Crx Concept

[MRDETROITMETAL]

Base was a 1700 pix reduced to 1025, & yeah I had to clean it up after reduction, it is all brushed to achieve the redesign which is when I seen to encounter the most compression, so I am working to get as good a upload as possible here, therefore two uploads one direct the other Imageshack...:

Let's try & keep the snide comments to a minimum this time, as I am more interested in if you can see any differences to each upload, OK ?
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/585/crxredo3uh3.jpg

[MRDETROITMETAL]

here it is in 800 size ???...tell me wat you see diff wise PLZ.

:confused:
THANKS:D

[Coventrysucks]

Pic 1 - "Art look", but done well - sharp, distinct lines - looks like a painting of metal

Pic 2 - "Art look" wobbly lines, looks rubbish.

It is the fact that it is a "riced" CRX and a high incidence of #2 that stops this from being very good.

Not a fan of the wheel arches at all either.

And can you please not link to pictures more than 800 pix wide, as it knackers the page layout, and peoples' connections. Use the attachment system for larger pictures, as you have done.

[Esperante]

Much better. This is a primary example of why not to use shitty filters. Though the bonnet does look uncanny Fiero like...

[MRDETROITMETAL]

THX !!!...Coventry, I did leave some rough edge parts and sure I could keep blending in layers, but was impatient to see if this would work better ...LOL. & ESP, i think it looks more 80-90's Dodge Daytona, but I see the Fireo look too, & most of the time I dont use Filters at all, but sometimes the layer adjustments can cause that effect too...I have to pay more attrention to the resultive look, but by the time I get a picture done ...lol, my eyes are all snow blind. !!!
Therefore it takes a day or so to come back & SEE what I actually got !!!...lol.

THX ALOT to both of you for the comments as they do assist me in steppin up the pictures.

[külkedisi]

bad I THİNK sorry:(