Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > Automotive forums > General Automotive


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 06-10-2008, 02:14 PM
NSXType-R's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,078
East Coast of the United States
I'm waiting for it to get an insanely fast Nurburgring track time.

Then I can laugh at both the Cadillac and BMW/Audi/Mercedes/Lexus fanboys when they try to defend their own favorite cars.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-10-2008, 02:22 PM
Zytek_Fan's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,337
Idaho
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockefella View Post



Brand image will definitey be the Cadillac's demise in Europe, but this current CTS and CTS-V should pioneer a new era of GM respect in places outside of America. The CTS is a good car, but people have trouble looking past American history to throw away the stereotype. Also, $3000 isn't much when taking into account the MSRP and available options on all cars.
In Europe, if someone wants a fast, V8 engined GM, they buy a Monaro or a VXR8...
__________________
David says:
ZE WERE SUPPOSED TO WIN THIS RACE EVERY YEAR FOR A THOUSAND YEARS
David says:
with an awkward salute
Cameron says:
somewhat reminiscent of his hitler youth days
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-10-2008, 02:59 PM
Rockefella's Avatar
what is this i dont even
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,208
Northern New Jersey
Send a message via AIM to Rockefella Send a message via MSN to Rockefella
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan View Post
In Europe, if someone wants a fast, V8 engined GM, they buy a Monaro or a VXR8...
Because this was the best option for an American v8 engined car. The CTS and CTS-v probably hold that claim now. I don't want to sound like a fan boy because I'm not, but this car didn't win Motor Trend car of the year for nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-10-2008, 03:22 PM
Zytek_Fan's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,337
Idaho
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockefella View Post
Because this was the best option for an American v8 engined car. The CTS and CTS-v probably hold that claim now. I don't want to sound like a fan boy because I'm not, but this car didn't win Motor Trend car of the year for nothing.
You do make a good point.
But, Motor Trend ___ of the year isn't anything to brag about for any manufacturer anymore, since they'll just hand out an award if they think a car deserves it. Usually it's something new from a manufacturer, like the Motor Trend Truck of the Year Toyota Tundra...I'm sure the Lexus IS-F will get one too (which is actually a Lexus I'm excited to see/hear)
__________________
David says:
ZE WERE SUPPOSED TO WIN THIS RACE EVERY YEAR FOR A THOUSAND YEARS
David says:
with an awkward salute
Cameron says:
somewhat reminiscent of his hitler youth days
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-10-2008, 03:23 PM
The_Canuck's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,691
True North
It's got alot of horsepower.

However it is a bloody cow, if we can bash the GT-R for this, we can bash the CTS-V. Also...it does not look good, honestly. Interesting car though.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-10-2008, 03:26 PM
Zytek_Fan's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,337
Idaho
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Canuck View Post
It's got alot of horsepower.

However it is a bloody cow, if we can bash the GT-R for this, we can bash the CTS-V. Also...it does not look good, honestly. Interesting car though.
The GT-R does bring something to the table, being a affordable "super" car...


How much is the new CTS-V going to cost anyway?
__________________
David says:
ZE WERE SUPPOSED TO WIN THIS RACE EVERY YEAR FOR A THOUSAND YEARS
David says:
with an awkward salute
Cameron says:
somewhat reminiscent of his hitler youth days
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-10-2008, 03:45 PM
Lagonda's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,912
Belgium
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan View Post
In Europe, if someone wants a fast, V8 engined GM, they buy a Monaro or a VXR8...
But nobody wants a V8 engined GM car over here
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-10-2008, 04:10 PM
clutch-monkey's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 13,807
brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
Send a message via MSN to clutch-monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockefella View Post
Also, I think since you guys have much better petrol, the CTS-V's gas mileage may increase a couple digits. Our 87 is like you're 95 octane.
there's no difference in fuel, only the way you measure the octane rating
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan View Post
In Europe, if someone wants a fast, V8 engined GM, they buy a Monaro or a VXR8...
they don't make the monaro anymore...but the VXR8 is subjectively better looking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lagonda View Post
But nobody wants a V8 engined GM car over here
*can afford to run one, you mean..
__________________
Falling pregnant accidentally is like locking your keys in your car...you're confused, upset, embarrassed to tell anyone - and both instances can be solved using a coathanger.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-10-2008, 04:25 PM
kingofthering's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,838
95616
Send a message via AIM to kingofthering
So?

