The Mazdaspeed we've all been waiting for!!!!!!!!

[Gtek-i]

Specifications
Engine
Type: Turbocharged Inline-4
Displacement cu in (cc): 138 (2260)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 263(196) / 5500
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 280(380) / 3000
Redline at RPM: 6700
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/disc
Tires F-R: 215/45 R18
Driveline: Front Wheel Drive
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 175.1 × 68.8 × 57.1
Weight lb (kg): n.a.
Performance
Acceleration 0-60 mph s: < 6.0
Top Speed mph (km/h): 155 (250) - electronically limited
Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): n.a.


Base Price: 2007 Mazda Mazdaspeed3 - n.a. (last update: 9/4/2006)

[Gtek-i]

Mazdaspeed3 is Kicking Asphalt and Taking Names

The 2007 Mazdaspeed3 is one of the fastest and quickest front-wheel drive cars in the world. With a zero-to-60 time under six-seconds and an electronically limited top-speed of 155 mph, Mazdaspeed3 is the class of the sport-compact “pocket-rocket” crowd.

The Mazdaspeed3 features a compact, lightweight five-door body paired with a 263-horsepower 2.3-liter DISI (Direct Injection Spark Ignition) Turbo engine, giving it a best-in-class power-to-weight ratio and making it one of the highest performing front-wheel drive cars in the world.

Power and Handling

Under the hood of the Mazdaspeed3 is a version of the turbocharged and intercooled 2.3-liter four-cylinder direct-injection gasoline engine that powers the highly regarded Mazdaspeed6 sport sedan and the CX-7 crossover SUV. Engineered to deliver high performance at all speeds, along with low exhaust emissions and excellent fuel economy, Mazda’s MZR 2.3 DISI turbocharged engine produces 263 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 280 lb-ft torque at 3,000 rpm in the Mazdaspeed3.

Key engine components include aluminum block and head construction with forged steel internal components — crankshaft and connecting rods — for long-lasting durability, while balance shafts help eliminate noise and vibration. A large air-to-air intercooler and direct fuel injection cool temperature inside the cylinder.

Sophisticated Torque Management

To increase drivability and minimize torque steer and wheel spin in what is a very powerful front-wheel drive car, a sophisticated torque-management system combines with equal-length hardened driveshafts and a cone-type Super LSD limited slip differential.

High Body Rigidity and Specially Tuned Chasis

Like the 2007 Mazda 3, the new Mazdaspeed3 features a body with increased rigidity. The Mazdaspeed version is based on the Mazda 3 5-Door hatchback, with local reinforcements added to produce a body sufficiently stiff to stand up to the demands of 263 horsepower. Suspension and brakes have also been specially tuned.

Body rigidity has been increased through several measures, including a reinforced front cowl that is joined directly to the top section of the front damper mount, assuring the same rigidity as a car fitted with a strut tower bar (which would not have been possible because of the placement of the intercooler above the engine). This prevents deformation of the front suspension towers under cornering load and maintains correct suspension geometry.

Mazdaspeed Design DNA

Mazdaspeed3 's styling pursues a look of strength and solidity in a design that conveys the car's dynamic performance. Its form is characterized by boldly flared front fenders and effective use of strong edges on the hood. These combine with the functional forms of the bumpers, spoilers and other parts developed for aerodynamic performance. Overall, Mazdaspeed3's design is sporty and strong, befitting a high-performance model, without exaggerated styling cues.

Interior Design

Mazdaspeed 3 ’s cockpit is a harmonious synthesis of functional sportiness and stylish comfort. A high-quality black finish sets the tone of the interior, accented by red stitching on the seats, steering wheel, and the shift boot to create a sporty yet refined look. The instrument panel includes a matte black decorative insert panel finished with a hairline treatment to underscore the vehicle’s personality. A leather-wrapped shift knob, aluminum pedals and stainless steel scuff plates further contribute to the sporty, high quality feel that distinguishes Mazdaspeed models, while front sport seats with the Mazdaspeed logo – developed specifically for the Mazdaspeed3 – on the seatbacks provide firm support and comfort.

