PDA

View Full Version : 2008 Chevrolet Malibu breaks cover



adrenaline
12-29-2006, 12:30 AM
General Motors will use January's Detroit auto show to showcase its new 2008 Chevrolet Malibu sedan. It uses an extended version of the company's new front-wheel-drive Epsilon platform, which already underpins the Pontiac G6 and Saturn Aura. GM made certain the new Malibu is substantially longer than any of its competitors, including the Toyota Camry, Ford Fusion, and Honda Accord.

Power comes from a 2.4-liter Ecotec four-cylinder engine in the base model, rated at 164 horsepower — 20 more than the previous model. A more powerful 3.6-liter V6 is also available, offering 252 horsepower (compared to the old 224 hp).

As previously reported, the interior of the new Malibu has been completely revamped, with an emphasis on higher quality materials and assembly.

I've uploaded a few images. For a complete gallery, head to: http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/29/2008-chevrolet-malibu/#more-4594

This must be a pretty important entry into the midsize market for Chevy. The front/ interior are magic. The rear, IMO, is terrible.

So, is this a Camry killer?

Spastik_Roach
12-29-2006, 01:53 AM
Whats up with the stupid (probably) fake wood in the interior? Replace that with some aluminium perhaps and then we'd have all around quite a nice car. The rear end is so much a copy of a Passat its not funny though.

http://www.km77.com/marcas/volkswagen/2005/passat/gama/med/16.jpg

adrenaline
12-29-2006, 02:03 AM
Whats up with the stupid (probably) fake wood in the interior? Replace that with some aluminium perhaps and then we'd have all around quite a nice car.

Here's one with plastic aluminium :D

http://images.leftlanenews.com/content/15-2008-chevrolet-malibu.jpg

drakkie
12-29-2006, 02:56 AM
Please dont tell us this hideous banger comes to Europe too in 2008 :o

Spastik_Roach
12-29-2006, 04:16 AM
Here's one with plastic aluminium :D

http://images.leftlanenews.com/content/15-2008-chevrolet-malibu.jpg

Better than fake wood...

Waugh-terfall
12-29-2006, 04:41 AM
I cannot believe I'm actually saying this, but, I actually quite like it with the wood... Shoot me now... Please.

Slicks
12-29-2006, 05:26 AM
Please dont tell us this hideous banger comes to Europe too in 2008 :o
Its there already, its called the Opel Vectra....

Waugh-terfall
12-29-2006, 05:28 AM
The Vectra and the Malibu are 2 totally different cars...

drakkie
12-29-2006, 05:31 AM
The Vectra and the Malibu are 2 totally different cars...

Maybe they do just share platforms(IIRC the Vectra was on the Zeta). GM is a big fan of that... :rolleyes: unfortunately :o

Waugh-terfall
12-29-2006, 05:59 AM
Maybe they do just share platforms(IIRC the Vectra was on the Zeta). GM is a big fan of that... :rolleyes: unfortunately :o

Maybe. But I think the Malibu is smaller than the Vectra or t'other way round.

clutch-monkey
12-29-2006, 06:00 AM
Maybe they do just share platforms(IIRC the Vectra was on the Zeta). GM is a big fan of that... :rolleyes: unfortunately :o
isn't the vectra FWD? how is that supposed to go on GM's RWD zeta platform...

fpv_gtho
12-29-2006, 06:04 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_Epsilon_platform

Waugh-terfall
12-29-2006, 06:06 AM
isn't the vectra FWD? how is that supposed to go on GM's RWD zeta platform...

Correct, and I don't know..

Hmm, well, you gotta love Wikipedia!

Ferrer
12-29-2006, 08:38 AM
I think it's not that bad, and I also think this car is a lot bigger than the Vectra.

One think is curious, when I saw the Chevrolet steering wheel I couldn't help thinking Daewoo...

Waugh-terfall
12-29-2006, 09:03 AM
I really like this car, if I lived in America, I'd be inclined to buy one... This side view really looks a bit like one of those Holden things, I can't remember which one, but it's one of them!

