Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Metallic vs. Non-Metallic Paint

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    931

    Metallic vs. Non-Metallic Paint

    Beside the aesthetic differences between the two is their any difference in durability or makeup that would make metallic paints better? Do they last longer or resist oxidation more readily than non-metallic paints? If not why do car manufacturers charge so much extra for it?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    6,065
    Quote Originally Posted by MRR View Post
    Beside the aesthetic differences between the two is their any difference in durability or makeup that would make metallic paints better? Do they last longer or resist oxidation more readily than non-metallic paints? If not why do car manufacturers charge so much extra for it?
    No there isn't. They all use the same tint, balancer/binder, reducer. The metallic part is just aluminum tint. A solid color is easier to paint than a metallic one. The cost of the paint is usually more when its a metallic also.
    "We went to Wnedy's. I had chicken nuggest." ~ Quiggs

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    It this point there's very little cost difference between metallic and non-metallic, and since the paint work is all done by machines its easy to give the car a consistent paint job. In the old days however metallic paints used to fade after a few years. In addition, since the paint formulas weren't as exact as today, so if a metallic car was damaged it was hard to match the paint. A good way to look at it is today almost half the MB 300SL on the road are silver, but at the time silver was a very rare colour on those cars because buyers knew if they damaged the car it would be hard to repaint it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Posts
    7,833
    The cost is never in the materials or the equipment and labor used. Nowadays the margins on cars are so insanely narrow that most large volume manufacturers lose a little money on every "standard" car they sell. To make up for this and still make profit the prices of the options are usually very high. My teachers explained that margins of 5-6-700% profit are very common. Say the OEM pays 200€ for the better paint, they can easily charge 1500€ to the customer. It's a small sales trick. People will first look at the base price, then they'll start negotiating and find out it might be more expensive because of the options. They will rarely buy it that way because it gives a inferior feeling when going through the options list. About 1-2% of cars sold comes completely standard, with no options I have been told.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. BF falcon and SY Territory realeased october
    By syko in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 08-21-2005, 01:12 AM
  2. Foreign residue on paint
    By QBridge in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-13-2005, 08:10 AM
  3. paint tips
    By Batmobile_Turbo in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-18-2004, 05:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •