Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > Automotive forums > Technical forums


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2009, 05:49 AM
lightweight's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,163
Scotland, UK
UK 'to be green tech leader'

Britain’s car industry could be reborn as a world leader in developing green technology, and could get proper long-term government planning for its future, if the recommendations in a new report from leading industry figures are implemented.

Of course the above claims are way too optimistic, but the UK has the skilled workforce along with the tradition in automotive engineering to make it happen. It takes time and investment, but in 20-30 years they could reap the benefits

Autocar - UK 'to be green tech leader'
__________________
Minimising losses can maximise net gains
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-10-2009, 11:24 AM
NicFromLA's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,102
Los Angeles, CA
Rolls-Royce, Bentley and Mini - German.
Jaguar and Land Rover - Indian.
Aston Martin - Kuwaiti.
Lotus - Malaysian.

So I assume they're leaving this task to Morgan and Bristol?
__________________
"The Metric System is the tool of the Devil! My car gets 40 Rods to the Hogshead and that's the ways I likes it!" -Grandpa Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-10-2009, 11:41 AM
cmcpokey's Avatar
Flat Out
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,355
7 Miles from Laguna-Seca
Send a message via AIM to cmcpokey Send a message via MSN to cmcpokey Send a message via Skype™ to cmcpokey
bristol has been making LPG Blenheims for decades... and the viper powered fighter gets exceptional mpg for that big of an engine, due to its very good aerodynamics. too bad they are both hideous.
__________________
Honor. Courage. Commitment. Etcetera.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-10-2009, 11:44 AM
lightweight's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,163
Scotland, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by NicFromLA View Post
I assume they're leaving this task to Morgan and Bristol?
The article wasn't referring to the auto manufacturers, but to their suppliers. UK has a vast infrastructure of car-related businesses that have the know-how to develop parts that the manufacturers don't.

Most mass manufacturers these days construct the engine block and chassis and buy the rest of the parts from suppliers.

Some go to the extent of assigning the manufacturing to other factories (Porsche for Boxster, although this is not a mass manufacturer)
__________________
Minimising losses can maximise net gains
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-2009, 11:58 AM
Ferrer's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,048
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Quote:
Originally Posted by NicFromLA View Post
Rolls-Royce, Bentley and Mini - German.
Jaguar and Land Rover - Indian.
Aston Martin - Kuwaiti.
Lotus - Malaysian.

So I assume they're leaving this task to Morgan and Bristol?
The notion of a british car industry is indeed laughable.

Maybe the plan is to not make any cars at all so they don't pollute or something.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmcpokey View Post
bristol has been making LPG Blenheims for decades... and the viper powered fighter gets exceptional mpg for that big of an engine, due to its very good aerodynamics. too bad they are both hideous.
I love the Blenheim, it's so left field. Unfortunately they only make it in RHD.
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-10-2009, 12:05 PM
lightweight's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,163
Scotland, UK
The key word here is "developing" green technology, not "manufacturing".

The manufacturing will always be done on cheap labour countries. But the development of the technology requires automotive ingenuity. UK has proven many times that they have the ability to develop new automotive technologies.
__________________
Minimising losses can maximise net gains
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-10-2009, 12:11 PM
lightweight's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,163
Scotland, UK
Some more relevant data


"Obama kills the hydrogen car by slashing research funding"

Obama kills the hydrogen car by slashing research funding - MotorAuthority - Car news, reviews, spy shots
__________________
Minimising losses can maximise net gains
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-10-2009, 02:09 PM
NicFromLA's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,102
Los Angeles, CA
The fact is what makes today's cars so bad for the planet is their size and weight, the British figured out a solution to this forty years ago: YouTube - Jeremy Clarkson - Smallest Car
__________________
"The Metric System is the tool of the Devil! My car gets 40 Rods to the Hogshead and that's the ways I likes it!" -Grandpa Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-10-2009, 02:17 PM
f6fhellcat13's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,306
Troy, Njörk (but still not from Liberia)
Send a message via AIM to f6fhellcat13 Send a message via MSN to f6fhellcat13
Quote:
Originally Posted by NicFromLA View Post
The fact is what makes today's cars so bad for the planet is their size and weight, the British figured out a solution to this forty years ago: YouTube - Jeremy Clarkson - Smallest Car
That is utterly impractical. It can only hold one person.

