PDA

View Full Version : Ford's latest job cuts



Cyco
09-14-2006, 07:18 PM
Ford has announced voluntary redundancies will be offered to all 74,000 union workers in the US.

Further cuts for non-union works will be announced tomorrow.

The_Canuck
09-14-2006, 07:29 PM
I heard about that, BIIIIIIGG cuts....

baddabang
09-14-2006, 07:35 PM
Is that like a buy out?

Spastik_Roach
09-14-2006, 09:37 PM
Its the CLEANERS that are the invisible victims here.

syko
09-15-2006, 01:08 AM
Ford has announced voluntary redundancies will be offered to all 74,000 union workers in the US.

Further cuts for non-union works will be announced tomorrow.

Along with the rest of the "way forward plan"

Dino Scuderia
09-15-2006, 04:16 AM
Have you been driven out by a Ford...lately?!


Ford to Offer Buyouts to Factory Workers
The move is part of a revised and accelerated rescue plan. Meanwhile, two top executives quit.
By John O'Dell, Times Staff Writer
September 15, 2006

Moving to speed and possibly expand its plan to slash 30,000 jobs from its manufacturing payroll, Ford Motor Co. will offer retirement incentives and buyout packages of as much as $140,000 to all employees at its U.S. factories.

More than 75,000 blue-collar workers are eligible for the programs, disclosed Thursday by the United Auto Workers union and acknowledged by Ford.

ADVERTISEMENT
Click here to find out more!
The offer is similar to a retirement and buyout plan offered this year by General Motors Corp. and accepted by 34,000 of its 135,000 union workers.

Separately, two top executives, both manufacturing specialists, quit Ford on Thursday, a week after the automaker hired manufacturing ace Alan Mulally, 61, from Boeing Co. as chief executive.

One of the departing managers, Anne Stevens, chief operating officer of Ford's Americas unit and a coauthor of the company's 8-month-old Way Forward turnaround plan, is one of the highest-ranking women in the auto industry. Also leaving is Dave Szczupak, group vice president of manufacturing for the Americas unit.

"It's change or die at Ford," said David Cole, head of the nonprofit Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich. "What we'll be seeing now is Way Forward on steroids."

Ford, scheduled to unveil details this morning of a revised rescue plan for its shrinking and money-losing North American automotive operation, acknowledged the all-inclusive job-cutting program Thursday but did not provide details.

The union, however, posted a synopsis on its website. The document said Ford wanted workers who accepted the offers to leave the company by Sept. 1 of next year.

Previously, Ford had been taking a slower approach to payroll trimming, offering limited buyouts to workers at selected plants and setting 2012 as the deadline for achieving its goals.

Whereas Cole predicted that 30,000 or more workers would take advantage of Ford's retirement and buyout plans, analyst Craig Hutson of GimmeCredit in New York put the likely number at 20,000 — about one-fourth of its payroll. That's because Ford has fewer U.S. workers than GM, 25% of whose manufacturing employees accepted its offers.

Ford "probably would like almost everyone to take it," Hutson said. The company could then hire temporary workers and pay them lower hourly wages and offer fewer benefits than it was obligated to provide permanent employees under its union contracts.

GM has used temporary workers to replace several thousand employees who accepted its buyouts.

Ford has lost $1.4 billion in the first half this year and is expected to lose far more in the second half from declining sales and charges for its restructuring. A report Thursday in the Detroit News said Ford losses could hit $9 billion.

The automaker recently said it would slash production by 21% in the fourth quarter because of sagging sales of its large sport utility vehicles and pickups and was under pressure from analysts and investors to speed and expand its recovery efforts.

In a statement on the union's website, UAW President Ron Gettelfinger said members were "stepping up to make hard choices under difficult circumstances."

"Now," he said, "it's Ford Motor Co.'s responsibility to lead this company in a positive direction."

According to the UAW document, Ford will offer half a dozen programs, with cash payments to departing workers of $65,000 to $140,000.

The union said the packages also were being offered to its members at Automotive Components Holdings, a group of factories once owned by Visteon Corp., Ford's former parts unit.

"They didn't have any alternative" to broadening the blue-collar buyout and retirement incentive plan, said Sean Egan, auto analyst at Egan-Jones Ratings, a Philadelphia-based corporate bond research firm.

"Ford has to cut expenses, and this could save them billions," he said.

Labor specialists were divided over the value of the program.

It's a "lose-lose" scenario for stockholders, said management consultant Bill Adams of Adams, Nash, Haskell & Sheridan in Cincinnati. "You are going to give away all this money and hope to put yourself in a position to survive, but there is a limit to how long you can."

Labor law specialist Jay Waks, chairman of Kaye Scholer in New York, called the plan a "win-win for Ford and the union."

Ford will probably get volunteers to leave "from among the most senior and highly paid, and it will be left with less senior but probably more productive workers," he said. And the union, Waks said, is able to help Ford without antagonizing members and avoiding a costly strike.