GM really have ruined the Chevrolet name, a long standing company name that everybody knows of, and they go and stick it in the mud, pour sloppy poo over it and spit on it many-a-time by putting on the front of a sodding Daewoo... I actually wrote a letter of complaint to General Motors when this was announced. lol!

Timothy (in VA)
12-29-2006, 09:05 AM
I really rather like the look of the interior (of course, this being GM, the quality likely stinks), but as far as the exterior goes, GM is going to have to do a lot better than that.

NSXType-R
12-29-2006, 09:18 AM
Yes, that rear end really is ugly. I never really liked Chevys (or American cars for that matter) and this is a big reason why.

cmcpokey
12-29-2006, 11:51 AM
i think that all around this is not horrible. i would even venture to say its one of the better chevy sedans of recent history

baddabang
12-29-2006, 09:39 PM
Compared to the current Malibu this one is gorgeous.

lets hope the interior is as good as it looks in the picture.

Matt
12-30-2006, 11:06 AM
I really rather like the look of the interior (of course, this being GM, the quality likely stinks)


Maybe they do just share platforms(IIRC the Vectra was on the Zeta). GM is a big fan of that... :rolleyes: unfortunately :o


Please dont tell us this hideous banger comes to Europe too in 2008 :o


Whats up with the stupid (probably) fake wood in the interior?

None of you have seen this car, let alone ride or drive it. The only reason you have anything negative to say about it is because of the country it comes from. Do you not all understand stupid that is? Do you not give anyone or anything the chance to improve? Has it never happened? Give things a chance, wait until you actually know something and stop making ignorant comments.

LandQuail
12-30-2006, 01:53 PM
I'll give Chevy the benefit of the doubt when they quit making front-wheel-drive sedans without even a sporting pretense. They threatened the world with a V-8 in the new Impala, until we found out even this was front-wheel drive and nobody bought one.

Dodge, excuse me, DaimlerChrysler, has proven America still, miraculously after such a long automotive coma, remembers what an American car should be: RWD, V8, and bloody huge. Who cares if Dodge cars are assembled from Mercedes' tablescraps.

GM has had plenty of time to figure out their current midsize sedan formula isn't worth a ****, and they've had at least one American company show them how to do it right. If they're still making FWD cars that are boring to look at, drive, ride in, or even write about, I can't imagine the market being any kinder to them than I am, which it isn't.

Which is a shame. Chevrolet did used to be a fantastic manufacturer.

Matt
12-30-2006, 02:20 PM
I'll give Chevy the benefit of the doubt when they quit making front-wheel-drive sedans without even a sporting pretense. They threatened the world with a V-8 in the new Impala, until we found out even this was front-wheel drive and nobody bought one.

Dodge, excuse me, DaimlerChrysler, has proven America still, miraculously after such a long automotive coma, remembers what an American car should be: RWD, V8, and bloody huge. Who cares if Dodge cars are assembled from Mercedes' tablescraps.

GM has had plenty of time to figure out their current midsize sedan formula isn't worth a ****, and they've had at least one American company show them how to do it right. If they're still making FWD cars that are boring to look at, drive, ride in, or even write about, I can't imagine the market being any kinder to them than I am, which it isn't.

Which is a shame. Chevrolet did used to be a fantastic manufacturer.

There are a lot of people who have no need or desire for a sporting car. Nearly every mainstream company makes cars that have no sporting intentions. I don't think the non-sportiness of a car has anything to do with its success. I think build quality, style, heritage and public opinion of a company/model has much more to do with it than any kind of sporting intentions.

thatdbeme
12-30-2006, 06:14 PM
None of you have seen this car, let alone ride or drive it. The only reason you have anything negative to say about it is because of the country it comes from. Do you not all understand stupid that is? Do you not give anyone or anything the chance to improve? Has it never happened? Give things a chance, wait until you actually know something and stop making ignorant comments.

GM have to prove themselves before people stop saying negative things about them.

mattmacklind
12-30-2006, 11:14 PM
Well, it does look like a strong improvement over the current Malibu. First off, I hated that they brought back the Malibu name. The old Malibu was kind of cool in a kischy way. Should have left it alone.

