View Full Version : 3000GT vs Dodge Stealth RT Turbo
lfb666
01-28-2004, 02:10 PM
1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT
General
Make: Mitsubishi
Year: 1991
Engine Location: Front
Drive Type: Front Wheel
Weight: 3700 lbs | 1678.3 kg.
Cylinders: 6
Engine Configuration: V
Aspiration/Induction: Twin-turbocharged
Displacement: 3 L | 183.1 cu in. | 2999.4 cc.
Valves: NA
Valvetrain: NA
Horsepower: 235.5 Kw / 320 HP @ 6000 RPM
Torque: 427.1 Nm / 315 Ft-lbs @ 2500 RPM
Gears: 5
Transmission Type: manual
0-60 mph: 5.4 sec
1/4 Mile: NA
Top Speed: 160 mph | 257.4 km/h
1991 Dodge Stealth RT Turbo
General
Make: Dodge
Year: 1991
Engine Location: Front
Drive Type: AWD
Weight: 3792 lbs | 1720.1 kg.
Cylinders: 6
Engine Configuration: V
Aspiration/Induction: Normal
Displacement: 2972 cc | 181.4 cu in. | 3.0 L.
Valves: 24
Valvetrain: DOHC
Horsepower: 217.9 Kw / 296 BHP @ 5500 RPM
Torque: 416.3 Nm / 307 Ft-lbs @ 2500 RPM
Gears: 5
Transmission Type: manual
0-60 mph: 5.4 sec
1/4 Mile: 14.2
Top Speed: 168 mph | 270.3 km/h
Egg Nog
01-28-2004, 05:59 PM
Just thought I'd point out that there's no FWD 3000gt with 320hp. You must be thinking of the VR/4, which is AWD.
I'm a bigger fan of the stealth. It's basically the same, looks a lot better in my eyes, and when I've checked around for one, seems to be a lot cheaper to buy.
Smokescreen
01-28-2004, 08:27 PM
You're gonna get the same performance out of each car, but I would pick the Dodge because it looks cleaner, I'm not a fan of the 3000's side vents.
Egg Nog
01-28-2004, 08:57 PM
I think I might be a rarity, but I really like the looks of the Stealth's spoiler. I think it's totally original and classy.
cptgunther
01-29-2004, 08:30 AM
I thought there were pretty much the same car, manufactured by Diamond Star Motors (the Chrysler-Mitsubishi Collaboration company), just like the Mitsu Eclipse, Plymouth Laser, and Eagle Talon were the same car, except for trim levels and minor body/badging changes.
I like more the Mitsubishi :)
Egg Nog
01-30-2004, 07:10 PM
I like more the Mitsubishi :)
Why? They are the same car, but the Dodge is easily found for less money.
Reasons, please.
Romeo
02-17-2004, 09:07 AM
hey,
do you know anything about a dodge stealth engine.
Contact at
[email protected]
Egg Nog
02-17-2004, 05:20 PM
hey,
do you know anything about a dodge stealth engine.
Contact at
[email protected]
You over-filled the oil reserve. After a while, it'll burn off some of the excess, and your oil pressure will drop.
sandwich
02-17-2004, 08:10 PM
is it low oil pressure or high?
You may want to drain some out...if it's low...that could be very bad, hopefully it's a bad filter or leaky gasket....if it's not, you've got some serious engine problems like a toasted block or some burnt bearings...
I find this comparison to be fairly retarded...they are almost identical...aside from headlights and roof coloration....but i'll stick with the mitsu because the dodge is just rebadged....not need to be shady dodge, build your own car :mad:
Niko_Fx
02-19-2004, 03:04 PM
I like the mitsubishi better, it looks nicer to me, the stealth looks like a copy, besides the vr4 is all wheel drive 320 hp and probably faster than the stealth. I also like the taillights on the 3000 better
Squire
02-27-2004, 06:31 PM
Hey...my first post.
If I recall correctly, the 3000 GT had a few more bells and whistles. Both had AWD and a ~300 bhp engine. And I believe the top-end models also both had 4-wheel steering. However, one of them (the Mitsubishi, I think) had active aerodynamics and active exhaust. Or was it the Stealth? :confused: Anyway, one of those two options was unavailable on one of those cars.
Squire
Niko_Fx
02-27-2004, 06:38 PM
Hey...my first post.
If I recall correctly, the 3000 GT had a few more bells and whistles. Both had AWD and a ~300 bhp engine. And I believe the top-end models also both had 4-wheel steering. However, one of them (the Mitsubishi, I think) had active aerodynamics and active exhaust. Or was it the Stealth? :confused: Anyway, one of those two options was unavailable on one of those cars.
Squire
It was the Mitsubishi, it has the ActiveAereo, The exhaust and also the option of choosing something like "Racing or Normal" Shock absorbers.
Spastik_Roach
02-27-2004, 09:16 PM
3000GT (or GTO as it is called in New Zealand) for me. The Dodge looks too American and I really don't like the rims on that Dodge...
Batmobile_Turbo
02-27-2004, 11:11 PM
i think i like the mitsu better,i just like the looks more. as for performance and configuration, i like the rear wheel drive of the Dodge. i think i would buy the stealth instead of the 3000GT because it' cheaper. I also like the 3000GT more because it is Mitsubishis only true sports cars, whereas the Viper is Dodges sports car.
gtracer893
03-12-2004, 05:57 PM
i own a 94 3000gt, i like both the 3000gt and the stealth. i just bought a body kit for my gt from procarparts. their price is so low!!! i also bought a set of glow gauges. go to their site and check it out. www.procarparts.com
alan92rttt
03-26-2004, 03:29 PM
the specs from the 1st post and the pics don't match up.
the images are both 1994+ cars.
The stealth picture is either a base or the RT non turbo. I think its a 1996.
I can't tell from the pics if that 3000 is a turbo or not.
VR4(the TT 3000gt) vs the RT/TT
year for year the engines and transmissions are the same
1991-1993 300hp 5spd all wheel drive.
1994 + 320hp 6spd all wheel drive
IN 19-93 the only functionl differance is the active aero on the 3000gt.
in 95-96 the stealth omitted the all wheel steering and the eletronic suspension and a few other toys.
Why? They are the same car, but the Dodge is easily found for less money.
Reasons, please.
but the 3000gt looks better