[carsnut]

doesn't sound too bad. adds up to all the hot hatches out there

[johnnyperl]

280lb-ft through FWD when Mazda has an excelent AWD powertrain?! Could have been a great car. Its slower to 60 than a WRX which has less power.

[mmm_aapls]

280lb-ft through FWD when Mazda has an excelent AWD powertrain?! Could have been a great car. Its slower to 60 than a WRX which has less power.

And it is slower around a track. they said is was going to kick the WRX, but in reality it is just not as fast.

[Spastik_Roach]

Wheels don't look aggressive enough. Somewhat disappointing considering how good it could've been.

[Machalel]

It's slower due to wheelspin, given a rolling start it's faster.

They didn't use their AWD platform, as that would add about 200kg of weight (not to mention $$$ on the price), and then you have exactly the same thing as the Mazda 6 MPS, except in a smaller-hatch body.

The car is supposed to be a hot-hatch, not a turbo AWD circuit car like the WRX or Evo. It is more aimed towards the Golf GTi, Clio Sport/Megane Turbo, Ford XR5, etc.


It's not dissapointing once you drive it... trust me!

[Blue Supra]

in bang for your buck though. its a pretty good buy for what you get.

BTW: theyre for sale in Aus now and theyre the Mazda 3 MPS.

[ScionDriver]

I like it!

[mattmacklind]

I like it too.

[Gtek-i]

It's slower due to wheelspin, given a rolling start it's faster.

They didn't use their AWD platform, as that would add about 200kg of weight (not to mention $$$ on the price), and then you have exactly the same thing as the Mazda 6 MPS, except in a smaller-hatch body.

The car is supposed to be a hot-hatch, not a turbo AWD circuit car like the WRX or Evo. It is more aimed towards the Golf GTi, Clio Sport/Megane Turbo, Ford XR5, etc. you really just read my mind:p

[johnnyperl]

It's slower due to wheelspin, given a rolling start it's faster.
So which series will this be racing in that its going to have a rolling start?

:rolleyes:

[PerfAdv]

Very versatile car and finally fast enough.

[Machalel]

So which series will this be racing in that its going to have a rolling start?



errr... the "driving on the road and want to overtake etc" series?

:rolleyes:

[Dino Scuderia]

I stopped by the Mazda dealer yesterday...they had two 2007 regular 3's on the lot, the new rims on those look better than the Mazdaspeeds do.

Also they've toned down the seat inserts which are either red or blue depending on what color car you choose, this is a good move...before those inserts were a bit obnoxious.

They didn't have any '07 brochures yet and the Mazda web site isn't updated yet so I don't know what the new colors are.

I am seriously considering a 3 but I don't need the Mazdaspeed, the 3 is a great car for $19,000 to 23,000 depending on the trim level. The M'speed will of course be more than that.

As an aside...they had 5 M'speed 6's on the lot...I'm wondering if they aren't selling very well.

[fpv_gtho]

The Mazdaspeed we've all been waiting for.....was introduced to us by Matt over 6 months ago....

http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=23177&highlight=Mazdaspeed3

Start using the search function Gtek-i

[NSXType-R]

No wonder everything looked so familiar... :D

[Schumi]

dang it...since they are doing this I want a Volvo S40 R to be made

[The_Canuck]

The Mazdaspeed we've all been waiting for.....was introduced to us by Matt over 6 months ago....

http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=23177&highlight=Mazdaspeed3

Start using the search function Gtek-i
Beat me to it :rolleyes:

[NuclearCrap]

I've lost count of how many times he was told to use the search function.

[coolieman1220]

zoom zoom zoom

[2ndclasscitizen]

dang it...since they are doing this I want a Volvo S40 R to be made
They sell a model with AWD and the Focus ST 2.5 Turbo engine. That not good enough?

[Vindesh17]

I don't know about you but the Mazdaspeed I've been waiting for was out for a while. It's called the Mazdaspeed 6.