The Malibu Maxx was a good idea. A four seat hatch, kind of like and americanized Saab. Unfortunately, it wasn't quite so nice. I just drove in a rental that was I think one year old. Now, granted, rentals often take abuse, but after one year the litle screens that cover the backseat overhead "moonroofs" wouldn't close anyore and instead just hung there nto the passengers face, not to mentin the incredible cheapness of all interior materials. It just looked really bad, and these cars aren't exactly the bottom of the budget barrel. Anyway, after my encounter with a Malibu I must say I was sorely disappointed, hopefully things might improve with the new design.

LandQuail
12-31-2006, 11:18 AM
I've also driven a current Malibu. It feels better than a Cavalier, but I use the term "better" in the same spirit I'd say Cathy Bates is more do-able than Nancy Reagan.

It's light years behind Honda's Accord or Toyota's Camry, and much worse than Hyundai's better-equipped, cheaper mini-luxury-barge who's alphabet soup name escapes me.

Anyway, Matt, you're from Kansas (properly pronounced Kan-saw), which makes you almost as American as me. (kidding) I do love me some Chevies, as I'm sure you do, but I would never, never give any company a pat on the back sticking with the same basic formula they've used since 19-****ing-84 with the soulless, tasteless, K-cars.

That formula is: front wheel drive, transverse I-4 or V-6, bland styling, (and from here on I'm taking educated guesses, I admit) numb steering, understeer aplenty, and if GM doesn't let the new Malibu roll off the showroom floor with plastic wheel covers, I'll eat my hat.

GM doesn't have a reputation for midsized cars anymore. Tell me how the Chevy Lumina was noticably better or worse than the current Malibu, or current Impala? How was a 2003 Cavalier better than a 1985 Cavalier?

Admittedly, the Cobalt is a breath of fresh air, but that makes one-in-a-row for GM. That isn't the sign of in impending winning streak, in this quail's book.

Again, I'd ask you to look at the success DaimlerChrysler has had with their cars. They've even won contracts to put the Charger into police cruiser service. People look at a car with dynamic, bold styling; powerful engines (including a line of V-8's, which is what drives so many Americans to purchase SUV's, I think) rear-wheel-drive, and, well, character.

Who ever drove a Malibu and felt like they had any special connection to it? Yes, the heftier women and the elderly seem to like them, but that's about it. The Malibu seems to have been concieved as a monument to mediocrity. I personally find it to be trite, top-heavy, and pedestrian. And overly pedantic.

Sorry. I just hate those cars. I hope Holden's fiddling can do for GM what Mercedes did for Chrysler (which used to make cars even worse than GM), but I haven't seen it yet, though GM threatens to bring the Commodore to America.

Anyway, cheers.

Matt
12-31-2006, 11:33 AM
Anyway, Matt, you're from Kansas (properly pronounced Kan-saw), which makes you almost as American as me. (kidding) I do love me some Chevies, as I'm sure you do, but I would never, never give any company a pat on the back sticking with the same basic formula they've used since 19-****ing-84 with the soulless, tasteless, K-cars.

I'm not in any way defending the past American cars. I have as much disdain for what the domestic makers have been building up until the last couple years as everyone else. But, to completely dismiss the major advances made by Chrysler, Cadillac and even Lincoln is not fair. The LS was a HUGE leap forward for Lincoln. The CTS was even bigger for Cadillac. Obviously we don't even need to debate the success Chrysler has had with the 300. If these three companies can make such vast improvements within a single product cycle, why not give each successive product cycle the same benefit of the doubt?

I'm not saying that the Malibu is for sure as much of an improvement as I hope it is, but not a single one of us has driven it yet. Not a single one of us has read a review of it yet. And most of the opinions in this thread are bashing it already. It's simply ignorant and illogical.

LandQuail
12-31-2006, 03:10 PM
Yeah, you've got me there. I guess I'm still sore over the new Impala scare. They had commercials on TV for a while nearly a year ago for the new impala. They never showed much of the car; just the profile, the words V-8, and some horsepower figure hovering near 300.

