View Full Version : UCP Awards (2007) - Most Underrated Member [Voting]
Rockefella
02-22-2008, 02:01 PM
Who do you feel doesn't get the respect they deserve?
faksta
02-22-2008, 02:30 PM
Well, I think every of these three guys have a strong respect here...
Matra et Alpine
02-22-2008, 02:57 PM
how about a "none of the above" option ?
Rockefella
02-22-2008, 05:05 PM
how about a "none of the above" option ?
You had a chance to nominate someone who would be listed under 'none of the above'. You made your bed, now sleep in it. ;)
Ferrer
02-23-2008, 04:20 AM
how about a "none of the above" option ?
Don't vote?
Matra et Alpine
02-23-2008, 04:40 AM
Don't vote?
Htere's a difference between not voting and recording unwillingness to vote for the candidates offered. British politics is full of "we have 60% of the vote" BS from politicians, when in reality they received 60% of the people polled and only 30% of people actually voted. So the only got 18% of the public :) Most voting reform groups seek to have a "none of the above" on all polls :D
Anyway, ROckey's slapped my wrists and I'm a naughty boy for not having proposed anyone else :(
NSXType-R
02-25-2008, 04:06 PM
I love that there is a three way tie.
Rockefella
02-25-2008, 04:19 PM
It's fitting that the three candidates who are underrated fail to receive an individual award. This way you guys can stay underrated. :p
zeppelin
02-27-2008, 10:02 PM
yeah i guess some sort of fight to the death is in order. that's usually how these sorts of things are settled, right?
Rockefella
02-28-2008, 12:25 AM
I honestly don't have any idea how to settle a 3-way poll that goes tied 3 ways. It's not like I can do a run-off because it'd be identical to this exact thread.
henk4
02-28-2008, 02:15 AM
I honestly don't have any idea how to settle a 3-way poll that goes tied 3 ways. It's not like I can do a run-off because it'd be identical to this exact thread.
I could give you the name of the person I would have voted for in case the voting thread would have been anonymous....(in my system votes for people are always cast in anonymity....), but then again if I do, it still becomes obvious whom I voted for;)
Kitdy
02-28-2008, 02:51 AM
I could give you the name of the person I would have voted for in case the voting thread would have been anonymous....(in my system votes for people are always cast in anonymity....), but then again if I do, it still becomes obvious whom I voted for;)
It should remain tied.
As for the public voting, I always sorta found that that was a crock. Voting should be private.
fisetdavid26
02-28-2008, 02:59 AM
It should remain tied.
As for the public voting, I always sorta found that that was a crock. Voting should be private.
I agree with Mr. Paranoid.
Wouter Melissen
02-28-2008, 03:03 AM
I agree with Mr. Paranoid.
Maybe you can edit yourself into the poll with 11 votes. That would be very helpful!
2ndclasscitizen
02-28-2008, 06:28 AM
Nota should win because of the awesome cars he's owned in the past.
zeppelin
03-04-2008, 07:00 PM
Hah, compared to my Neon/SX 2.0/whatever. Yeah right.
Rockefella
03-04-2008, 09:50 PM
Would you guys prefer anonymous voting in the future?
I was under the impression that people wanted public voting, but that may be from when I ran the photo competitions.
Falcon500
04-26-2008, 04:54 AM
It should remain tied.
As for the public voting, I always sorta found that that was a crock. Voting should be private.
I actually votethis guy his contribution is asking queastions and wanting more and more detial which is a worthy course of action and stimulates a large majority of the actual intresting threads in this forum.