More Bush/Fleet vs the rest.

[Matra et Alpine]

Originally Posted by Fleet 500

I have a great idea...
Why doesn't UCP do what the person below suggests?
Put A box under the UCP title that says Bush is a "liar," "stole the election," "want to take over the world's oil," etc.

Then I and the other non-Bush bashers won't have to read this nonsense over and over again.

you really take the biscuit FLeet.

WHEN will you stop CLinton-bashing then ?????

I am laughing out loud. You're better than the best comic on the fringe stnad-up venues.

:

I love how THAT letter writer thinks everybody else is a "loopy".
IRONY is not dead and buried in America !!!!!!!!!!!

[Fleet 500]

Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine

you really take the biscuit FLeet.

WHEN will you stop CLinton-bashing then ?????

I am laughing out loud. You're better than the best comic on the fringe stnad-up venues.

:

I love how THAT letter writer thinks everybody else is a "loopy".
IRONY is not dead and buried in America !!!!!!!!!!!

I don't Clinton bash- I state facts about him, like how he sold nuclear materials to North Korea, sold nuclear technology to China and refused to take Bin Laden into custody when given the chance (several times).

BTW, what would you call Robert Kennedy, Jr? He is blaming the hurricane on the Bush administration! The height of loopiness! Lol.

[Fleet 500]

Originally Posted by Rockefella

See quote.

No evidence he "lied" about WMD. And don't give me the Downing Street memos... they have been discredited.

However, I will give you huge praise for having to intelligence to realize that Bush did win the 2000 election fair and square. You are on a much higher plane of rationality compare to the loonies who insist that Bush "rigged the election."

[Rockefella]

Originally Posted by Fleet 500

I don't Clinton bash- I state facts about him, like how he sold nuclear materials to North Korea, sold nuclear technology to China and refused to take Bin Laden into custody when given the chance (several times).

BTW, what would you call Robert Kennedy, Jr? He is blaming the hurricane on the Bush administration! The height of loopiness! Lol.

Ok, so Clinton did that, big deal. Bin Laden didn't represent too much of a threat at the time, and I'm sure if it was that easy to catch him then he would have done it.

IF Kennedy said that, he's an idiot, and shouldn't represent Democrats, same as some Republicans that go to extremes.

[Matra et Alpine]

Originally Posted by Fleet 500

I don't Clinton bash- I state facts about him, like how he sold nuclear materials to North Korea, sold nuclear technology to China and refused to take Bin Laden into custody when given the chance (several times).

HYPOCRIT ALERT !!!!
woop, woop, woop
HYPOCRIT ALERT !!!!

Thats what others are posting about GWB.
Tell me where the 'facts' are in your comment about hima dn Monica being in the sandbox.

LYING HYPOCRIT caught red-handed

BTW, what would you call Robert Kennedy, Jr? He is blaming the hurricane on the Bush administration! The height of loopiness! Lol.

Global warming. It's a bitch.
Emergency preparedness ? How is it in the US. Does the federal government not control that and the budgets or is it left to State ??

and concur with Rocke, unless he can present solid evidence he's a tool to be moaning so soon. Got some links to what he's saying ??????

[Fleet 500]

Originally Posted by Rockefella

Ok, so Clinton did that, big deal. Bin Laden didn't represent too much of a threat at the time, and I'm sure if it was that easy to catch him then he would have done it.

IF Kennedy said that, he's an idiot, and shouldn't represent Democrats, same as some Republicans that go to extremes.

Yeah, right... things were done the pacifist/liberal way- wait until Bin Laden plans and/or engages in some horrible attack instead of taking him in custody when he had the chance!
Much better to wait until 3,000 are killed.

Not "if" Kennedy said that; he did say it.

[Matra et Alpine]

Originally Posted by Fleet 500

Yeah, right... things were done the pacifist/liberal way- wait until Bin Laden plans and/or engages in some horrible attack instead of taking him in custody when he had the chance!
Much better to wait until 3,000 are killed.

You need to study history WITHOUT the rose-tinted glasses on really, FLeet

Not "if" Kennedy said that; he did say it.

Can you provide a link ? Did a search and couldnt' find anything official.

DID come across THIS though -- http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...6/ai_n14657367
GWB cut federal funding for the ACE by $70M for New Orleans reported in JUNE.
Oh dear
Again, happy to see the other side of this story. ( especially as the site the intiial kennedy google found it on had blog entry which claimed they'd shelved a pla for upgrade to handle level 5 hurrucanes - THAT reeked of bias and fabrication )

[Matt]

Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine

So someone who found the only thing of theirs they still had was a portable radio gets shot for wanting to take a little bit of their previous life out of the city with them.

Sheez, Matt, innocent until proven guilty man !!!!

Clearly identified looters - eg people seen to break in and steal, maybe.

BUT even then, so what if they're looting. it might just be the only way they can find food/water to survive ?

Surely the protection of property shoudl NEVER come before life. That they pulled folks from searching for people to protect property is a terrible condemnation of priorities

I specifically said that stealing food and other necessities is perfectly appropriate.

[CSL]

Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine

You need to study history WITHOUT the rose-tinted glasses on really, FLeet

Can you provide a link ? Did a search and couldnt' find anything official.

DID come across THIS though -- http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...6/ai_n14657367
GWB cut federal funding for the ACE by $70M for New Orleans reported in JUNE.
Oh dear
Again, happy to see the other side of this story. ( especially as the site the intiial kennedy google found it on had blog entry which claimed they'd shelved a pla for upgrade to handle level 5 hurrucanes - THAT reeked of bias and fabrication )

the simple fact of the matter is that it shouldve been done long before this past weekend. they gambled and they lost

[Rockefella]

Originally Posted by Fleet 500

Yeah, right... things were done the pacifist/liberal way- wait until Bin Laden plans and/or engages in some horrible attack instead of taking him in custody when he had the chance!
Much better to wait until 3,000 are killed.

Not "if" Kennedy said that; he did say it.

Read the second part of my Kennedy statement, if he'll go to extremes like that, then he shouldn't be taken as a representative of Democrats.

What proof do you have that Clinton could have had him SO easily? I'm sure it must have been very simple when it's taken Bush the better part of 4 years to find him, and nothing still to this day. Maybe it was better not trying to get Bin Laden, when there was little terrorism being spread. (Compared to now)

[crisis]

Bush's old man could have finished the job but the US made such a bloodbath of the highway out of Kuwait hosing everthing that moved including women and children civillians he lost the nerve. What a fvkin family!

[Fleet 500]

Originally Posted by Rockefella

What proof do you have that Clinton could have had him SO easily? I'm sure it must have been very simple when it's taken Bush the better part of 4 years to find him, and nothing still to this day. Maybe it was better not trying to get Bin Laden, when there was little terrorism being spread. (Compared to now)

Oh come on... we've been through this over and over.
Clinton is on tape saying that he couldn't take Bin Laden because the U.S. has no reason to hold him. Obviously, he wouldn't have said that if Bin Laden wasn't offered to him.
I suggest you read the book, "Losing Bin Laden," by Mr. Miniter. It goes through all this in much detail.

[Fleet 500]

Originally Posted by crisis

Bush's old man could have finished the job but the US made such a bloodbath of the highway out of Kuwait hosing everthing that moved including women and children civillians he lost the nerve. What a fvkin family!

He made the mistake of listening to the U.N. and kicking Iraq out of Kuwait, but not invading Iraq and removing Saddam.
Of course, if he did do that back in '91, liberals like you would be calling him a "war-monger," right?

[Fleet 500]

Originally Posted by Rockefella

Ok, so Clinton did that, big deal.

Big deal? He sells nuclear material to N. Korea with the "promise" that they would use it for power, not weapons. Then, naturally, they use it to build weapons. Talk about a dumb President!
And selling nuclear technology to communist China was much smarter!

[Egg Nog]

You guys must not get it. Everybody who is "liberal" is completely out of their minds and in reality don't actually care for any part of humanity at all. This is obvious because they are so loony. Republicans are all right because they must be right.