Brabus:K8+100 bhp=SV 12 bi turbo

[kinan.f]

BRABUS introduced its newest top of the range SL & named it the SV12 bi turbo due to its gigantic V12 6.3 litres producing 640 bhp taking the vehicle to its 100 kmh in just 4.2 secs.
New additions may be noticed from the previous K8 model which was 5.4 litres V8 engine devoloping 530 bhp hitting the 100 kmh in just 4.4 secs.
SV now has a face different from its little sister the K8 as Brabus decided to exclude Merc's 3 pointed star from its front view....
More tech. may be found @http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame.mv?file=car.mv&num=1675&left=
For info on the K8:http://www.supercars.net/cars/2002@$Mercedes-Benz%20Brabus@$K8g.html
The new SV 12 bi turbo's image follows:
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/large/1675-1.jpg
I've attached an image of the K8 with this thread.

[motorhead]

thats brabus at its finest - well almost they can do better things, ML which travels at 350++km, thats what they can do

[motormaniac]

compare that to the renntech sl, u can throw this into the sea

[motorhead]

thrpw that renntech and kleemans away look at this

[motorhead]

this has 1300++ hp accelerates in 3.2 sec and top speed about 350km/h - FAST

[motormaniac]

ok, r they actually selling this?

[motorhead]

yeah about 10-20(LOL) a lot eh

[kinan.f]

Originally posted by motorhead
this has 1300++ hp accelerates in 3.2 sec and top speed about 350km/h - FAST
What is this cute babe's name?

[motorhead]

its called the brabus sl 7.3(you know brabus is famous for their 6.1 litre engines but this is 7.3 litres)

[kinan.f]

Originally posted by motorhead
its called the brabus sl 7.3(you know brabus is famous for their 6.1 litre engines but this is 7.3 litres)
Amazing.

[Scientist]

You know, they test this car's topspeed on the Autobahn near Bottrop...damn more than 300 km/h on a public road! I think I'll move to Germany some day :)

[motorhead]

good for you

[guyt_x]

people lets think about this a car with a 7 litre engine has to be fast. You dont have to be a genius to create a 7 litre car that is fast.
If BMW made a 7 litre car it would go back in time never mind beat this waste of engine space.

[Kudosdude]

I have to agree with Guy, ish. Why does it take a turbo to make this power out of 7.0 litres?

Ah well, horses for courses.

[guyt_x]

ok I didnt read it had a turbo!!

ok merc are then soooooo pathertic

shame

please dont tell its an automatic!!
shame

[motorhead]

do you guys know the consequences of using a small engine over a big one - ok lets take mercedes benz. they love using huge engines and with tubos or supercharges for that added power - have you all heard of the worlds most unsecessful upercar the JAGUAR XJ 220 - jag wanted to use a v12 but they threw away that idea and they brought in a v6 and they twin turbo charged it ans the v6 has massive loads of reliability problems because the engine was too small for the emmence power of the two turbos especially when you power the car - mercedes benzs all over the world are known for their reliability(but BMW is better though)and thus they need to keep their ullet proof reliability up with the big boys thus they do no want to strain the huge engine and by the way the brabus sl 7.3 is not force inducted its uses the zonda engine which merc themselves created. its fast though and it looks good and by the way why do you all even care if the power and looks are there thats it - people don't really care much about the fuel economy - wheather it drinks like a dipsomaniac or not buyers do not really care - thy are just too rich and besides how often are they going to drive it

[motormaniac]

Originally posted by motorhead
do you guys know the consequences of using a small engine over a big one - ok lets take mercedes benz. they love using huge engines and with tubos or supercharges for that added power - have you all heard of the worlds most unsecessful upercar the JAGUAR XJ 220 - jag wanted to use a v12 but they threw away that idea and they brought in a v6 and they twin turbo charged it ans the v6 has massive loads of reliability problems because the engine was too small for the emmence power of the two turbos especially when you power the car - mercedes benzs all over the world are known for their reliability(but BMW is better though)and thus they need to keep their ullet proof reliability up with the big boys thus they do no want to strain the huge engine and by the way the brabus sl 7.3 is not force inducted its uses the zonda engine which merc themselves created. its fast though and it looks good and by the way why do you all even care if the power and looks are there thats it - people don't really care much about the fuel economy - wheather it drinks like a dipsomaniac or not buyers do not really care - thy are just too rich and besides how often are they going to drive it

hmm, the point of a supercar.....to show off?

[Kudosdude]

do you guys know the consequences of using a small engine over a big one

Do you know the consequences of using a large engine and turbocharging it, when a smaller normally aspirated one will do?

Improved throttle response
Lighter engine
better handling
less fuel consumption etc. etc.

