|
|
#46
10-16-2009, 12:24 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
'67 Mustang, C4 automatic:
2,46 1st 1,46 2nd 1,00 3rd Rear axle ratio: 3,00:1 No torque converter lockup or, obviously, overdrive. Why did overdrive fall out of fashion from the 50's to the 80's, anyway?
__________________
Mmmm...carburetors. '67 Mustang Convertible - Daily Driver '09 Harley XL1200n Nightster - 1/4's in the 12's and 45mpg (5,25l/100km for those lucky enough to be using the metric system) Last edited by jcp123; 10-16-2009 at 01:49 AM.. 
|
|
#47
10-16-2009, 02:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Cars: Something which the Americans have made quite a few of which are designed and built and operate properly. '66 Plymouth Fury VIP, '69 Fleetwood, '76 Limo, '95 Town Car
|
|
#48
10-24-2009, 10:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes it would have. OD makes your gearing so much more vesatile - suddenly 3.73's and shorter in the rear end don't look so steep at all. I'm going to guess it came down to cost?
__________________
Mmmm...carburetors. '67 Mustang Convertible - Daily Driver '09 Harley XL1200n Nightster - 1/4's in the 12's and 45mpg (5,25l/100km for those lucky enough to be using the metric system)
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Land Rover e-Terrain Concept | Matt | Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out | 2 | 02-28-2006 08:25 AM |
Linear Mode
