Classic Ferrari

[MRDETROITMETAL]

Now this one has alot of details in it, and a good bit of time too, tho it seems like I did not do all that much.
That was kinda the purpose, to make it look like it was not chopped at all.;)

[McReis]

How to make the pretty look hideous..

[MRDETROITMETAL]

???...Dude, there actually is a Ferrari that looks very similar to this,
...it was called the Testarossa from 1957....
go look it up, cuz that was my model here.
That & the Chrysler Fire Arrows designed by Ghia.

[McReis]

???...Dude, there actually is a Ferrari that looks very similar to this,
...it was called the Testarossa from 1957....
go look it up, cuz that was my model here.
That & the Chrysler Fire Arrows designed by Ghia.
I don't need to look up for the Testa Rossa since every real car enthusiast has it's looks always fresh in mind. And honestly I can't see a resemblance.

[Blitz_]

..i dont see it

[X-Raited]

I dont see it Either

[RT15]

I don't see any photo on forum...

[dydzi]

???...Dude, there actually is a Ferrari that looks very similar to this,
...it was called the Testarossa from 1957....
go look it up, cuz that was my model here.
That & the Chrysler Fire Arrows designed by Ghia.

there was no such a thing as Testarossa in 1957... still good you know how to spell Ferrari :)

[Gtek-i]

I don't see any photo on forum...
I seriously can't see it...

[nopassn]

The "not seeing attachements" issue is currently being investigated by the powers that be...

EDIT: now that the attachments are fixed - I can safely say that this looks like a jacked up 340 Mexico knock-off/wanna-be thing.

[Cotterik]

bet it kicks ass in the dark.

also, i think you're sharpening your work too much in ratio to the resolution

[RT15]

I still don't see anything...

[X-Raited]

I can see it Now.. :S

[BIGWORM_25]

I can see it Now.. :S
No Ferrari Testarossa in 1957.....

Once AGAIN you are soooooo confused....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrari_Testarossa

TESTA ROSSAS....idiot.

LOL...DOODZ yuo aer sooooo powned!!!! freaking sofa king we got it.

[Ferrer]

there was no such a thing as Testarossa in 1957... still good you know how to spell Ferrari :)
I wasn't technically called the Testarossa, but there was the 250 TR ;)

And this car looks nothing like it.

[Leo_Ant]

People shouldn't mess with classics. That's why they're classics: they weren't messed up...

[IWantAnAudiRS6]

bet it kicks ass in the dark.
Brilliant :D

And I think this is hideous. Not amazingly clean, terrible design, easily one of your most evil designs to date- more for subject content than anything.

[whiteballz]

you tried to made an italian classic look like it came from the US?

[Vindesh17]

try to imagine your own face without eyes and then you'll see how hideous this looks to us

[Kooper]

The chop as a whole doesn't appeal to me, but in your defense you've done some nice work with the reflections.

The details are nicely executed, they just don't belong on this car in my opinion.

[MRDETROITMETAL]

you tried to made an italian classic look like it came from the US?


YES...exactly prob closer to the Chrysler Fire Arrow cars ...but the Conceptual Idea was the TR or even as mentioned the Mexico.

Yes it is hard to change a classic design, that is why I did it....all other things aside, it has a unique look to it & that is all I really could expect to acheive with something like this to start with.:rolleyes:

[ferrarifreak013]

try to imagine your own face without eyes and then you'll see how hideous this looks to us
that post made my day thank you!