[Quiggs]

I don't know about you but the Mazdaspeed I've been waiting for was out for a while. It's called the Mazdaspeed 6.
This one is good enough for me...

http://www.aaa-calif.com/westways/0504/pg_58b.jpg

[Zytek_Fan]

I've lost count of how many times he was told to use the search function.
I'll look

edit: I'm not even going to bother counting all those responses regarding "gtek-i and search"

[freelykinked]

took delivery of my mazda 3 mps (mazdaspeed 3) last month, and there is very few cars on the road quicker, whether taking off from the lights or rolling, only wrx thats quicker in a straight line is the new sti or evo club spec 9, and thats from experience;)

[fpv_gtho]

Congratulations on your purchase, but im pretty sure stock for stock, even the standard WRX's are faster than the 3 MPS. IIRC, the 0-100km/h times are about 6.2 vs high 5's.

[clutch-monkey]

WRX's are tricky to launch though - and isn't it the sti that's under 6s to 100km/h, not the wrx? :confused:

[freelykinked]

the quoted 0-100 times might be quicker but in the real world i've found the wrx is always first away from the line but its goodnight from there, mps just hauls them in and leaves them for dead, same thing with a mates vz commodore ss

[freelykinked]

and yeah it is the sti thats quicker, standard wrx slightly slower 6.2 or 6.5 secs/100km/h i think

[mehrshadvr4]

i wasn't waiting .lol:D

[adrenaline]

Thanks for sharing.




:)

[fpv_gtho]

and yeah it is the sti thats quicker, standard wrx slightly slower 6.2 or 6.5 secs/100km/h i think

Im pretty sure both break 6s, theres maybe only a 0.3-4s difference across the WRX, WRP10 and STi.

But yes they do jump in front but then get reeled in. Thats one fairly common observation when theyre compared against Falcons and Commodores.

[P4g4nite]

Congrats freelykinked, it's nice to start seeing some different cars about.
Are you going to mess about (modify) with it at all?

[freelykinked]

not yet, would like to, but cant afford at the moment. if i do will almost certainly be a 3in turbo back exhaust first, to get a nicer note and to get it on boost even earlier

[Toyota4Life]

i am not a mazda fan but i have to give it to them good job on this the best so far!!:D

[clutch-monkey]

i am not a mazda fan but i have to give it to them good job on this the best so far!!:D
RX-7 SP? :p

[Prius]

not too shabby. I know that it won't be all for in America (If they are even going to sell it here) since we have a very meager market for hatchbacks. here, if you want a car, it has a trunk. If you want a car with a hatch, you get a SUV or Minivan.

But it looks liek it will hold its own in Europe, and will be able to keep up with the likes of teh Focus RS, GOlf GTi and Skoda. (Am I right, that one car by Seat, or am I thining of something else?)

[092326001]

i read about a long time ago
heard the thing has tremendously awful torque steer

[QBridge]

I saw this car on the cover of a magazine comparing it to the WRX which is stupid because the WRX is not FWD. It's FWD so I'll take the WRX.

[Dino Scuderia]

I saw this car on the cover of a magazine comparing it to the WRX which is stupid because the WRX is not FWD. It's FWD so I'll take the WRX.

I wasn't a stupid comparison because Car and Driver was only comparing 0-60 times, not the complete performance range.

[Dino Scuderia]

not too shabby. I know that it won't be all for in America (If they are even going to sell it here) since we have a very meager market for hatchbacks. here, if you want a car, it has a trunk. If you want a car with a hatch, you get a SUV or Minivan.

But it looks liek it will hold its own in Europe, and will be able to keep up with the likes of teh Focus RS, GOlf GTi and Skoda. (Am I right, that one car by Seat, or am I thining of something else?)

It is for sale in the US now.

[QBridge]

I wasn't a stupid comparison because Car and Driver was only comparing 0-60 times, not the complete performance range.
But they did do that because if they only compared 0-60 they wouldnt have written all those pages about the cars. Might of been a dif magazine.

I'll always take AWD over FWD any day of the week so no review can tell the Mazda is better and I'll always take RWD over anything.

[Dino Scuderia]

But they did do that because if they only compared 0-60 they wouldnt have written all those pages about the cars. Might of been a dif magazine.

