Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > Automotive forums > Racing forums


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:05 PM
Novice
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrKipling
WRC cars are faster across a stage than a Group B car... people often quote the power figure of a WRC car at 300bhp, ten forget to mentio they also produce 500-600 ft/lbs of torque.

Also, all the funky diffs and tyre technology would make a huge difference. Still it would be an interesting race.
To the best of my knowledge, a late Group B car has never raced a modern WRC car on a tight, twisty modern WRC stage or a fast, open Group B stage. A 1986 quattro S1 would not match a modern WRC car on a modern WRC stage. But how would a 300(ish)bhp WRC car get anywhere near a 600(ish) quattro on a forest fireroad? Whilst the quattro had big power, it was always a bit of lumbering beast, even in SWB form. The performance of Group B cars can be measured against modern rally cars by comparing results at National level in the UK, 6R4s running at reduced power can still beat modern cars. Mid-engine is worth a lot on tight stages.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:38 PM
Novice
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferrer
It's all in the drivetrain technology, it's very funny to see 4 wheel drive Group B rallycars going around tight tarmac hairpins, they are pathetic.
Why would anyone want to watch Group B cars on tight, tarmac hairpins? Group B was about fast, open stages, that's why they needed power and stability. Having said that, have you watched the videos I linked to? The T16 was nimble, even with mid-1980s tyres.
Until recently, Pat Doran's RS200 was more than competitive in rallycross; mid-engine, big power and modern tyres can get a 20 year old design around a tight, semi-tarmac course at speed. Pat Doran's RS200 has now been banned from rallycross.

Go-karts are fast on tight, tarmac hairpins
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 07-24-2006, 02:03 PM
MrKipling's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,404
51dg 45' 08.16" N : 0dg 20' 19.33" W
Ah yeah, but 6R4s on the BRC aren't being driven by Rohrl, Airikalla, Toivenen et al, and the WRC cars aren't being driven be Loeb, McRae or Makkinen.

Tyre technology is a widely overlooked aspect of advances in motor sport - why do you think F1 car cornering speeds are so much quicker this year than they have been - despite the V8s and lower downforce?

And those RS200s in Rally Cross are not really Group B cars - more like sillhouette racers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickyredmire
Go-karts are fast on tight, tarmac hairpins
Yeah, but go karts don't also go fast round sweeping gravel roads taking an utter battering.

Little factoid: you could pile 10 road-going Scoobs on top of the Impreza WRC before it collapsed. Stiff core.
__________________
www.crash.net/motoring/roadcars/news/home/

Last edited by MrKipling; 07-24-2006 at 02:05 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 07-24-2006, 03:28 PM
Ferrer's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,047
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickyredmire
Why would anyone want to watch Group B cars on tight, tarmac hairpins? Group B was about fast, open stages, that's why they needed power and stability. Having said that, have you watched the videos I linked to? The T16 was nimble, even with mid-1980s tyres.
Until recently, Pat Doran's RS200 was more than competitive in rallycross; mid-engine, big power and modern tyres can get a 20 year old design around a tight, semi-tarmac course at speed. Pat Doran's RS200 has now been banned from rallycross.

Go-karts are fast on tight, tarmac hairpins
There's rally called the Tour de Corse. And there's saying which goes like this: the longest staright in Corsica is the airport track in Ajaccio...
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 07-24-2006, 03:59 PM
Novice
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6
Quote:
Ah yeah, but 6R4s on the BRC aren't being driven by Rohrl, Airikalla, Toivenen et al, and the WRC cars aren't being driven be Loeb, McRae or Makkinen.
Absolutely, always a difficult comparison to make.

F1 car and tyre manufacturers have been able to produce cars that exceed the ability of a driver for years, but the high G forces produced would cause the drivers to pass out without G suits. In some ways, tyre design in F1 has gone backwards recently.

AFAIK, the Ford RS200s in rallycross are modified Ford RS200s. Technically, they are not Group B cars because Group B ceased to exist after 1986, but they are still close to the original vehicles produced by Ford, in fact they probably represent what the RS200 would have become if Group B was allowed to continue.

Quote:
Yeah, but go karts don't also go fast round sweeping gravel roads taking an utter battering
Fast, sweeping gravel roads? So that's not a WRC stage then?