I'm not knocking the car or the engine; but the power output from this engine seems a bit pathetic when you consider its vast size AND it isn't normally aspirated.

Feel free to laugh at the 220 all you like; I cannot comment on the V6 reliability issues, but I do remember that it was the brakes that always came to criticism; NOT the engine. Oh, and the 220 was produced 14 years ago. That's almost older than you isn't it?

[motorhead]

Originally posted by motormaniac
hmm, the point of a supercar.....to show off?
nobody seems to be driving their supercar like a supercar so i guess yeah to show off - and by the way every ferrari i have seen on the road so far - they were all travelling below 50km/h on an empty long layer of tarmac(which is the road)

[motorhead]

Originally posted by Kudosdude
Do you know the consequences of using a large engine and turbocharging it, when a smaller normally aspirated one will do?

Improved throttle response
Lighter engine
better handling
less fuel consumption etc. etc.

I'm not knocking the car or the engine; but the power output from this engine seems a bit pathetic when you consider its vast size AND it isn't normally aspirated.

Feel free to laugh at the 220 all you like; I cannot comment on the V6 reliability issues, but I do remember that it was the brakes that always came to criticism; NOT the engine. Oh, and the 220 was produced 14 years ago. That's almost older than you isn't it?
we are talking about forced inducted engines here

[Kudosdude]

we are talking about forced inducted engines here

Sorry motorhead - but what is your point?

[motormaniac]

i love this car

[motorhead]

Originally posted by Kudosdude
Sorry motorhead - but what is your point?
i don't think thar car has force induction - i think mercedes fully developed their engine to even furthur lengths

[motormaniac]

Originally posted by motorhead
nobody seems to be driving their supercar like a supercar so i guess yeah to show off - and by the way every ferrari i have seen on the road so far - they were all travelling below 50km/h on an empty long layer of tarmac(which is the road)

hmmm, that wasn't quite the case with me,

saw a 575 flying

a f355 wheeling

a 360 crusing(at like 120km/h)

and many more

[motormaniac]

Originally posted by motorhead
nobody seems to be driving their supercar like a supercar so i guess yeah to show off - and by the way every ferrari i have seen on the road so far - they were all travelling below 50km/h on an empty long layer of tarmac(which is the road)

i never see ferraris going that slow

[Kudosdude]

Motorhead = This car HAS forced induction - Why to you think it is called bi-turbo?

[motorhead]

Originally posted by Kudosdude
Motorhead = This car HAS forced induction - Why to you think it is called bi-turbo?
oh kudos - you were talking about the bi turbo - i thought you were refering to the brabus 7.3(the pic i posted) - oh sorry then - my mistake

[motorhead]

Originally posted by motormaniac
hmmm, that wasn't quite the case with me,

saw a 575 flying

a f355 wheeling

a 360 crusing(at like 120km/h)

and many more
AHEM - maniac what do you mean by 355 wheeling and 360 at 120(isn't that slow for a FERRARI - real slow i think - my mum goes at 140 with her soluna and she calls that cruising - and 575 with wheels off the groud - i don't think so - please be more specific - thanks

[Kudosdude]

do you guys know the consequences of using a small engine over a big one - ok lets take mercedes benz. they love using huge engines and with tubos or supercharges for that added power

*Shrug*

Never mind - I think we may all be getting confused ;)

Perhaps we should mention the car we are commenting on :D

[motorhead]

Originally posted by Kudosdude
*Shrug*

Never mind - I think we may all be getting confused ;)

Perhaps we should mention the car we are commenting on :D yeah - drop the subject ok

[motormaniac]

Originally posted by motorhead
AHEM - maniac what do you mean by 355 wheeling and 360 at 120(isn't that slow for a FERRARI - real slow i think - my mum goes at 140 with her soluna and she calls that cruising - and 575 with wheels off the groud - i don't think so - please be more specific - thanks

ERM...

i was exggatering

[motorhead]

Originally posted by motormaniac
ERM...

i was exggatering
ok i got worried for a while

[motormaniac]

Originally posted by motorhead
ok i got worried for a while

WAT?

worried

i would be happy to see that happen

[guyt_x]

hahaha

[motorhead]

hahahahhah - NOT

[motormaniac]

Originally posted by motorhead
hahahahhah - NOT

motorhead, can u post something useful or at least funny

[motorhead]

no why is this guyt x laughing

[guyt_x]

at his comment i thought it was funny

***************************************
WAT?

worried

i would be happy to see that happen
***************************************

[motorhead]

my goodness - ok allright

[motormaniac]

Originally posted by motorhead
my goodness - ok allright

....:rolleyes:

[guyt_x]

and you smell


guyt_x runs away....

