Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > General automotive > Technical forums


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-14-2008, 10:43 AM
RacingManiac's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,850
well this is an old thread and new info are hard to come by in terms of specifics....
__________________
University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
www.fsae.utoronto.ca
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:58 AM
Novice
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 58
Isle of Wight, UK
Send a message via MSN to Kozy
As far as I can asscertain from recent journals on the sunject, F1 engines have always had camshafts, an entirely camless engine cannot operate fast enough and is nowhere near reliable enough for the speeds required in F1.

The pnuematic spring system works as a conventional spring would to shut the valve as the camshaft moves around, but does so without the 'float' common with conventional springs at high rpm. The pnuematic system effectively slams the valves open very aggressively, far more so than any metal spring could ever hope to achieve.

Totally camless engines are coming, but I think they are a long way off in terms of being commercially viable. To limiting restrictions at present regarding the favoured soleniod operation are the size and power requirements. Typically a solenoid will be optimised for one thing, travel, speed or force. An engine requires all three of these to be maximised, which is a tall order for anything that is to fit in the space of a conventional camshaft system, especially with the current 12-14v limitation on power.

Fully hydraulic/pnuematic systems I do not know so much about, but I gather they also carry their own limitations, particularly with regards to force and speed.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-27-2008, 02:06 PM
revetec's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 530
Gold Coast, Australia
Basically....Springs have rebound at higher duty cycles, pneumatic equivalents don't (well it is negligible) so more accurate valve operation is possible at very high RPMs.
Kozy...I wouldn't say the valve slams open, rather that it opens and closes as designed, by the camshaft grind, at higher RPMs.

Last edited by revetec; 02-27-2008 at 02:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-27-2008, 02:12 PM
Matra et Alpine's Avatar
le mans recovery mode =ON
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,012
nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
Quote:
Originally Posted by revetec View Post
Kozy...I wouldn't say the valve slams open, rather that it opens and closes as designed, by the camshaft grind.
yeah the open is always driven by the cam profile. THe close however is determined by the strength of the spring and at high revs can leave the profile and will bounce. F1 use penumatics to close and cam to open.
Ducati love Desmodronic whcih pushes in both directions -- and hence it's drawback too
__________________
Voitures-Françaises 'R' Nous ( そして日本語 ) und jetzt der neue Ringmeister
"Thank god I am not -What-"
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-27-2008, 02:16 PM
revetec's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 530
Gold Coast, Australia
Ah yes...but until valve bounce occurs (usually 500rpm before it is audible) the camshaft totally determines closing rates.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:39 AM.

  Contact Us - Ultimatecarpage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
© 1998 - 2008 Ultimatecarpage.com - LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0