The Misho Theory

[Misho]

Originally Posted by motorsportnerd

Perhaps a minimum number of posts will be needed before a Misho rating can be applied.

excellent observation !! +1

but if you take a closer look at the very first post in this thread, you will see that in the range factors table, i specified that the Misho rating only starts after 200 posts !
this means that u didnt fully concentrate when reading the post ! -1
coz if u think of it, u need sometime to be able to properly and accurately judge a person. even in real life, u dont just judge someone based on first impressions (although they are important). that is why i think that the Misho is to be applied after 200 posts, at which the user can be fairy judged.

[Misho]

Originally Posted by bballmikey105

it is much more explanatory the way it is.
.

no it isnt !!!!!!!! have u even read my post ?!!!

Originally Posted by bballmikey105

There doesn't need to be a Misho ratio because as you can see I have pretty much no rep points
.

but u also dont have many posts! so you didnt write much to get rep points for. that is exactly why there needs to be a Misho ratio !! man, please read the theory again !!

Originally Posted by bballmikey105

If it said under the user name number of posts, rep pts, and also misho ratio, I guess it might work

that is exactly what i want. it must say ur Misho ratio under the rep points. otherwise what good would the theory be ?!

[Misho]

Originally Posted by Egg Nog

Here's one counter-Misho theory thing that I've noticed....

good thing ur thinking of the theory at least !!

Originally Posted by Egg Nog

I feel less compelled to give rep points to someone like M&A, Falcon, or crisis because I'd rather give points to good new members and contributors on the verge of 20 points. I feel that a new member who posts something of M&A quality should get loads of points, and that folks at higher up on the list shouln't get nearly as many.

i have to disagree with you on that. why would u do something like that ??
you should rate a post (either + or -) based entirely on its content. without even looking at who posted it.

Originally Posted by Egg Nog

Thus, an accurate Misho scale graph wouldn't really show a direct relationship.

please keep in mind that the Misho theory is not error-free. nor is supposed to eliminate/replace the currently used reputation system. it is just a better, more representative form of reflecting the quality of the posts made.
it is designed to improve the current system and work with it.

[Misho]

Originally Posted by Spastik_Roach

How new they are is on the joining date located above the rep rating, and I guess is also shown by the posting count.

posting count is much more relevant than joining date. so basically we need something to relate the posting count with the rep rating, hence the Misho Theory !!

[Misho]

Originally Posted by IBrake4Rainbows

The misho theory does sound like a good idea,
.

thanks. it is a truly magnificent idea if u ask me !!!

Originally Posted by IBrake4Rainbows

i doubt if i'd use the misho ratio as well.

the Misho ratio is based on the rep count. they sort of complete eachother. so if u dont rely on the rep count, then the misho ratio is also useless for you.

Originally Posted by IBrake4Rainbows

Just because they have low rep doesn't necessarily mean there a bad poster, it could mean someone has taken offence to something they have said.

if they offended someone, that makes them a bad poster!! and to prevent the issue of stupid, ignorant users giving away negative repuations, the system only allows users with 20+ rep count to make a mathematically effective rating.

[360GTC]

You seem really psyched on your misho ratio.....which is great, and i think its a great theory but your right it isnt errorr proof. Like ibrake4rainbows said you can have a low rep cuz some took offense, that doesnt mean you posted something bad, it means you posted your oppinion and someone didnt like it. Other than that i think the misho ration should be put in effect right now and below everyones avatar it should say your ratio.

Great idea!

[Spastik_Roach]

Misho btw, awesome new sig! Very funny, I think I might just add it to the Sig Awards.

[Misho]

Originally Posted by Spastik_Roach

Misho btw, awesome new sig! Very funny, I think I might just add it to the Sig Awards.

be my guest !! although i think it will make all the other signatures obsolete !!

[crisis]

Originally Posted by Misho

thanks. it is a truly magnificent idea if u ask me !!!



the Misho ratio is based on the rep count. they sort of complete eachother. so if u dont rely on the rep count, then the misho ratio is also useless for you.



if they offended someone, that makes them a bad poster!! and to prevent the issue of stupid, ignorant users giving away negative repuations, the system only allows users with 20+ rep count to make a mathematically effective rating.

Perhasp Misho, my man, you would have more success in promoting your theory if your werent so humble.

[Misho]

welcome back crisis !!


if only anyone here can tell me why most of you guys hate this theory so much, i might try and solve that issue ! why do u hate the Misho ratio ??
its just a number under each user's rep count !!

[Misho]

and to prove how humble i can be , i am going right now to the UCP legacy thread to post my own legacy.
can u guess what is it ?!!

[Matra et Alpine]

Anyway Misho, to bring it over from the other thread.

Like all engineer's you have only worked in the 3 dimensions of your training.
You've forgotten the need to add time to the rating system.
You discounted the joiing date too quickly as engineer's are seldom trained to think in more than 3 deimensions
500 posts over a year equal to 500 posts in a week ?
CLEARLY NOT.

So, put your text books aside and learn common sense

nothing is fair. LIFE isn't fair.

PLEASE note the smileys !!!!!

And one over-riding lesson from the world of motorsport.
The great Colin Chapman always designed things to be JUST enough.
Often other teamsn, engineers and academics would scorn his ideas and solutions.
I follow his model

[Misho]

i left out many factors (such as time) to pass the KISS test !!
didnt want to make it too complicated !!

OWNED !!

[Matra et Alpine]

Originally Posted by Misho

i left out many factors (such as time) to pass the KISS test !!
didnt want to make it too complicated !!

OWNED !!

But to include quantity and NOT include time negates the value.
You can make 500 panels in a press in either a day or an hour.
The ones done in an hour will be inferior

Suggest you look into the theory and practicalities of TQC before continuing.
( Now I will really worry about our education system if that stumps you as much as KISS does )

Adding quantity and not time is trying to be half-pregnant. It doesn't work

[Misho]

Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine

You can make 500 panels in a press in either a day or an hour.
The ones done in an hour will be inferior

if they are inferior then you should get -ve ratings for them and ur Misho ratio will detoriate.
so again the Misho ratio represents the impact of ur posts effectively !


BTW, does anyone here give -ve ratings ?? other than giving them to obvious childish people that only post a couple of posts and never show up again ?