Quote:
Little factoid: you could pile 10 road-going Scoobs on top of the Impreza WRC before it collapsed. Stiff core.
Overweight then?
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 07-24-2006, 05:02 PM
MrKipling's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,404
51dg 45' 08.16" N : 0dg 20' 19.33" W
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickyredmire
in fact they probably represent what the RS200 would have become if Group B was allowed to continue.
Yep, that's almost certainly true. In fact I'm sure the manufacturer's would have ended up being even more extreme!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickyredmire
Fast, sweeping gravel roads? So that's not a WRC stage then?
No, sorry (my bad), my point was that the modern WRC cars excel at whatever they have to, and are still extremely quick in a straight line - the torque figures are silly and suspension has come on so far, they can carry much more speed over horrid terrain. Have you seen how low the Focus is this year?! How is that possible?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickyredmire
Overweight then?
No, it'll be bang on the weight limit. WRC cars bear as much resemblance (structually) to their road-going counterparts as a DTM car does. Upwards from the chassis they're basically a rollcage with panels welded to it! Totally custom built from the ground up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickyredmire
In some ways, tyre design in F1 has gone backwards recently.
No, tyre development has come on enormous amounts, cornering speeds have been getting higher and higher for years. They even went up last year... and that's not all down to aero. In fact, F1 cars have less downforce than last year and cornering speeds are still higher.
__________________
www.crash.net/motoring/roadcars/news/home/
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 07-24-2006, 07:31 PM
2ndclasscitizen's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,575
Sydney, Down Under
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrKipling
Little factoid: you could pile 10 road-going Scoobs on top of the Impreza WRC before it collapsed. Stiff core.
That makes Solberg's crash in Germany a year or two ago even more impressive!
__________________
Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
– Hunter Thompson
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 07-24-2006, 09:15 PM
kingofthering's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,838
95616
Send a message via AIM to kingofthering
what would happen if the FIA revived group B today? with today's tech it should be pretty cool and it should be safer and faster.
__________________
(looks at damaged 2000GT)

They have injured my soul. UNFORGIVABLE!

I'm the king of the ring, not sofas.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 07-24-2006, 10:47 PM
2ndclasscitizen's Avatar
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,575
Sydney, Down Under
They'd just be WRC cars with a front spoiler. All the FIA really has to do is take away the restrictors and let them use active diffs again
__________________
Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
– Hunter Thompson
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 07-25-2006, 04:03 AM
McReis's Avatar
The Special One
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,544
Porto - Portugal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferrer
That said in the 1986 Portuguese Rally the time recorded in Estoril by Henri Toivonen and his works Lancia Delta S4 would have given him 6th place on the grip of the F1 Grand Prix...
That's a myth of wich there is no proof. Estoril Circuit has no record of that lap time and recently, a book about Portugal Rally mentions that.
I really doubt it, since the drivers never attacked the Estoril circuit with much determination. It was a stage with the single purpose of dictating the starting order, and as the cars were not set up for that kind of driving, they never pushed the cars too much. Estoril also has a big straight and is a reasonably fast circuit. How could a rally car, short geared as they are, not lose lots of seconds in the fast parts when compaired to a F1 car?
__________________
Money can't buy you friends, but you do get a better class of enemy.
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 07-26-2006, 08:43 AM
Ferrer's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,047
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Quote:
Originally Posted by McReis
That's a myth of wich there is no proof. Estoril Circuit has no record of that lap time and recently, a book about Portugal Rally mentions that.
I really doubt it, since the drivers never attacked the Estoril circuit with much determination. It was a stage with the single purpose of dictating the starting order, and as the cars were not set up for that kind of driving, they never pushed the cars too much. Estoril also has a big straight and is a reasonably fast circuit. How could a rally car, short geared as they are, not lose lots of seconds in the fast parts when compaired to a F1 car?
You're very probably right, in truth I only posted the info, which I read somewhere, but I have nothing to back it. Still in some ways Group B car were even more advanced than F1 cars...
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 07-28-2006, 07:53 PM
Novice
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2
In comparing GrpB and WRC times, the GrpB would be quicker on the more open stages ie up Pikes Peak. The WRC would be quicker on the stages used these days as they are a much slower stage with a average speed meant to be less than 120kph. The WRC handles a lot better and puts it's power down better. Tyres also have developed a huge amount since then.

The modern WRC is not geared for flat out speed but rather acceleration out of corners.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 06-24-2007, 04:23 PM
Matra et Alpine's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,538
nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
Nice video of the Mazda RX-7 GroupB version on NZ Rally ......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfA7P3rfaA4&NR=1
__________________
Understeer is hitting the wall with the front of the car
- Oversteer is hitting the wall with the rear of the car
- - Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall
- - - Torque is how far you push wall
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Groub B Rally Cars Cotterik Multimedia 60 06-07-2006 08:42 AM
Prodrive Subaru Impreza Group N dydzi Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 12 09-21-2005 05:18 AM
Group N vs Open vs WRC KnifeEdge_2K1 Technical forums 1 02-08-2005 03:05 PM
Who are the top 10 Australasian racing drivers of today and all time? motorsportnerd General Automotive 213 04-30-2004 04:38 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:02 PM.

  Contact Us - Ultimatecarpage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
© 1998 - 2009 Ultimatecarpage.com - Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1