[email protected]

http://www.latimes.com/business/careers/work/la-fi-ford15sep15,1,4780963.story?coll=la-headlines-business-careers

IBrake4Rainbows
09-15-2006, 06:18 AM
Mr. Boeing Strikes hard and fast.....

It's probably best for the company but these poor people......

Birdman002
09-15-2006, 07:31 AM
Well now the Unemployment rates will rise even more.

Dino Scuderia
09-15-2006, 07:38 AM
Well now the Unemployment rates will rise even more.

You say that like the rate is high but it's very low.

NSXType-R
09-15-2006, 12:35 PM
I heard today on the news that Ford could be losing up to $9 billion. :eek:

As long as it doesn't affect Aston Martin, I'm happy. :p

"Clevor" Angel
09-15-2006, 01:16 PM
There was an article, I think in the Detroit Free Press, mentioning Ford not selling, suspending or shutting down any of its brands.

adrenaline
09-16-2006, 10:55 PM
Ford is not immediately reconfiguring the status of it's brands, but they HAVE hired an analyst to explore benefits of selling off complete or partial brands. On the chopping block are Land Rover, Aston Martin.

The Way Forward 2.0 still won't just work by cutting labour. They have to make people want to buy their cars. The Edge CUV should do well later this year, but that's the only all new model (off the top of my head) for this year. William said that they have 6 new models for 2007.

The_Canuck
09-17-2006, 07:08 AM
Ford is not immediately reconfiguring the status of it's brands, but they HAVE hired an analyst to explore benefits of selling off complete or partial brands. On the chopping block are Land Rover, Aston Martin.

The Way Forward 2.0 still won't just work by cutting labour. They have to make people want to buy their cars. The Edge CUV should do well later this year, but that's the only all new model (off the top of my head) for this year. William said that they have 6 new models for 2007.
Pfft...idiots, Land Rover and Aston Martin are doing well, I say axe mercury and make better pruducts for lincoln, if you must mabye sell Jaguar too...

rev440
09-17-2006, 10:54 AM
A local plant is being closed down. It should leave alot of people jobless.

IBrake4Rainbows
09-17-2006, 10:27 PM
Pfft...idiots, Land Rover and Aston Martin are doing well, I say axe mercury and make better pruducts for lincoln, if you must mabye sell Jaguar too...

Land Rover and Jaguar will not make money this year. despite their good product.

Fords words, not mine.

Just because a company is advanced and a market leader does not automatically translate into sales.

IWantAnAudiRS6
09-18-2006, 12:02 AM
IMHO, a company that has 3 separate marques with exactly the same badge-engineered cars needs a slap.

Fordincolncury should really concentrate on making better products.

The new Discovery 3 isn't going to make Ford money? Pah. And the Range Rover has been a strong seller for years. The Jaguar XK won't exactly save them, but it should sell well- by the looks of the roads around here, it has done a good job. And Aston Martin are earning a few bob...

I feel sorry for all the poor sods who are going to be out of a job. It happened to my dad a few years ago, and it took ages to find him a new job. Dark days...

IBrake4Rainbows
09-18-2006, 12:10 AM
Land Rover has forecasted they will make a loss for this Financial year. we all know about Jaguar but AM i'm not entirely sure about.

It's true that ForColUry do compete in reasonably similar markets - It's strange that the main name of the business is used for the lowest of the three brands :(

Still, IMHO Mercury is lookin mighty shaky right now.

adrenaline
09-18-2006, 12:48 AM
Mercury I hate. Buy a Mercury if you want to pay extra for a Ford with chrome.

IMO, Ford will be reluctant to sell Jaguar because they have poured billions into their operations. Aston and Land Rover are good, but they don't make huge profit.

Ford said that selling Aston made sense because their dealer network is vastly different to what Ford has. The entire brand is based on different architecture so to say.

Cyco
09-18-2006, 07:33 AM
Aston has just turned its 2nd profit in history, but billions were spend on the new chassis system and facilities. It is a halo brand many would like to own.

Jag despite the billions still isnt profitable - this may be due to Detroit not allowing it its own chassis program (that worked so well for AM).

Land Rover doesnt appear to be turning a profit this year, despite having what should be a popular product. The weight of their cars and congestion taxes combined with increasing petrol prices can't be helping their sales.

Of the US based brands they appear to have missed the mark in changing consumer desires. From what I can gather the quality (percieved) hasnt increased at the rate the market expects/demands nor has the products offered.

2ndclasscitizen
09-18-2006, 03:35 PM
Jag despite the billions still isnt profitable - this may be due to Detroit not allowing it its own chassis program (that worked so well for AM).I thought the XJS and new XK both had all new Jag-designed chassis'?

IBrake4Rainbows
09-18-2006, 10:40 PM
I think it's a derivative chassis. but if it is new it shows what Jaguar are capable of - it's the best new Jag in a long time.