I'll always take AWD over FWD any day of the week so no review can tell the Mazda is better and I'll always take RWD over anything.

You only mentioned the cover, you never mentioned 'all those pages'...so which is it, a comment on a cover, or pages and pages of comparisons to a WRX?

[Tomodachi]

Actually in the recent magazine of MotorTrend the only catagory the WRX got over the MSP3 was 1\4 mile by a milisecond. The MotorTrend choice between these two was the MPS3. They said once they hit 100 the MSP3 just took off. It seems like it was a close comparo. They mentioned that regardless of the FWD lay out that the MSP3 smoked the WRX in every coner of the track. With a 0.69g avg in the MT figure eight toping over WRX's .80g's MotorTrend said that the MSP3 just had a more agressive suspension over WRX's mild set. They tested at the AMCI autocross's track. MSP3 1:22.10sec
vs WRX's 1:23.03sec's. So like i said the MSP3 spanked the WRX in almost all of the test catagory's they have. Acceleration being the only one the MSP3 couldent win. Keep in mind they had to launch the MSP3 at 1000rpms compared to the 5000rpm clutch drop the WRX could perform. All in all i will have to hand it to the FWD lil beast besting the WRX's awd.

[NSXType-R]

The only problem is that the WRX is an entry model. It has crappy all seasons, a soft suspension and basically it's not performance oriented. Motortrend has a bad comparison in my opinion. You bring in the STI for about 8,000 more and you'll smoke the Mazdaspeed 3 and 6 any time.

[Tomodachi]

Well of course it will! They used the WRX because its the best bang for your buck under 25k. What sense would it make to bring in a 34k car to spank a 22k base car? Besides that they tested both cars fully loaded. Theres no if's and's about it; The WRX got powned... Well not really just beat. ^___^;

[2ndclasscitizen]

The only problem is that the WRX is an entry model. It has crappy all seasons, a soft suspension and basically it's not performance oriented.Wow, NA WRXs must suck. And saying a WRX isn't performance orientated is one of the stupider things I've read on this forum (except from mentally-challenged noobs of course.)

[NSXType-R]

Wow, NA WRXs must suck. And saying a WRX isn't performance orientated is one of the stupider things I've read on this forum (except from mentally-challenged noobs of course.)

Compared to the STI, the WRX is less performance oriented.

[Quiggs]

Which is like saying a 911 Carrera is less performance oriented than a GT3. While a 911C is still faster than 90% of the cars you'll see on any given day.

[2ndclasscitizen]

Compared to the STI, the WRX is less performance oriented.No s*it Sherlock

[Tomodachi]

Thanks Captain obvious...

[TVR IS KING]

http://www.explosm.net/db/files/Comics/guest4/JAD.jpg

[NSXType-R]

No s*it Sherlock

Which is why when you compare it to the Mazdaspeed 3, it would be lacking in performance. Sorry, should have finished my sentence there. Basically, the Mazdaspeed is all out performance, while the WRX is held back (basically with what it came with stock- the wheel + tire combo and the less sporty suspension compared to the STI kept it from performing at it's best).

[2ndclasscitizen]

Which is why when you compare it to the Mazdaspeed 3, it would be lacking in performance. Sorry, should have finished my sentence there. Basically, the Mazdaspeed is all out performance, while the WRX is held back (basically with what it came with stock- the wheel + tire combo and the less sporty suspension compared to the STI kept it from performing at it's best).
That only makes sense when you're comparing cars based on their place within their manufacturers lineups, which is stupid. The fact that the 3MPS is the absolute high performance 3, whilst the STi takes that place within the Impreza lineup doesn't mean the WRX isn't a high performance vehicle. The WRX used to be a real razor edge car, rode like a bitch, launched like an animal, which people liked, but Subaru has just refined it. Remember, without the WRX, there is no STi. The idea of the STi is to be absolute performance, no compromise. By your argument, the Gallardo is lacking in performance cause of the Enzo, or the S2000 is lacking in performance because of the SLK55AMG, Z4M or Boxster S.

[Tomodachi]

I could not have used a better example. ^_^

[[SLK-AMG]]

there a good looking car.. i like them.:)