Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: New Chrysler Imperial

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    243

    New Chrysler Imperial



    From AutoWeek

    The Chrysler Imperial concept.

    At the opposite extreme lies the luxurious Imperial riding on a 123-inch wheelbase, a three-inch stretch over the 300C. To achieve the proper proportions for the concept, the overall length grows 17 inches to 214 inches, and the overall height is six inches taller than a 300C. The car rides on massive 22-inch turbine-finned wheels and tires, with passengers sitting nearly seven inches higher than in the 300C.

    Envisioned as a “noble” yet attainable flagship positioned a cut above the 300C (“It’s a six-figure image but at a much lower price,” says Tremont), the concept designed in Chrysler’s Auburn Hills studio doesn’t mimic Imperials of the past, but it does draw on some of the styling cues from those older cars. It also carries expressive attributes from Chrysler’s long line of concept cars, from the 1953 d’Elegance to the Fire-power that premiered at last year’s Detroit show.

    Among the design details incorporated into the concept: the long flowing hood and front end dominated by an upright radiator and strong horizontal grille; brushed and polished aluminum pods that evoke free-standing headlamps of Imperials from the 1930s and 1960s; circular LED taillights with floating outer rings that bring back the “gun sight” taillight look of early 1960s Imperials; and a roofline pulled rearward to enlarge the cabin and create a strong profile.

    The wide-open, B-pillar-less doors allow a panoramic view of the show car’s opulent four-seat, two-tone interior, where no expense is spared when it comes to use of leather, suede, California burl wood accents and satin-finished aluminum. Designers also paid considerable attention to handcrafted components like the sculptured instrument panel with large dual gauges, coved ceiling, and the floating oval armrests in the doors, all bathed in warm light.

    Dynamically, Imperial also is diametrically opposed to Challenger, with the latter adopting a full-throated roar while the former is loaded with sound-deadening insulation and is tuned for smooth and silent running. But even in its subtlety, the stately Imperial is more driver’s car than chauffeur-driven limousine, says Chrysler design chief Trevor Creed. Power for the concept comes from the standard 5.7-liter, 340-hp, 390-lb-ft Hemi V8, linked to a five-speed transmission lifted from the Mercedes E-Class.

    “This is the car for somebody who has made it, who takes great pleasure in driving from place to place,” says Creed.

    Though Chrysler execs won’t commit to production plans for either car, there are obvious advantages to building the concepts on the so-called LX platform that underpins the wildly successful 300C, Dodge Magnum and Charger production cars. Not only does using existing hardware help contain the astronomical cost of building show cars, but in the event one or both concepts gets the green light, Chrysler has a much easier path to building production versions, and gets even more return on its engineering and tooling investment in the rear-drive LX platform.

    “These are strictly concepts, but we like to see people get excited because it might help make the case to take one or the other to production,” says Tremont. “There will be a completely different draw to these cars—the Mopar followers will have their Challenger, and the Imperial will appeal to a completely different audience. But they will both stimulate people’s thought processes about what could be a Chrysler.”

    We can only hope that, given a few inches, Chrysler designers and product planners will take the whole foot—and mash it on the accelerator all the way to the showroom.
    Last edited by Classic Anycar; 01-05-2006 at 03:51 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    South England
    Posts
    685
    Looks like a cheap Rolls-Royce Phantom... Although the front looks a bit like a Dodge Magnum...
    You type without knowledge, you are 'a keyboard warrior - lots of mouth, little brain....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    9,465
    I think I just threw up.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,567
    I almost threw up. Ill be holding it in, so I can throw up all over that car instead.
    All about the t-tops

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    CA, San-Jose,
    Posts
    200
    wish I havent opened this thread...
    ''The ends justify the means''- Niccolo Machiavelli-d_Evil's Advocate

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Goshen, IN
    Posts
    3,377
    I just ate dinner too...that thing is fugly.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,697
    I think RR should sue them for all of the money Daimler has.
    2011 Honda Civic Si

    ATHEIST and damn proud of it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Lawrenceville, GA
    Posts
    501
    I hope Benz doesn't get any ideas or did they already?
    Real cars are not FWD.
    FWD at it's best -
    http://videos.streetfire.net/video/6FBCAADF-B7CB-432C-B938-01EB06BD83CE.htm

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Living the good life in Antarctica.
    Posts
    2,827
    Damn...Theyve taken alot of influence from Rolls, but made it ugly. It might look better in the metal and in another colour...something brighter!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Lawrenceville, GA
    Posts
    501
    Quote Originally Posted by ADRENALINE
    Damn...Theyve taken alot of influence from Rolls, but made it ugly. It might look better in the metal and in another colour...something brighter!!
    Nothing will save this car. Chrysler just needs to die.
    Real cars are not FWD.
    FWD at it's best -
    http://videos.streetfire.net/video/6FBCAADF-B7CB-432C-B938-01EB06BD83CE.htm

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Living the good life in Antarctica.
    Posts
    2,827
    Quote Originally Posted by QBridge
    Nothing will save this car. Chrysler just needs to die.
    LOL maybe this car needs to die, not sure about chrysler needing to die though

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    3,022
    burn it, send it to hell.
    Who killed the Electric Car?
    GO HABS GO!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,552
    This is one car WCC would probably improve upon. Slam it so it's scraping the street and bolt on some hideous 26" chrome wheels. How about some eyelids?

    ^^^Challenge for the chopsters^^^
    "Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Guatemala City
    Posts
    709
    man I don't know how MB can be with Chrysler this car is an insult to RR
    ________
    HOW TO ROLL BLUNTS
    Last edited by hec16; 08-20-2011 at 08:47 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    check the pantry...
    Posts
    1,916
    ahhh silly americans, its good to be aussie right now
    House said the perfect woman was a man...now im all confused!!

    What is a mile long and hasn't had sex?
    - The line for the PS3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Imperial strikes back!
    By Revo in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-26-2005, 09:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •