Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > General forums > Multimedia


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:48 AM
wwgkd's Avatar
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 267
Moscow, Idaho
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coventrysucks View Post
Context will have an influence on how people respond to you. Especially considering the high quality of your initial contribution to the thread, it is not surprising that people may not guess that your later posts are backed up by professional opinions, and therefore are less likely to respond in the same way.



Can you not extrapolate the answer from the data you already have?
True, my initial posts were overly brief, but I was trying to avoid writing large essays to answer short questions. Ended up having to do a lot more work than if I had just started out correctly, so perhaps then wasn't the best time to get lazy.

Well, even though the manufacturers will express their data as a straight function of Nm/Degrees, it's not really that simple here. As the frame flexes members that had no or insignificant forces acting upon them initially begin to take force loads of their own and this effects the overall forces in a nonlinear manner. So it's not really proportionate to the forces. I messed around with the software we have for a few minutes, but I couldn't find an easy way of finding out the forces required for 5 inches, since that's kind of backwards to what he have been using it for. I'm not sure that the frame could support a flex of 5 inches, or if members would start to buckle.

If you really wanted to you could look up the manufacturers numbers and use the Nm/Degree equation with a little trig for the length of flex. It wouldn't tell you real world forces such as g's sustained, but you'd at least have a very rough idea of what forces would have to act on the frame. If it wasn't so close to finals week I'd spend more time on this, but I'm beginning to think that going for a second major as an undergrad while I'm doing grad work may have been a mistake. The only reason I've been getting on this site is that I need a chance to uncross my eyes every once in a while.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
all cars all years 0-60 and 1/4mile time matheus General Automotive 48 12-28-2007 06:02 PM
Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder Matt Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 43 03-08-2007 02:26 PM
C&D review Evo 9. Quiggs General Automotive 23 07-05-2006 06:44 AM
Mitsubishi Sportback Concept porlamfer Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 14 09-27-2005 01:09 AM
Road & Track, Audi S2 Vs BMW M3 SE Vs MB 190E 2.5-16 Evo II Vaigra Multimedia 6 05-16-2005 09:43 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:09 AM.

  Contact Us - Ultimatecarpage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
© 1998 - 2008 Ultimatecarpage.com - LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0