I remember thinking 'chevy's got it right, finally.'

Little did anybody know we were in for a car more akin to the V8 Taurus SHO than a 300C.

Chevy took that mystery V8, probably a Northstar stripped of its badging, and crammed in sideways into the hood of a car that looked utterly, utterly bland and scoots itself along with its front wheels.

I've never seen one on the road, though I seriously might not even notice it.


Sure, sure. The new Malibu might be much better, on par with the Japanese and Korean competition, even, but I wish GM would remember what an American car is after forgetting long enough to discontinue even the Camaro.

Yep, Matt, we're on the same side here, we're just seeing that old halfway full or empty glass different. Let's stop now, before we start writing hip-hop songs about each other.

Cheers.

Slicks
12-31-2006, 06:59 PM
Chevy took that mystery V8, probably a Northstar stripped of its badging, and crammed in sideways into the hood of a car that looked utterly, utterly bland and scoots itself along with its front wheels.

Mystery V8? Its an LS4, a destroked LSx engine with DOD. Nothing mysterious about it.
And BTW, they are supposed to be going RWD with the next gen Impala, and other 4 door sedans.

LandQuail
01-01-2007, 11:19 AM
Can't happen soon enough.

Gtek-i
01-01-2007, 02:11 PM
I've uploaded a few images. For a complete gallery, head to: http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/29/2008-chevrolet-malibu/#more-4594

This must be a pretty important entry into the midsize market for Chevy. The front/ interior are magic. The rear, IMO, is terrible.

So, is this a Camry killer?

I'd rather die in a Smart Car...the exterior looks like a bad imitation of a European car and the interior is a mustang

Waugh-terfall
01-01-2007, 02:45 PM
I've also driven a current Malibu. It feels better than a Cavalier, but I use the term "better" in the same spirit I'd say Cathy Bates is more do-able than Nancy Reagan.

It's light years behind Honda's Accord or Toyota's Camry, and much worse than Hyundai's better-equipped, cheaper mini-luxury-barge who's alphabet soup name escapes me.

Anyway, Matt, you're from Kansas (properly pronounced Kan-saw), which makes you almost as American as me. (kidding) I do love me some Chevies, as I'm sure you do, but I would never, never give any company a pat on the back sticking with the same basic formula they've used since 19-****ing-84 with the soulless, tasteless, K-cars.

That formula is: front wheel drive, transverse I-4 or V-6, bland styling, (and from here on I'm taking educated guesses, I admit) numb steering, understeer aplenty, and if GM doesn't let the new Malibu roll off the showroom floor with plastic wheel covers, I'll eat my hat.

GM doesn't have a reputation for midsized cars anymore. Tell me how the Chevy Lumina was noticably better or worse than the current Malibu, or current Impala? How was a 2003 Cavalier better than a 1985 Cavalier?

Admittedly, the Cobalt is a breath of fresh air, but that makes one-in-a-row for GM. That isn't the sign of in impending winning streak, in this quail's book.

Again, I'd ask you to look at the success DaimlerChrysler has had with their cars. They've even won contracts to put the Charger into police cruiser service. People look at a car with dynamic, bold styling; powerful engines (including a line of V-8's, which is what drives so many Americans to purchase SUV's, I think) rear-wheel-drive, and, well, character.

Who ever drove a Malibu and felt like they had any special connection to it? Yes, the heftier women and the elderly seem to like them, but that's about it. The Malibu seems to have been concieved as a monument to mediocrity. I personally find it to be trite, top-heavy, and pedestrian. And overly pedantic.

Sorry. I just hate those cars. I hope Holden's fiddling can do for GM what Mercedes did for Chrysler (which used to make cars even worse than GM), but I haven't seen it yet, though GM threatens to bring the Commodore to America.

Anyway, cheers.

My family went to America (Florida) for 2 weeks in March/April '04 and hired a brand new Cobalt LS Auto 4dr with a whole array of options, we were expecting it to be absolutely aweful but found it to be rather pleasent. The interior was quite nice and well laid out, though not all too high quality. The XM Satelite was really, really cool, the 2.2L Ecotec engine seemed plenty powerful enough to pull a family of 4 plus luggage around and the ride & seats were pretty comfy, there was even enough room in the back for me! I loved how you could set the alarm off and sets the lights going from the remote, had some great fun scaring people with that in the Publix & Sweetbay carparks. I really liked the car, I liked all the cars we saw out there despite the shocking cheapness of them. Our Cobalt was wasn't without it's faults. Dad overshot our turning on I-Drive, Orlando, stood on the brake and swung the wheel right round (body roll & tyre squeal ftw) and a huge array of warning lights came on, 2 days later, they were all gone... :confused: Still all-in-all, I thought it was great.

Thus I reckon the Malibu won't be too bad, Chevy are turning themselves around. It still may not be great underneath or inside, but both outside and in, it certainly looks the part.

Esperante
01-01-2007, 07:25 PM
You went to Florida for vacation? That's gotta suck.

cmcpokey
01-01-2007, 07:44 PM
its the land of mickey, dude.

and besides, in another month florida will be my home. so back off.

Waugh-terfall
01-02-2007, 01:52 PM
You went to Florida for vacation? That's gotta suck.

Florida's awesome! I wannt go back!!!! But '07 is Turkey :(

cmcpokey
01-02-2007, 03:42 PM
Florida's awesome! I wannt go back!!!! But '07 is Turkey :(
you say that like its a bad thing, i would love to go to turkey

LandQuail
01-25-2007, 10:18 AM
There is no God in Florida. Worst vacation of my life...

Its too long a story to tell, but the trip ended with a panic-retreat from a $40/night motel in Destin.

Aw, hell. It's a pretty good story.

I'd just turned 19, and me and a couple friends decided to take a week's vacation one summer. For some reason, we picked Florida over Mexico, which is a decision we all regret. At least in Mexico, you expect everything to be ****ed up.

So, we drive to Destin, Florida in high spirits, and check into the cheapest motel we can find. We went to the beach for a while, bought Booze on a fake I.D., and settled in for a night of quiet drinking-in.

By about 2 a.m., we were all pretty drunk, and one of my hillbilly buddies, who still goes by "Deer Chili" had gone a few doors down to party with a bunch of local rich-kid ravers. Not my scene, but to each his own.

He said he'd be right back, so we didn't worry until my other friend tried to call him. One time, the phone picked up on what my friend said "sounded like hell." It just rang without an answer whenever he tried to call again.

I went looking for Deer Chili at around 5 a.m.. Apparently, they'd fed him X, which, on top of the towering whisky drunk he'd been riding for the previous two days, must have turned him into a goddamn werewolf. The motel suite appeared deserted, except for one fat kid, and there were signs of violence everywhere. A lamp was smashed. The TV was in the kitchen sink. The drapes were torn from the wall and broken glass and cigarette butts littered the floor The fat kid was sitting on the couch, looking dazed or drunk or high or rollin' or god knows what.
I asked him if he'd seen a guy with no shirt and a big sombrero who talked like me and was carrying a bottle of whisky (that would have been Old Deer Chili). The fat kid said yes, and pointed to a closed bedroom door pulsating with that god-awful shit the ravers listen to.
"But don't go in there," he said. "They're doing drugs in there."

Whisky makes you open doors what maybe oughn't be opened. Deer Chili, bless his soul, didn't belong in that room. I could feel it.

Well, I'd been drinkin' whisky too. And I recognized by this point I was on a rescue mission, so I went in.

The smell of sweat and pot was nauseating. These kids had been partying in this foul motel suite for days, and they'd come to the party loaded for bear. There was another familiar smell I couldn't identify. I opened that door onto a scene that, at first, looked like something straight out of a Bosch landscape. No Lights; there were dim figures and glowing streaks everywhere. It looked like the room was full of glowing bats, swooping and diving. My brain just couldn't process it, but something awful was clearly happening in there.

