I have to say I am very disappointed in you Brad.
If you trully believe all that you wrote in your previous post then I really have lost some of my respect for you as a fellow inventor/engineer.
This is not the place to get into a big discussion about power and torque and there relation (as that has been done ad nauseum in other threads). However I would like to make a few counter-points (if you will) to put out there and I really hope that you will read what I have to say and actually think about it for awhile with an open mind (which requires that you completely forget the notion that you have in your head that you are right for just alittle while).
Originally Posted by
revetec
Power is a calculation of torque considering RPM.
While this is technically correct the implied context is not. Power is the rate at which work can be done. This means that if you have more power you can do one of two things: you can either do the same amount of work in less time or you can do more work in the same amount of time.
Originally Posted by
revetec
Acceleration is a direct link with the torque you have.
As that statement stands it is incorrect. There is no direct relation between engine torque and vehicle acceleration (i.e. 200lbs-ft. of torque does not incur the same rate of acceleration in all vehicles of the same mass). However there is a direct relation between torque at the wheels and acceleration and this is because torque at the wheels is a function of power. Acceleration has a direct relation to power, especially power at the wheels (i.e 200HP at the wheels will incur the same rate of acceleration in all vehicles of the same mass).
Originally Posted by
revetec
So as a comparison you will get slightly better acceleration with the 100hp engine at 2,500rpm than the 200hp engine at 5,500rpm.
Unfortunately this is also lacking in vital information to be valid in its own right (meaning it is not valid as it stands). If the speed is equal in both cases then the 200HP engined vehicle is producing greater torque at the wheels. Lets say the wheel speed is 1000RPM, then the 100HP engine can only produce 2.5 times the engine torque at the wheels (525lbs-ft.) but the 200HP engine is able to produce 5.5 times engine torque at the wheels (1050.5lbs-ft.). If the gearing is the same for both then the 200HP engine is traveling at much greater velocity then the 100HP engine and the comparison of rate of acceleration is no longer apples to apples.
Originally Posted by
revetec
If you look at a diesel engine in a truck. If you have a 250hp (186kW) engine with a peak torque of 596ftlb@2,200rpm (800Nm) the truck is quite able to pull a 10 tonne load. A petrol engine that produces 250hp or 186kW@6,000rpm has 218ftlb@6,000rpm (300Nm). Even though the power is the same, the pulling power is far less and that engine will not pull a 10 tonne load.
Unfortunately you are again totally incorrect. regardless of the RPM at which peak power occurs if you have two 250HP engines then they will perform exactly equally. This is basic physics. "There is no such thing as a free lunch" is the saying. A petrol engine that makes 250HP at 6000RPM is equally capable of hauling 10 tonnes as a diesel engine that makes 250HP at 2200RPM, all it needs is gearing that allows it to run at 6000RPM at the same vehicle speed as the diesel would be traveling at 2200RPM. Again if the wheel speed was 1000RPM then both engines would be able to produce 1313lbs-ft. at the wheels. (bare in mind the 250HP petrol engine is making closer to 218.83333lbs-ft. of torque at 6000RPM to make 250HP and the diesel is making 596.81818lbs-ft. at 2200RPM to make 250HP).
Originally Posted by
revetec
Shane is waiting for you to call him on Skype or receiving an email.
I have been quite busy lately (even though this is supposed to be a holiday week for me) I will get around to it quite soon though (within the next day or so).
Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
Engine torque is an illusion.