Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: 288 GTO Competitor?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Québec
    Posts
    5,749

    288 GTO Competitor?

    I was having an argument with Cyco whether or not the Porsche 959 was a competitor to the Ferrari 288 GTO. Cyco says it wasn't, I say it was. The 288 GTO was produced from 1984 to 1985, and the 959 from 1986 to 1990. In my opinion the 959 was Porsche's answer to the 288 GTO, thus a 288 GTO competitor. Cyco thinks the 959 competitor was rather the Ferrari F40, which was introduced in 1987. To me, the F40 was just Ferrari's answer to the 959, therefore the 959 both competed with the 288 GTO and the F40.

    What do you guys think?
    Reginald *IB4R* says:
    it was a beautiful 35 seconds.
    David says:
    that's what she said

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    14,579
    No.

    the F40 was not just Ferrari's answer to the 959 - it was introduced to mark 40 years of Ferrari's existence.

    the 959 was introduced to compete in Group B. of course we know what happened to that, so they built it into a road car.

    They may have been out about the same time - with similar price tags. but i'd hardly call them competitors.
    <cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Québec
    Posts
    5,749
    Quote Originally Posted by IBrake4Rainbows View Post
    the F40 was not just Ferrari's answer to the 959 - it was introduced to mark 40 years of Ferrari's existence.
    Yeah, I know it wasn't only the answer to the 959. What I mean is that when it was released it was inevitably compared to the 959, or made a competitor.
    Reginald *IB4R* says:
    it was a beautiful 35 seconds.
    David says:
    that's what she said

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    14,579
    Sure...inevitable comparisons are.....well, you know.

    but it wasn't built after Ferrari saw the 959 and said "hey.....let's beat that".
    <cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Ansião - Portugal
    Posts
    241
    As said before, 959 might be compared to Delta s4, 205 t16 or RS200, but not to any Ferrari of that period. F40 was compared to the 959, but neither of their series versions was an answer to any other existing car. They were launched by the same time and both were quite fast and expensive. That's all. Comparing a 288 GTO or an F40 to the 959 just doesn't make sense, in my opinion. By the way, and also in my opinion, the 959 remains the most incredible car ever built, by its technology, performance and design. But, as I stated, that's just my (probably irracional and certainly pashionate) opinion.

    Ferrari saw the 959 and said "hey.....let's beat that".
    Which, by the way...they didn't...
    orangeferrari.blog.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    6,534
    The 959 was built to be Porsche's technological Tour de Force. It was comfortable, possible to live with, and.. such. The Ferarris were stripped out to go fast. There was a 288 Evo created for possible Group B contention, but obviously that didn't happen. Essentially completely different machines created to go really fast in the vein that the repective companies like to exhibit themselves.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    14,579
    Quote Originally Posted by Leo_Ant View Post

    Which, by the way...they didn't...
    I'd read the whole comment again.
    <cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    I wouldn't use the word "competitor." "Competitor" implies Ferrari was trying to beat Porsche with sales or on the track when the fact is both the 959 and the F40 sold very well and, as far as I know, never met on the track. Further more, the idea of the 959 was to create a car with world beating performance and everyday civility, while the idea of the F40 was to give Ferrari's customers a racecar experience for the road. That being said, I do think the Porsche 959 inspired Ferrari to really push their technological limits in creating the F40.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Ansião - Portugal
    Posts
    241
    I'd read the whole comment again.
    I meant that, in my opinion, they didn't beat the 959, also because they weren't even competitors. Sorry if I can't make myself clear. It's just to late in Portugal right now to insist on thinking
    orangeferrari.blog.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    14,579
    Thats fine - i just didn't want to be misquoted
    <cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,272
    Both the 959 and 288 GTO were intended to compete in Group B sports car racing; hence the "O" - the road car was the homologation for the intended racer.

    So, yes, if Group B sports cars had gone ahead they would have been direct competitors.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Versions of the 959 did the Paris-Dakar...
    Both cars were intended for Group B. Ferrari had some earlier rallye forays with 308/328 models...
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    so the 959 was going to compete with the 288 in group B, but instead competed withthe F40 on the roads?
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by clutch-monkey View Post
    so the 959 was going to compete with the 288 in group B, but instead competed withthe F40 on the roads?
    The F40 was basically a raw variant of the 288 GTO. From the latter they built about 3-4 Evolutione versions, which formed the basis for the F40. While the Porsche was a rather civilised but very fast and competent road car, the F40 was more of a track car for the road....and sold better than the Porsche...
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by clutch-monkey View Post
    so the 959 was going to compete with the 288 in group B, but instead competed withthe F40 on the roads?
    Bingo.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 1:18th Scale Die-Cast Models
    By Porsche959 in forum Model cars
    Replies: 417
    Last Post: 04-04-2018, 07:13 AM
  2. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-24-2007, 05:37 AM
  3. 1/18 scale diecast models
    By Manik in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-14-2006, 12:05 AM
  4. enzo, f50, f40, 288 gto owner's manual
    By kitkat in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 04-27-2006, 11:13 PM
  5. 288 GTO Evoluzione and Silver F50
    By lfb666 in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-30-2004, 12:56 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •