|
#61
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is no second car, its the same car.. read.
|
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is something you can actually try yourself. Get in a a non-turbo car (preferably a V6 or V8 truck, for the powerband) and put it in 1st gear. Mash on the gas when your at the RPM where the engine makes its peak torque. Feel that kick in the pants? Now bring the RPMs up there the engine makes it peak power, and mash the gas. You will notice that the car jumps much harder at its peak torque, because TORQUE moves the car. I said preferably a truck because of its torque curve, generally they make a lot of low end torque, and not much high end torque, the results will be more noticable. Yoru car literally follows the torque curve when it accelerates. My car pulls no harder at 3000RPMs than it does at 5000RPMs, because its making the same amount of TORQUE at those RPMS, you dont feel hp. |
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams Last edited by henk4; 03-15-2007 at 12:43 PM. |
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
That doesn't change anything.
If you have two cars (yes, separate cars):
Both cars are otherwise identical and have an infinitely variable transmission so that the engine operates at only the engine speed specified above. Which car can go from 0-60 MPH faster?
__________________
"He who trades liberty for security, deserves neither and will loose both." - Thomas Jefferson |
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams |
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
|
Note the comment: Quote:
__________________
"He who trades liberty for security, deserves neither and will loose both." - Thomas Jefferson |
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Take the SAME car in the SAME gear, with those specs and it will not be accelerating any HARDER (altough traveling at a different speed) because your acceleration follows the torque curve exactly. |
|
#68
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You are incorrectly assuming that the energy needed for a given rate of acceleration is independant of velocity. You are totally wrong there, the faster you go the more energy you need to put into the car just to maintain a constant rate of acceleration. Next you cannot "feel" torque, what you feel is inertial effects from the acceleration of the car which is caused by power. Torque is instantaneous it doesn't have a time or motion componant. When you add the necessary time componant guess what you get... Yup power! Tell you what, if torque is what moves things then you should be able to tell me the theoretical minimum torque needed to accelerate a car that weighs 1000kg from 0m/s to 20m/s in 3 seconds. If you can give me an answer I will bow out. Since power is what decides acceleration i CAN tell you exactly what the minimum power needed will be to do this. Quote:
Quote:
it takes alot more energy to accelerate from 100-120 km/h then it does to accelerate from 0-50km/h... please understand this. I can explain with math and real world examples why and how power does everything. You are using highly subjective and limited experiances to argue your point. Please somebody who believes that torque is what accelerates you please post an acceleration graph on top of a torque curve graph that matches perfectly. BTW: I know that was an impossible request... Also note that torque is changed by gear ratios. Power is not. This alone should convince most people.
__________________
Stop pouring petrol on yourself and it won't be so tempting :D (C)2007-MatraetAlpine "Thank god I am not -What-" Last edited by hightower99; 03-16-2007 at 01:30 AM. |
|
#69
|
||||
|
||||
|
yes, but in that situation the diesel will already have shifted a gear up....(to find more torque again).
__________________
"I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams |
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
|
Which would support my arguement because then the diesel will be making alot more torque then the petrol but the petrol will still be accelerating harder.
__________________
Stop pouring petrol on yourself and it won't be so tempting :D (C)2007-MatraetAlpine "Thank god I am not -What-" |
|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
|
no, the diesel will be accelerating harder.
__________________
"I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams |
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Is a 4-speed transmission better than a 6-speed transmission, no. Why use more gears if it doesn’t change peak acceleration in a specific gear? Because more gears allows the engine to operate near the peak power output across a larger range or road speeds. You are thinking in terms of torque and engine speed, which is fine for just an engine. But when you put the engine in a car with a transmission, and you want the best performance (maximizing acceleration) you have to think in terms of wheel torque and wheel speed.
__________________
"He who trades liberty for security, deserves neither and will loose both." - Thomas Jefferson |
|
#73
|
||||
|
||||
|
What makes you think that? it would be in a higher gear and it would have dropped down in the rev range to where it makes roughly 60hp...
The petrol would be in a lower gear and would be producing 130hp. Both would be traveling at roughly the same speed (if you do the math the petrol is in front by a few km/h). The petrol is accelerating harder period. The diesel is making more torque period. The theory that torque determines your rate of acceleration is therefore proven wrong. Don't believe me? get acceleration graphs that prove me wrong.
__________________
Stop pouring petrol on yourself and it won't be so tempting :D (C)2007-MatraetAlpine "Thank god I am not -What-" |
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sigh.... You proved yourself wrong your own post ! That must be a first
Let me scan these kind of graphs for you after work. I'll also include a lengthy technical explanation. Take it, you are wrong. My classmates and me had a good gniffle about your posts ! I will also give my brain a quick wake-up call and tell you the amount of Nm that is needed for the 1000 kg car... |
|
#75
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
by the way I do have the dyno charts that show the diesel making more torque than the petrol in the situation described.
__________________
Stop pouring petrol on yourself and it won't be so tempting :D (C)2007-MatraetAlpine "Thank god I am not -What-" |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is horsepower? | morepower | Technical forums | 47 | 07-02-2005 11:35 AM |
| HP or Torque? | jcp123 | Car comparison | 76 | 11-29-2004 07:15 PM |
| Torque rant | PerfAdv | Miscellaneous | 5 | 10-09-2004 03:53 AM |
| Low End vs High End torque | KarateBoy | Technical forums | 5 | 02-27-2004 04:29 AM |
| Some questions about cars | 360evolution | Technical forums | 17 | 12-03-2003 08:22 PM |
|
|