The GT-R is still faster

(waits for flame war)
__________________
(looks at damaged 2000GT)

They have injured my soul. UNFORGIVABLE!

I'm the king of the ring, not sofas.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-10-2008, 05:19 PM
Rockefella's Avatar
what is this i dont even
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,208
Northern New Jersey
Send a message via AIM to Rockefella Send a message via MSN to Rockefella
Quote:
Originally Posted by clutch-monkey View Post
there's no difference in fuel, only the way you measure the octane rating
Didn't know that. I figured octane ratings were universal.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-10-2008, 05:29 PM
clutch-monkey's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 13,807
brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
Send a message via MSN to clutch-monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockefella View Post
Didn't know that. I figured octane ratings were universal.
America always measures things differently. fahrenheit, net hp, anything imperial..
__________________
Falling pregnant accidentally is like locking your keys in your car...you're confused, upset, embarrassed to tell anyone - and both instances can be solved using a coathanger.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-10-2008, 06:16 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 814
Quote:
Originally Posted by clutch-monkey View Post
America always measures things differently. fahrenheit, net hp, anything imperial..
Hey, we're just being loyal to the Queen... and stiffing her on a gallon of milk.

Actually the octane ratings are different for a good reason. There are two good ways to measure octane. Rather than just settle on one or the other as Europe did, in the US it was decided to combine the two numbers to get an average value. As such the octane numbers are 100% scaleable. Two test samples of fuel may have the same rating using the RON method but not the MON method. As such the two fuel samples would have the same rating in Europe but a different rating in the US.

Octane rating - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-10-2008, 10:02 PM
Turbo.Jenkens's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 622
Redneckville, AL
My only motivations for choosing this over any of its German competitors is that it will likely depreciate to my means quicker, and it comes with a manual.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-11-2008, 01:55 AM
P4g4nite's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 885
Ozland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbo.Jenkens View Post
My only motivations for choosing this over any of its German competitors is that it will likely depreciate to my means quicker, and it comes with a manual.
I need someone to explain something to me.
I can see a lot of american V8 lovers are also fanatical about manual gearshifting, I'm not understanding the attraction when you have 1) unlimited torque everywhere in the modest rev range 2) meaty, clunky shift quality.
On a sporty Honda or something where the powercurve has significance I can understand it, I bet an Auto NSX is not quicker around the 'Ring than it's manual equivalent.
__________________
Horsepower wins races. Torque pulls trailers.

http://www.nuerburgring.de/fileadmin/webcam/webcam.jpg <Live cast from the 'Ring.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-11-2008, 08:41 AM
SlickHolden's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 12,834
Australia.
Send a message via MSN to SlickHolden
Best looking Caddy i have seen....

It's also got GTS rims.
__________________
"Just a matter of time i suppose"

"The elevator is broke, So why don't you test it out"

"I'm not trapped in here with all of you, Your all trapped in here with me"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mercedes C-Class vs. Cadillac CTS MBMaybach Car comparison 30 10-08-2009 06:25 AM
Cadillac CTS Coupe Concept 90ft Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 15 02-26-2008 09:47 AM
Cadillac CTS Matt Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 40 12-03-2007 04:18 PM
2005 Cadillac CTS smith12 General Automotive 0 07-29-2005 03:49 AM
CT's Vacation CHEESE-TACULAR Miscellaneous 7 07-28-2005 06:00 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:25 AM.

  Contact Us - Ultimatecarpage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
© 1998 - 2009 Ultimatecarpage.com - Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1