Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > General automotive > Racing forums


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 11-09-2003, 11:13 AM
henk4's Avatar
very senior member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 19,271
Rozenburg, Holland
Quote:
Originally posted by DasModell
the 705 NM ..it seams a bit to much ...
you could well have a point there, I just took the figure for granted. It looks more like a figure for a turbo engine or a diesel.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-10-2003, 05:16 AM
DasModell's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,028
Romania Bucharest
Send a message via Yahoo to DasModell
no N/A petrol engine that i know has more then 130 Nm/L ..
__________________
There is no terrible way of winning
there is just winning
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-10-2003, 05:21 AM
henk4's Avatar
very senior member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 19,271
Rozenburg, Holland
yes, b.t.w. did you get my email that I sent you through the ten tenths forum?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-10-2003, 05:39 AM
DasModell's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,028
Romania Bucharest
Send a message via Yahoo to DasModell
yes .. and i replied ..
did another try . i've put it in the sports;car&Gt forum also .. maybe ..
__________________
There is no terrible way of winning
there is just winning
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-10-2003, 05:41 AM
henk4's Avatar
very senior member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 19,271
Rozenburg, Holland
so I noticed now, not Dani either
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-10-2003, 05:57 AM
DasModell's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,028
Romania Bucharest
Send a message via Yahoo to DasModell
is dani filth a romanian name .. don;t think so
__________________
There is no terrible way of winning
there is just winning
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-10-2003, 06:16 AM
henk4's Avatar
very senior member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 19,271
Rozenburg, Holland
to me it's a filthy name, I'll be in Romania in the final week of November, most likely in Bucurest only, may be Constanza too.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-10-2003, 06:41 AM
DasModell's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,028
Romania Bucharest
Send a message via Yahoo to DasModell
lol .. yeah .. i think that what it is .. a filthy name . .. it a british band vocal name ... but i'm afraid i'm stuck witt it .. on ten-tenths .. ... on other forums .. thwy call me "modelu" de la DasModell

you said you've been around before .. did you have the pleasure to taste our wonderful wines ????? home made????
__________________
There is no terrible way of winning
there is just winning
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-10-2003, 06:53 AM
henk4's Avatar
very senior member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 19,271
Rozenburg, Holland
I had some, but it didn't make a lasting impression. (neither negative nor positive).
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-11-2003, 05:53 PM
Novice
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1
Had to reply to this one. The torque of an F1 engine is approx 325 to 375Nm, right about what Reek says

As for the torque/horsepower coments, have a look at the following, this should sort you out.

http://www.yawpower.com/tqvshp.html

Happy reading!

Last edited by Willster127; 11-11-2003 at 05:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-15-2003, 12:23 PM
DasModell's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,028
Romania Bucharest
Send a message via Yahoo to DasModell
Lotus 49 Cosworth DFV power/torque curves ..



using the formula ... BHP = torque X engine_speed / 5252 .. u get 233 lb-ft ... blah .. i didn;t do the math .. myself .. can someone convert those to normal figures .. i mean . Nm ...
anyway .. 233 lb-ft ... at max power rev .. as u can see in the graph ... but max torque is something around .. 250 ... at aprox. 7000 rpm
__________________
There is no terrible way of winning
there is just winning
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-19-2003, 04:02 PM
Novice
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 18
Location: New Zealand
400 BHP ~ 300kW
250 LbFt ~ 336Nm

So the torque from the DFV isn't much lower than current engines, but because it developed it at half the rpm, that's why it develops about half the power. Which again proves that Power is more important for a race-car to accelerate...
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-09-2004, 07:00 AM
JJ72's Avatar
Novice
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 22
Location: Hong Kong
Send a message via ICQ to JJ72
Torque is power.
Horsepower is the work done.

you need torque to get the acceleration while Horsepower determines how fast you can accelerate with that force...actully mush more than that but i can't explain it well.

and probably a wrong explanation too.

but the need of torque correspond to the mass of the vehicle.
a light car require less torque to accelerate. and for a F1 machine, which is surely very light, can demand less Torque.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-14-2004, 06:45 PM
Novice
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14
Bravo, excellent article good job figuring it out. Excellent discussion here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:00 AM.

  Contact Us - Ultimatecarpage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
© 1998 - 2008 Ultimatecarpage.com - LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0