View Poll Results: Pick the race winner

Voters
24. You may not vote on this poll
  • Nissan Skyline GTR R34

    21 87.50%
  • Mitsubishi 3000GT

    3 12.50%
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 108

Thread: Nissan Skyline GTR R34 vs Mistsubishi 3000GT

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    341
    The early 3000GT's like in Juiced looked crap. The later models looked better. But it doesn't matter because the Skyline's better, against the later or older model.
    Join V8SuperChat NOW!
    http://vee-eight.super-forum.net

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    but when about a gazillion people drive skylines something different is welcome..
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    u.s.a
    Posts
    209
    Quote Originally Posted by HSVLVR
    The early 3000GT's like in Juiced looked crap. The later models looked better. But it doesn't matter because the Skyline's better, against the later or older model.
    lol.the latter modles are the same cars with diffrent head light and bumper.and skyline is not better.only the R33r and R34 GT-R are faster in corners.still vr4 has stronger engine.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    341
    But it doesn't change the fact that it's the exact same car.
    Join V8SuperChat NOW!
    http://vee-eight.super-forum.net

  5. #65
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA, Colorado, Vallecito Lake
    Posts
    3,831
    I dunno about you guys but I love the styling of the 3000gt always have. As in a battle, The 3000 has a lot of little gadgets not mentioned yet, besides the all-wheel steering and all-wheel drive, its got active aero dynamics, 94-97 (I think). It would lower a front spoiler down above a certain speed and increase the downforce at the back. Now whether they will make much of a difference compared with the huge weight, I dont know. But as far with a car I would drive every day ->3000gt vr-4 but as the fastest around the track, I think the skyline may pull ahead because of more advanced technology.
    "Horsepower sells motor cars, but torque wins motor races."
    -Carrol Shelby

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    u.s.a
    Posts
    209
    Quote Originally Posted by Sledgehammer
    I dunno about you guys but I love the styling of the 3000gt always have. As in a battle, The 3000 has a lot of little gadgets not mentioned yet, besides the all-wheel steering and all-wheel drive, its got active aero dynamics, 94-97 (I think). It would lower a front spoiler down above a certain speed and increase the downforce at the back. Now whether they will make much of a difference compared with the huge weight, I dont know. But as far with a car I would drive every day ->3000gt vr-4 but as the fastest around the track, I think the skyline may pull ahead because of more advanced technology.
    yep vr4 has alot of options that skyline don't .like that active spoiler on the front and back wich are from 1990 to 1996 it works from 50+ mph..the car will ge lower from 80+ mph ,it has ESC,it has active muffler and alot more.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Californian by nature, living in Teggsas.
    Posts
    4,130
    I prefer the Skyline's body, but the Mitsu's 3.0l TT if I had to use it as a daily driver (I'm no track fiend, so that doesn't even enter the equation for me here). On that basis, it's pretty had to dicide between the two...

    The killer is that I'd have to import the Skyline here which would be ridiculously expensive.

    Win = Mitsu.
    An it harm none, do as ye will

    Approximately 79% of statistics are made up.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5
    Ok, the skyline once held the fastest lap time on the "Ring" for a production car, so I would have to go with the R34. The VR4 is too fat and heavy to beat up a R34. The VR4 is simply over ratted.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    Quote Originally Posted by 96BattleWagon
    Ok, the skyline once held the fastest lap time on the "Ring" for a production car, so I would have to go with the R34. The VR4 is too fat and heavy to beat up a R34. The VR4 is simply over ratted.
    it was unofficial. Plus, the R34's pretty heavy, so it's probably as heavy as the VR4.
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    754
    Quote Originally Posted by Niko_Fx
    3000 GT VR-4?

    You guys answer as if there was no competition whatsoever.

    3000GT VR-4 = 3810lbs - 320hp - 315lbs torque = 0.083bhp/lbs
    R34 = 3672lbs - 280hp - 289lbs torque = 0.076bhp/lbs



    Says the 3672.9lbs Skyline

    I do actually believe that the R34 would win, but it pisses me off how everybody just jumps to conclusions. I'll search for track times once I get home.

    EDIT: The 3000GT is the one with the better power-to-weight ratio, I gave 0.083 to the Skyline by mistake.
    Quote Originally Posted by kingofthering
    it was unofficial. Plus, the R34's pretty heavy, so it's probably as heavy as the VR4.
    please read posts
    Once fanboyism infects you it impares all your judgement.
    It's like being drunk, you lack common sense and everyone laughs at you.

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    Quote Originally Posted by kigango123
    please read posts
    hmm I'm not that far off.
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by kingofthering
    it was unofficial. Plus, the R34's pretty heavy, so it's probably as heavy as the VR4.
    Sure, the R34 may not be the lightest car on the road, but it is still 200+ pounds lighter than the VR4. On paper, that 200 pounds may not seem like alot, but I'm sure that the driver would be able to feel them. Plus, you've got to remember that the hp ratings for the R34 were still "restricted" to 276 (or 280) by that unwriten Japanese manufactor rule. The RB26DETT really made somewhere between 320hp and 330hp. And then you could get into the arguement on which car has the better AWD system (I am leaning toward the R34). Just thought I might mention that.

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    Quote Originally Posted by 96BattleWagon
    Sure, the R34 may not be the lightest car on the road, but it is still 200+ pounds lighter than the VR4. On paper, that 200 pounds may not seem like alot, but I'm sure that the driver would be able to feel them. Plus, you've got to remember that the hp ratings for the R34 were still "restricted" to 276 (or 280) by that unwriten Japanese manufactor rule. The RB26DETT really made somewhere between 320hp and 330hp. And then you could get into the arguement on which car has the better AWD system (I am leaning toward the R34). Just thought I might mention that.
    Um.... I kinda knew all that, so you just wasted your time.
    I personally think the R34 will win.
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    u.s.a
    Posts
    209
    Quote Originally Posted by 96BattleWagon
    Sure, the R34 may not be the lightest car on the road, but it is still 200+ pounds lighter than the VR4. On paper, that 200 pounds may not seem like alot, but I'm sure that the driver would be able to feel them. Plus, you've got to remember that the hp ratings for the R34 were still "restricted" to 276 (or 280) by that unwriten Japanese manufactor rule. The RB26DETT really made somewhere between 320hp and 330hp. And then you could get into the arguement on which car has the better AWD system (I am leaning toward the R34). Just thought I might mention that.
    r34 is less than 130lbs lighter.that's less than average of a passenger,but yea it has 30 to 40 more WHP that vr4.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    341
    Quote Originally Posted by kingofthering
    I personally think the R34 will win.
    You're not alone. I also think the R34 will not only win, it'll kick some Japanese arse(even though the Skyline's not any better, if you know waht I mean).
    Join V8SuperChat NOW!
    http://vee-eight.super-forum.net

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2021, 05:13 PM
  2. GT4 whole car list!!!!
    By Mustang in forum Gaming
    Replies: 247
    Last Post: 07-07-2010, 08:06 AM
  3. Hide-Out Index
    By Sauc3 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 02:43 AM
  4. Twin Turbo Or Big Single????
    By ludi_konj in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 178
    Last Post: 05-19-2008, 04:10 PM
  5. GT4 wallpapers 50+ Most realistic. 56k friendly!
    By Pimp racer in forum Gaming
    Replies: 548
    Last Post: 03-19-2005, 01:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •