Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > Automotive forums > Technical forums


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 11-24-2004, 02:48 PM
KnifeEdge_2K1's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,266
it wont fit
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-24-2004, 03:28 PM
Egg Nog's Avatar
The Voice of Reason
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,774
Vancouver, Canada
Send a message via MSN to Egg Nog
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnifeEdge_2K1
it wont fit
I don't think the 998 would use the Cayenne V8. Nobody knows anything about the 998 yet, probably not even Porsche.

However: Having not seen the car yet, why would you be so quick to say "it wouldn't fit"? 914s and even early 911s fit Chevy V8s in them, so I don't see how a much larger (and heavier ) new 911 would have any problems with the Cayenne's V8. Especially if they engineered it to fit, which they would, if they were going to...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-24-2004, 05:27 PM
PerfAdv's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,558
Location: California
It started innocently enough using VW parts. The 356-1 Roadster from the late 40s, the first Porsche(widely recoqnized) used a Beetle drivetrain. Only it was flipped, meaning the engine sat infront on the rear axle. The 356-1 was midengined 2 seater. The 356-2 of the 50s put the engine behind as in the Beetle. It has stayed back there eversince.

The mid-engine design has many high performance advantages. It is overall superior to the rear-engine setup. However, some of the advantages of having a rear weight bias are amplified with having the engine in the rear. Under acceleration from a standstill, weight is on top of the drive wheels. This gives the 911s there ability to sprint off the line. Under heavy braking, weight transfers to the front, making the rear unsettled. Most pronounced in FWD cars which already carry >60% of weight on the fronts. In RWDs with 50/50 distribution this transfer affects less under braking and this carrys on even more so for mid-engined setups. With the most rear weight bias, the 911 is king of late braking.

Everything has a cost and the rear weight bias has its downside, mostly where a more balanced, 50/50 distribution is advantageous. Just as a FWD naturally understeers a 911 will oversteer. Much of the dangerous snap oversteer of older 911s has been controlled with better suspension setups, moving weight forward, and using huge rubber in the back.

I hope Porsche never completely rids the 911 of its handling demons. The best 911 for 911 handling quirks is the current GT3, IMO.
__________________
"Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-24-2004, 10:35 PM
Radoman's Avatar
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 472
Location: Home? What home?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmntmail_ppn
Why the 911 never use V engine??? what's the advantages of boxer engine, beside the low centre-of-gravity like RazaBlade said??
As explained earlier, Flat 6's are much better balanced than V's. also, they sound better. and Amen, PerfAdv.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Porsche 997 911 Carrera Matt Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 22 07-19-2008 03:59 AM
Porsche 997 911 Carrera S Matt Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 33 08-18-2006 08:32 AM
Really useful performance listings... Egg Nog Technical forums 54 02-05-2006 09:07 PM
Porsche Tractors lfb666 Multimedia 3 10-12-2004 12:43 PM
Porsche 993 Twin Turbo McLareN Multimedia 9 10-01-2004 06:38 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:36 PM.

  Contact Us - Ultimatecarpage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
© 1998 - 2008 Ultimatecarpage.com - LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0