Everybody should drive around in Type 14 Lotus Elites. A Cd of .28, 505kgs, and a massive two-person payload capability.
It got a mere 35mpg with its '60s engine technology, but imagine what it could get today.
And best of all; it was built when Lotus was a British company!
__________________
"I have a California and since it's our stupid cashcow for people who don't understand cars it must be as good as the Cayenne off road..."
-Luca di Montezemelo on his off track excursion (via Ferrer)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-10-2009, 02:19 PM
Ferrer's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,048
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Quote:
Originally Posted by NicFromLA View Post
The fact is what makes today's cars so bad for the planet is their size and weight, the British figured out a solution to this forty years ago: YouTube - Jeremy Clarkson - Smallest Car
Quote:
Originally Posted by f6fhellcat13 View Post
That is utterly impractical. It can only hold one person.

Everybody should drive around in Type 14 Lotus Elites. A Cd of .28, 505kgs, and a massive two-person payload capability.
It got a mere 35mpg with its '60s engine technology, but imagine what it could get today.
And best of all; it was built when Lotus was a British company!
I like the second idea best.

In fact it's utterly brilliant.
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-10-2009, 02:39 PM
lightweight's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,163
Scotland, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by f6fhellcat13 View Post
Everybody should drive around in Type 14 Lotus Elites. A Cd of .28, 505kgs, and a massive two-person payload capability.
It got a mere 35mpg with its '60s engine technology, but imagine what it could get today.
I would certainly like one of these in my garage, but I wouldn't like to be involved in a crash with one of these. First of all because it would mean ruining a historic car and second because it would kill its passenger most likely...

The backbone chassis meant bad sideways impact protection with 60's standards, let alone today...
__________________
Minimising losses can maximise net gains
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-10-2009, 02:45 PM
f6fhellcat13's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,306
Troy, Njörk (but still not from Liberia)
Send a message via AIM to f6fhellcat13 Send a message via MSN to f6fhellcat13
Quote:
Originally Posted by lightweight View Post
I would certainly like one of these in my garage, but I wouldn't like to be involved in a crash with one of these. First of all because it would mean ruining a historic car and second because it would kill its passenger most likely...

The backbone chassis meant bad sideways impact protection with 60's standards, let alone today...
Didn't they fix that with the Elan?
(Another car everybody should drive)

Alternatively, (and a lot more boring) the Tata Nano. 580kg, slap on some emission equipment (which will probably be required), and you're at a cool 600kg. You can then laugh at Jenson, Lewis, Kimi, and Co.
India was once under British control, so that counts, right?
__________________
"I have a California and since it's our stupid cashcow for people who don't understand cars it must be as good as the Cayenne off road..."
-Luca di Montezemelo on his off track excursion (via Ferrer)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-10-2009, 02:52 PM
Ferrer's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,048
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
I'm sure the Elite could be made safe with modern technology but retaining all of its advantages.

(Elan +2, perfect family car?)
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-10-2009, 03:00 PM
lightweight's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,163
Scotland, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
I'm sure the Elite could be made safe with modern technology but retaining all of its advantages.

(Elan +2, perfect family car?)
It could be made safe, but I doubt that it could retain its 500 kg weight, or its price. The Elise MkI had a claimed weight of 725 kg (Actually was more with fluids etc). The Elise MkII these days struggles to remain below 800 kg.

Given that the main advantage of the Elite was its weight, I doubt that it could be produced with todays legislation and still be as exciting as the 60s model.

Even Caterhams are heavier than the Elite
__________________
Minimising losses can maximise net gains
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-10-2009, 03:12 PM
Ferrer's Avatar
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,048
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Quote:
Originally Posted by lightweight View Post
It could be made safe, but I doubt that it could retain its 500 kg weight, or its price. The Elise MkI had a claimed weight of 725 kg (Actually was more with fluids etc). The Elise MkII these days struggles to remain below 800 kg.

Given that the main advantage of the Elite was its weight, I doubt that it could be produced with todays legislation and still be as exciting as the 60s model.

Even Caterhams are heavier than the Elite
How is that?

I mean, why are we going backwards?
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Porsche 997 911 Carrera 4 Colin17 Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 33 07-19-2008 03:58 AM
UK vs US vs OZ fpv_gtho Car comparison 2 07-12-2004 04:55 AM
British International Motor Show Cotterik Miscellaneous 11 06-02-2004 02:12 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 AM.

  Contact Us - Ultimatecarpage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
© 1998 - 2009 Ultimatecarpage.com - Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1