|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Power/Torque on a F1 car?
What is the maximum power output on a F1 car?
I know that nowadays, most of them have about 800bhp. I heard that in the time the F1 cars had turbo's, the cars had more than 1000bhp, is this true? Also, what's the torque on a F1 car?
__________________
Dreaming of a Peugeot 106 Rallye... |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
power is rumoured that has reached +900 BHP but the torque figures are low . maybe 400-500 Nm ..
Turbo .. it would depend on boost ... and restrictors .. but in the Turbo era the power reached those fugures in qulifying trim ...
__________________
There is no terrible way of winning there is just winning |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
i think i heard the commentator during the Indy F1 say that the Williams BMW has something around 920-960 hp. I cant remember exactly what he said, but it was something in that range.
__________________
----R.I.P---- "Misho Ratio" 2003 - 2004 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
given Power = Torque*angular velocity
Say an F1 engine is giving 950bhp at 19,000 rpm then 19,000*2*pi / 60 * T = 950*745 rearranging : T~356Nm of torque Depending on what publications you read, the 1.5 Turbo engines of the Mid-80s had between 1200-1400bhp in qualifying trim. I hope my maths is right... Last edited by ReeK; 11-19-2003 at 04:00 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
i dont think its as simple as that to figure out the torque, the most accurate way would just be to stick the bloody engine on a dyno. all thats just guesswork
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
problem is that max torque is not reached at same rpm as max power
__________________
There is no terrible way of winning there is just winning |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
because from what i understand with that formula you calculated the torque at max power . and it;s not max torque ...
__________________
There is no terrible way of winning there is just winning |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well F1 teams appear to not worry about torque at all, power determines acceleration.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
yeah indeed .. they use so little rpm range ...
__________________
There is no terrible way of winning there is just winning |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
I Love These Races!!! www.insideracing.com.br The 56th member of this Forum. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Power is proportional to the rate of angular ACCELERATION. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
The 3.5 litre Renault V10 engine, (as used in the Espace F1, see elsewhere on this site) produced 800 BHP and 705 NM. (8 years ago). The much more developed 3 litre engines appear to have 900 BHP and based on the above could have about the same amount of torque. Corresponding revs is a guess but could be in the order of 18000 and 13-14000 respectively.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
the 705 NM ..it seams a bit to much ...
__________________
There is no terrible way of winning there is just winning |