Auto Art Bugatti Veyron 1:18 diecast

[diecast_junkie]

Is it safe to assume now that Auto Art will not deliver on the proposed Bugattin Veyron that we have been waiting for? :mad:

[QuattroMan]

Is it safe to assume now that Auto Art will not deliver on the proposed Bugattin Veyron that we have been waiting for? :mad:


Safe or not safe! I am getting tired of waiting I want this car to hit streets.....

[cuntukimushroom]

me too the SLR has just hit the UK roads

[QuattroMan]

me too the SLR has just hit the UK roads


I see you like SLR you talk about it allot why do you like this car so much and I am not trying to say the this bad ok :D

[RedWingsFanG]

A bit offtopic, but does anyone know when the new Ferrari 430 Monza in 1:18 will be released by Mattel?

[QuattroMan]

A bit offtopic, but does anyone know when the new Ferrari 430 Monza in 1:18 will be released by Mattel?


go to www.Mattel.com i think :D :confused:

[Coventrysucks]

Ah, yes, but...

In 1999 Mercedes Benz unveiled the "Vision SLR" and said that the car would be in build by 2003, which it was.

They said it would have a 550bhp engine, do 0-60 in 4.1 seconds and do 199mph.

It has 626bhp, does 0-60 in 3.8 seconds and 208mph.

Above and beyond.

In 2000 Bugatti unveiled the Veyron 16/4 Concept and said it would be built by 2003, which it wasn't.

They said it would have 1001bhp and do 250mph.

It still isn't being built, so it is going to be at least 2 years late. The "standard" car won't be able to do 250mph, for that you apparently need some tacky wings and special tyres.

If they do make the 1:18 model, it'll probably be better than the actual car.

[cuntukimushroom]

I see you like SLR you talk about it allot why do you like this car so much and I am not trying to say the this bad ok :D
well its a stunning car i absolutly love that car cos when i was at the NEC motor show i had a VIP and a membership pass i got to sit in it i was really excited my head nearly pooped off :) this car makes my head spin likw whoah!

[cuntukimushroom]

right on and i dont think itll be street legal probolly for track days

[McLareN]

well its a stunning car i absolutly love that car cos when i was at the NEC motor show i had a VIP and a membership pass i got to sit in it i was really excited my head nearly pooped off :) this car makes my head spin likw whoah!

Imo the SLR Mclaren is one of the most spectacular and magnificent cars of all time, its my favority car :D.
I know what Cuntukimushroom feels, i have seen one in the Lisbon Motorshow but i didn't sit in it :(, anyways,imo the SLR is beautiful in every perspective, i love the car :).

[QuattroMan]

Wel you shouldn't be, because the Veyron will never 'hit the streets'.

Why is that? I have not seen any thing any where the reasons why they are having problems to get this on production????

[illusionest]

lol i got to sit in a SLR at my car show
took like 30 pics
o crap, going off topic here...........

[McLareN]

Why is that? I have not seen any thing any where the reasons why they are having problems to get this on production????

I've read on a magazine that Bugatti wants to make the Veyron reach 450 kph (i think), and for that Bugatti would have to change very much the Veyrons shape for a greater aerodynamic,
and Volkswagen is tired of wasting time and money with Bugatti so its very possible that it will never hit the streets.

[jcp123]

so THATs what the veyron is...interesting

[PerfAdv]

The horsepower wars have manufacturers dosing huge portions of juice into their machines, only to turn around and put all kinds of electronic devices to make these cars controllable. Bugatti, wanting to live up to their revered name and be the first to produce more than 1000 hp, are now suffering from a classic case of, biting off more than you can chew.

[islero]

Exactly. Bugatti Veyron, one of the most pointless automobiles to be considered for production. I dont care if it adds 10 mph to the maximum top speed debate. It does so only by using 350 bhp more than the Mclaren f1, and by using four wheel drive, and "special tyres" and derestricted limiter. Now tell me, which car is more intelligent?

[RS6]

Well the Veyron is more intelligent because it is a new car with a lot of computing power. The F1 is a car from over 10 years ago and has no driver aids and little computing power compared.

The Veyron is a pointless car. It has 1001 bhp but to get that figure it has a W16 8 litre engine with 4 turbochargers. The car will handle like a dog, because it weighs nearly 2 tonnes. That is ok in a GT but in a Hypercar it isn't. The car will also drink fuel like george best drinks alcohol and the engine could be unreliable because of its power. They also say that it is supposed to be a luxury car, but why does a luxury car need 8 litres of W16 and 1001 bhp. I don't care if the car can do 250 mph+ and I don't care if it can reach 60 mph in less than 3 seconds and reach 186 mph in 14 seconds. Why do you need to be that fast? In my eyes, the best top speed for a supercar is 200-210 mph. Any more than that is not nessessary. The F1 will always be a better car than the Veyron no matter what because it is a purist supercar and that is how it should be.

[QuattroMan]

will guys thank you for your intelligent answers it dose make since..thank you but I wish Bugatti comes out whit at list 500-600 hp it dose not have to be 1001hp.....G! oh willllllll!

[danno]

so, if autoart isnt making one, will bburago, maisto, or hotwheels make one??

[FordGT]

Sorry for the late reply, but go to www.project118.com and go to forums, and then to Press Room, there you will find new pics of the Veyron in 1:18 by AUTOart.

[RedWingsFanG]

Thx for the info.

You can say what you want, but the model looks nice.

[eclipse360]

All the info here:
(Buggati Veyron, Ferrari F430 1/18... Even a CGT from AA)

http://www.grandprixlegends.com/DieCastSite//D%5FComingSoon%5FI%5FRoadCars%28DieCast%29/Road+Cars/D%5FComingSoon%5FItems%28DieCast%29/Items/

[tmnt_ppn]

lets say it do goes into production, how much do you think it will cost?? at least a fortune...

[tmnt_ppn]

Well the Veyron is more intelligent because it is a new car with a lot of computing power. The F1 is a car from over 10 years ago and has no driver aids and little computing power compared.

The Veyron is a pointless car. It has 1001 bhp but to get that figure it has a W16 8 litre engine with 4 turbochargers. The car will handle like a dog, because it weighs nearly 2 tonnes. That is ok in a GT but in a Hypercar it isn't. The car will also drink fuel like george best drinks alcohol and the engine could be unreliable because of its power. They also say that it is supposed to be a luxury car, but why does a luxury car need 8 litres of W16 and 1001 bhp. I don't care if the car can do 250 mph+ and I don't care if it can reach 60 mph in less than 3 seconds and reach 186 mph in 14 seconds. Why do you need to be that fast? In my eyes, the best top speed for a supercar is 200-210 mph. Any more than that is not nessessary. The F1 will always be a better car than the Veyron no matter what because it is a purist supercar and that is how it should be.
you're right. i think it meant only to make records, not as a real supercars. i wonder how it will turn with that kind of weight at 160 mph... :rolleyes:

[jyi1693]

Well,the Veyron is on sale and even was on sale since April 2004.Unfortunately nobody wanted to buy it as it costs over 800,000 sterling pounds!!!Bugatti made 50 of them but none were sold.Now Bugatti is planning of making another carwhich is powered by a V8 and will be a four seater (out by 2008)!and about the die cast models by Auto Art,i have 3-BMW M3 CSL,Lambo Gallardo,Mazda RX-8..waiting for the veyron