[motorhead]

hahahaha

[motormaniac]

Originally posted by guyt_x
and you smell


guyt_x runs away....

who ya referring too

[motorhead]

himself i think - ok not really

[Touran]

awesome

[motorhead]

Originally posted by Touran
awesome yes we all know that already!!!

[Touran]

Brabus rules the world (after Volkswagen)

[kinan.f]

Originally posted by Touran
Brabus rules the world (after Volkswagen)
Lambo is the throne holder to me....:D

[motorhead]

i think hamann and alpina are much better tuners

[guyt_x]

I really hope they stop playing with crappy automatic's(mercedes)

[motormaniac]

Originally posted by kinan.f
Lambo is the throne holder to me....:D

oh hell yeah

[motorhead]

Originally posted by guyt_x
I really hope they stop playing with crappy automatic's(mercedes) yeah - the automatics really take away the driver involvement - but then again its for cruising and it does it pretty well i have to admit

[guyt_x]

then dont by a 8 litre super charged car to cruise in. take the train.

or get a station wagon.


actually hold on people do we really think we are going tto change the way a whole nation makes cars..... no we arnt.

so rather let them be silly and build big slow non handling cars that most other countries build with half the engine size twice the power and it can turn left and right.

[motorhead]

Originally posted by guyt_x
then dont by a 8 litre super charged car to cruise in. take the train.

or get a station wagon.


actually hold on people do we really think we are going tto change the way a whole nation makes cars..... no we arnt.

so rather let them be silly and build big slow non handling cars that most other countries build with half the engine size twice the power and it can turn left and right. the brabus 7.3 i posted had a bastard ****in 1400HP man and its really good engine and even if you take out the turbo youre gonna get like 700HP - isn that good

[guyt_x]

rather stay 6.o litre or under

[motorhead]

Originally posted by guyt_x
rather stay 6.o litre or under so what are you telling me - you can get 1400HP with a 2litre engine is it - thats what you are trying to say - i know GM did 1000HP with 2litres - don't know what the **** they did - but come on man

[guyt_x]

the bmw F1 engine puts out 915hp from a 3 litre engine.

hmmm think a skyline 2.7 litre put out 1400hp but thats with twin turbo's and twin nitro's

[motormaniac]

hmmm, some strange company from brazil did it

[motorhead]

Originally posted by motormaniac
hmmm, some strange company from brazil did it and what is it?

[guyt_x]

I remeber the skyline was yellow and nicknamed somethin like "the yellow lemon monster" or some crap dont know

but was fricking fast was about 3 years ago I think had huge turbo's plus twin nitro's that ran automatically at a certain rev range or something, and the injecters where so big they needed to put in the boot.

if memory serves it did 0-100kph in 3.0secs(I think might be less)
and top end run of 410kph but that was done when they took the car over to the USA and did that on the salt flats I think.

oh well searched for that article but can find anything.

maybe you crazy's know something about it.

[motorhead]

Originally posted by guyt_x
I remeber the skyline was yellow and nicknamed somethin like "the yellow lemon monster" or some crap dont know

but was fricking fast was about 3 years ago I think had huge turbo's plus twin nitro's that ran automatically at a certain rev range or something, and the injecters where so big they needed to put in the boot.

if memory serves it did 0-100kph in 3.0secs(I think might be less)
and top end run of 410kph but that was done when they took the car over to the USA and did that on the salt flats I think.

oh well searched for that article but can find anything.

maybe you crazy's know something about it. i know of 1000++ horsepower skylines but i do not know any skyline which can go 400++KM/h!!! man this will be the ultimate then man. I know an r33 with 2 f14 fuel tanks under the car and it had its turbos at full boost and it was 750hp and it was quick and looked great!!

[motormaniac]

wat's that car?

[motorhead]

Originally posted by motormaniac
wat's that car? nissan skyline r33 GTR

[motormaniac]

i know....who made the mods

[guyt_x]

hmmm ?

[motorhead]

Originally posted by motormaniac
i know....who made the mods then why you asking what car it was???

[guyt_x]

i know..... who made the mods ???????

[motorhead]

Originally posted by guyt_x
i know..... who made the mods ??????? think its NISMO

[guyt_x]

guyt_x searches

[motorhead]

Originally posted by guyt_x
guyt_x searches yep

[blabla]

thrpw that renntech and kleemans away look at this
So where's the specs?

[SPN:DOC]

there is a 1200hp skyline R33 GT-R tuned by Top Secret. People im not kidding I was I skyline nut couple years ago. However I think it would be possible to achieve even more then 1200hp in a Porsche, the reason ppl don’t do it $$$$.