As my eyes adjusted to the light cast by the green glowing display on the boom-box, I made out a raver dude leaning over the bed waving handfuls of glow sticks around. I think it was supposed to trippy, or 'third-eye-opening' some such raver-nonsense, but a raver girl laying back on the bed seemed to be enjoying the hell out of it. She had her hand down her pants anyway.

Before I had time to process this awful scene, I spotted Deer Chili across the room. He was in bad shape. He was leaning against the opposite wall, still clutching his whisky and a cigarette that had burned down to the filter and extinguished itself. Even in the dim light, I could tell he was crying, and I barely heard him say "Joe, you've got to get me out of here" over the music.

I shoved that damn raver out of the way and waded through a room filled with empties and trash. I grabbed Deer Chili by the arm and pulled him out of there before the ravers had a clue anybody had ever came in.
Poor Deer Chili... His sombrero was hanging by its cord down on his back and his eyes were blood-red. He looked like some sort of crazy, broken, new-age cowboy. He was crying, I later found out, because those two damn ravers had blown Vic's Vap-O-Rub into his eyes.

On our way out, he told the fat kid to "go back to the sea; go back to the big water." Never did know what he meant by that one, but I think it was a reference to the movie Free Willy.

As it turned out, he'd gone over to the party and started some shit with the ravers. Ravers, as some of you may know, can't fight worth a damn, while a drunken hillbilly is basically a killing machine. Anyway, he'd gone through the lot of them like a bull in a china shop, and single-handedly broken up the party. But not before making a couple friends, who fed him pot and X until he was so far gone he let them blow Vap-o-rub, that liquid stuff you're supposed to rub on your chest when you've got the flu, into his open eyeballs. From that point, he was effectively blind, and said after looking for "I don't know how long" for the door he gave up on finding any way out of that bedroom.

By this time the sun was rising, and we all just wanted to get the **** out of Florida and that damn motel before we all got arrested and wound up in some sort of reverse-deliverance nightmare. I got behind the wheel, still drunk, pointed my old Toyota Land Cruiser back towards Arkansas, and we chirped the **** out of the joint — we did not look back. The three of us didn't say a word until we crossed the state line and got ourselves out of that god-forsaken state.


And that is why I believe God does not exist in Florida.

worst day of my life. never going to that state again. hope it falls off and sinks.

The_Canuck
02-01-2007, 10:14 PM
Thats an awesome story.

LandQuail
05-04-2007, 11:06 PM
You're goddamn right it is. And every word's true.

baddabang
05-05-2007, 07:24 PM
Awesome story as usual landquail. :)

The last motel I stayed at in the sunshine state was packed full of rice powered Hondas, Toyotas, and Nissan's driven by preppy white kids with popped collars who insisted on launching bottle rockets, and setting off M80 firecrackers until 5 AM. When you've just driven 1,000 miles from NY anybody would be grumpy, and I was not a happy camper.

LandQuail
05-06-2007, 11:40 PM
Awesome story as usual landquail. :)

The last motel I stayed at in the sunshine state was packed full of rice powered Hondas, Toyotas, and Nissan's driven by preppy white kids with popped collars who insisted on launching bottle rockets, and setting off M80 firecrackers until 5 AM. When you've just driven 1,000 miles from NY anybody would be grumpy, and I was not a happy camper.

The Quail is full of 'em.

Next time, (and this goes for any UCP members, since I'm drunk and generous) skip florida altogether and go to New Orleans. I've been told it's a hell of a trip since Katrina wiped it off the face of the earth. It's nothing like it used to be, since what New Orleans used to be is dead, but the recently-tattered and more-recently-whitewashed carcass is a study in the ironic and the absurd.

The good news is: A very vocal but still underground minority is screaming for the inevitable downgrade that will bring the "Disney" New-New Orleans to it's knees.

And, while you're on your way, you can stop off at the home of LandQuail in Conway, Arkansas for a meal and a drink. My wife-to-be and I can even provide a guest bedroom and drive to and from the Little Rock Airport.

Bring it on. There's nothing a proud Arkansan loves more than someone testing their hospitality.