Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 95

Thread: why havnt hot hatches gone rwd ??

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,567
    I think a lot of people would be with me when I said...
    It doesnt matter if it has 500bhp, its still front wheel drive. The handling is still the same, just with more power,
    All about the t-tops

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,329
    the hatchback is a concept that was designed in order to create optimal room within a fairly limited space. Frontwheel drive allows the absence of drive trains and differentials in places where they would abosorb useful room. Therefore RWD and hatchback are a sort of contradiction. That BMW is producing the 1 series is just based on snob appeal, and the four doors are an excuse to make it look like a four seater, while in reality the rear seat space is much less than a Golf. The trunk space is also pathetic. It has the shape of a hatchback, but in reality it is just a spacious 2+2 for which you have to pay the price of a normal 3-series BMW.
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,567
    Well that really wraps up the thread. Suffice to say that RWD should only really be used on "hot hatches".
    Otherwise...just stick with sedans.
    All about the t-tops

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833
    Quote Originally Posted by d-quik
    im gunna be a smartass like the 2nd poster and say theres that rwd ford focus 3rd party package, with the v8 engine bay or something
    Ford has also just built a RWD Focus for the ARC

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    melbourne Australia
    Posts
    922
    Quote Originally Posted by TVR IS KING
    For all Ive heard its more than decent. Its a BMW! Its leading the way on RWD Hot Hatches in my opinion.
    I know it costs a lot, but its a BMW, its made for drivers..it is a sportscar. It has more room than a 350Z...I wonder what gives a better drive?
    That doesn't make sense, your saying its a great car because it has a bmw badge when you should be saying its a great car because its a great car, which it isn't for the amount bmw are charging for it.
    Barnum's Law - You’ll never go broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public

    The dyslexic version of Cyco

    Civil disobedience is still disobedience

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    one thing to add, K, you poined out the increase to over 250hp adn that may be better in a RWD.

    I would concur *IF* they wheelbase were long enough to make a RWD 250+hp car controllable. But of course then the car wouldn't be a "hot hatch" and woudl be more "sedan" sized.

    So the laws of physics kind of limit it
    Shert wheelbase isn't a major issue in FWD as the front wheels will work to PULL the car, but wiht RWD the short distance from the driven to teh steering wheels can make for almnost uncontrollable handling requiring continuous and quick steering input. This can be partially solved with a near solid LSD, but then it won't go round corners
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    129
    Well, off topic but Ford managed to develop the current Transit (far from hot or hatch) to be front or RWD, depending on the application the customer wants, so they should know how to do it. It's definitely possible, a bit more expensive but not so much, as many components can remain the same.

    Btw. any applications with a transversely mounted engine in the front and RWD?

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,329
    Quote Originally Posted by KM2
    Btw. any applications with a transversely mounted engine in the front and RWD?
    that is almost asking like providing the Porsche 911 with Front WD only....
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    129
    If Alfa can equip their cars with a transversely mounted engine and give them a torsen diff AWD with 65% rear bias, why would it be so impossible?

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,329
    Quote Originally Posted by KM2
    If Alfa can equip their cars with a transversely mounted engine and give them a torsen diff AWD with 65% rear bias, why would it be so impossible?
    I thought you meant a transverse front engine and RWD only..... Of course a transverse front engine can be combined with AWD, look at a Fiat Panda for instance...
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by KM2
    If Alfa can equip their cars with a transversely mounted engine and give them a torsen diff AWD with 65% rear bias, why would it be so impossible?
    Nothing is "impossible".
    But the practicalities of cost come into it.
    You have to turn the drive through 90 degrees to a shaft to the rear diff.
    IN FWD the diff does both tasks
    Packaging gets difficult. The market will pay for it in a top fo the range AWD , not necessarily in a RWD
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    it would cost too much.
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  13. #28
    Guest Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Supra
    yeh, the 120d i heard is a mad sports car
    my music teacher owns one ( a 120D), she drove up behind a bus, and of course it stopped, she almost ran into the back of it, but it in reverse and just sat there with the wheels spinning, it was actually quite funny!

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Derby, England
    Posts
    2,192
    Quote Originally Posted by KnifeEdge_2K1
    why are most hot hatches still fwd ??

    ignoring the fact that most hot hatches are based on eco box fwd models wouldnt the switch to rwd improve handling and response dramatically ?? expecially with the trend for more power in these hot hatches why havnt we seen any manufacturers opt for a rwd model to make better use of the grunt ??

    under 200 hp most fwds with an lsd and well setup suspension would be able to put its power down at corner exits earlier then rwd and would be an advantage in lo to mid speed corners but now with the average power output of these hot hatches closing in on 250hp the fwd's inherent downfalls start to kick in
    The reason is cost. The Astra and Vectra VXRs are both very good cars and they provide one hell of a bang for your buck. The BMW 130iM Sport is a rear wheel drive "hot hatch" but look at the price next to an Astra VXR with the same extras added.

    The Vectra's platform can be equipped with All Wheel Drive but that would bring the price up to around BMW levels...and what are you going to buy for £30k, a 3-Series or a Vectra?

    Of course the exception to the rule is still there, in the form of the Subaru Impreza WRX. AWD and at around £20k. It'll eat most hot hatches for breakfast but you do pay for it with an interior that can't match the Astra or Golf.
    "This is hardcore." - Evo's John Barker on the TVR Tuscan S

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,567
    Quote Originally Posted by syko
    That doesn't make sense, your saying its a great car because it has a bmw badge when you should be saying its a great car because its a great car, which it isn't for the amount bmw are charging for it.
    Its not good because its a BMW, its expensive because its a BMW. They make luxury cars, you cant expect a cheap RWD sports hatch from BMW...cheapness isnt really their forte.
    All about the t-tops

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •