PDA

View Full Version : Please Explain



Luciferous
11-23-2004, 04:21 AM
As the Pauline Hanson quote suggest, I'm in need of someone explaining a bit of a saga to me.
As a lot of you know (and loathe) the 427 Monaros won 1st and 2nd place in Bathurst a bit back, but I was thinking about it and I was wondering about something, and hoped you guys can clear some issues up for me.

For a car to enter Bathurst it must have a roadgoing equivalent, as is my understanding, and the 427 Monaros obviously did not, which was not helped by the fact most of the stats about it were classed under 'unknown'. But (correct me if I'm wrong with my timeline) if I'm right, this'd be near the time the 427C was in homogulation for the market.
So assuming I'm right so far, could the 427 Monaro's win be a publicity stunt for the 427C road cars? It works if you think about it (and once again assume my timeline is right), if the 427C actually ran to schedule (which it didn't) and it ran thinly disguised Monaros in Bathurst on to win, it would be the perfect publicity for when the car came out for the road. This also shows where the 427 Monaro's had a lot of 'unknown' stats and stuff, as did the 427C.
Also, when you take into account how the 427C program ran over schedule (and eventually died) because of rich bastard customers who always wanted things their way, the timeline is stretched near the point of fitting (in my vague recollections). Now, you can say that 'Well the 437C was a HSV product and so why wasn't it put under a HSV flag?' Wrong, the 427C was developed in conjunction with HRT and so Holden had a lot more to do with the bodyshell after it left the Elizabeth plant.

So in my conspiracy theory for the week, could Holden have convinced the race officials to let the 427 Munro's race because they were garunteed a road version in a very short time after? It makes sense to me, so maybe the benefit of the doubt could be granted in this instance?

Also why the hell would you stick '427' so flamboyantly on the front of both cars when you were so obviously breaking the rules? Think about it and lemme know any points I didn't take into consideration making me wrong.

If any of these points are along the lines of "Because Holdens suck", you're a goddamn idiot, get off my thread.

fpv_gtho
11-23-2004, 04:26 AM
yeah i think youve hit the nail on the head right there. as far as i know, the 427's (which were only prototype racers) were allowed under the pretense there was a road car being developed, and Holden i believe shelled out a fair sum of money to PROCAR to allow it. PROCAR's now dead and the 24hr race was called off this year from a lack of sponsorship i think it was, and i think GRM gave up on the Monaro's so i suppose its not such an issue anymore. Now HSV has their attention payed to the GTS-R which they outwright said, "NO ROAD GOING VERSION IS GOING TO BE MADE"

Blue Supra
11-23-2004, 04:30 AM
which honestly sucks cause it looks like such a nice car:p

fpv_gtho
11-23-2004, 04:33 AM
yeah its not bad to say the least, it'd be interesting to see what happens to the final product, whether such things as carbon fibre lips are put around the bumpers or anything, the concept looked fairly sedate for a race car

Luciferous
11-23-2004, 04:35 AM
Well thats handy to know, because when I think about it further, its not as if HSV could come out and say "Look it was the stupid customers' fault that the 427C didn't make it into production, because I'm willing to bet that blaming the customers is a Golden No-No in the car industry. Which would also explain why the death of the supercar led to HSV taking all the blame lightly and covering its ass with blanket statements like "We did our numbers and our numbers were wrong". Like hell they were, the numbers were drawn out to be wrong because HSV gave into customer pressure and the project blew out of budget.

Blue Supra
11-23-2004, 04:36 AM
yeh it was pretty much a stripped out GTS with a cage in it wasnt it? with 335kw under the bonnet:D ooo yeh!

Luciferous
11-23-2004, 04:40 AM
yeh it was pretty much a stripped out GTS with a cage in it wasnt it? with 335kw under the bonnet:D ooo yeh!

You're talking about the GTS-R, it is a cert for production, but if you remember back I told you the GTS-R isn't road legal, its a proper race car. So no road going car will be produced, if you get it. HSV would be determined not to have a repeat of the 427C fiasco.

I liked the 427C better myself, looked like a bit of a sleeper, and 420kw speaks for itself.

fpv_gtho
11-23-2004, 04:48 AM
420kw was still just a figure tossed around, any road going one wouldve been lucky to crack 400kw and a race one couldve had up to 480kw

Blue Supra
11-23-2004, 04:51 AM
soooo much power, thats completely useless in real road conditions anyways 400kw+ just cant be used to its full potential on the road.

fpv_gtho
11-23-2004, 04:54 AM
yeah, and it'd probably on the race version go without traction control and ABS, so you gotta wonder would they put them on the road car? with so much power, its kinda a death trap NOT doing it.......

then of course theres the gearing, they'd be made to top out around 300

Luciferous
11-23-2004, 04:56 AM
Yes sirry, its all so politically incorrect and thats why I loved her....

fpv_gtho
11-23-2004, 05:00 AM
uhh.....what?

Luciferous
11-23-2004, 05:14 AM
I was referring to the 427C being a supercar but still having a whole lot of muscle car characteristics

Blue Supra
11-23-2004, 05:23 AM
how so? it was a prototype...

Luciferous
11-23-2004, 05:45 AM
A prototype that was a dead cert for production. It was supercar performance in a muscle car body, uniquely Australian

SlickHolden
11-23-2004, 11:20 AM
They say in the U.S that no car can be faster then the Vette it's a GM law thats not on paper. What's to say the death of the 427 didnt come from high above???

fpv_gtho
11-23-2004, 06:43 PM
well the new C6 Z06 is going to be like 500hp/370kw, and like a week before they cancelled the 427C they were saying the production version was going to be about 350kw......

but then again slick, HSV were responsible for it 427C and they dont have the relationship with Holden/GM like Ford and FPV do. HSV used to be completely owned by TWR

Blue Supra
11-23-2004, 10:00 PM
They say in the U.S that no car can be faster then the Vette it's a GM law thats not on paper. What's to say the death of the 427 didnt come from high above???

Good conspiracy theory but i dont think its accurate... i think they just stuffed it up.., plain and simple:p

fpv_gtho
11-23-2004, 11:28 PM
they wanted about 40 track cars to 10 road cars, they got it the wrong way around which blew out the development budget, that was basically it

charged
11-23-2004, 11:34 PM
I think hsv want the gts-r to be a one make series for people who by the car,and theres also talk about a one make series in Malaysia

fpv_gtho
11-23-2004, 11:37 PM
yeah that seems to be the deal, although what media coverage it'll get i dont know. i wouldnt see the point in racing a $150-$200K HSV with no media coverage when a $60K BRute will get more

charged
11-23-2004, 11:58 PM
Probably as asuppourt race for the v8 supercars like the elise series,but instead of leasing it you buy it first

Blue Supra
11-24-2004, 12:01 AM
sounds sweet to me... we could enter a UCP car... Wouter got any spare change???:D

fpv_gtho
11-24-2004, 12:05 AM
yeah what would the livery be, the colours of the forum pages? :p

Blue Supra
11-24-2004, 12:43 AM
yeh with a big pic of a mini on the bonnet:D

fpv_gtho
11-24-2004, 01:43 AM
i tink i'd rather this other pic that i saw on a new mini once :p

but yeah you know how the car in the UCP banner is usually different, i think ive even seen it as a Mini a fair few times :p

Luciferous
11-24-2004, 07:26 AM
they wanted about 40 track cars to 10 road cars, they got it the wrong way around which blew out the development budget, that was basically it

The word about the 427C was that the people who put down deposits demanded track time with the car, and as I would naturally imagine these people would have some sway on HSV, the company bowed to pressure and costs blew out because of it, HSV got cold feet and killed the project before it became a $300,000 car that didn't have the credentials of a $300,000 car. If you remember around 200k was the target price bracket and for that performance, it would look like a very tasty proposition indeed, which would make customers less inclined to badge-snobbery. However, if HSV had gone and made it $300,000 like they said they should have, then the car would be up against some very stiff competition with no real sort of credentials (as in a Holden up against a Porsche?). So that left HSV with the option of killing the project or making a 'loss leader', if you will. We all know the choice HSV made.

SlickHolden
11-24-2004, 07:31 AM
well the new C6 Z06 is going to be like 500hp/370kw, and like a week before they cancelled the 427C they were saying the production version was going to be about 350kw......

but then again slick, HSV were responsible for it 427C and they dont have the relationship with Holden/GM like Ford and FPV do. HSV used to be completely owned by TWR
Does Skaife own HSV now?

Luciferous
11-24-2004, 07:46 AM
No he owns HRT I think. I have no idea who owns HSV...

SlickHolden
11-24-2004, 11:05 AM
Same with me HSV is a msytery, But i only know one thing, They didnt want Holden to own it cause they new GM would take it, Rumour was Holden did something that almost got GM to take ownership of it, But Holden and HSV havent said a word?
I sound like a tosser cause i cant think or remember what it was just little parts.

Blue Supra
11-24-2004, 07:50 PM
nah you dont, it happens to me all the time...:rolleyes:
as far as i can find out... TVR own HSV:eek:
http://www.fordforums.com/t-7010.html

2ndclasscitizen
11-24-2004, 09:31 PM
its a pity about the 427C A lot of the people who put down depsoits have said since that they wouldnt have minded paying more. Plus HSV didnt want to make more than 50 when there was 86 deposits. If they made 100 it woulda cost $200000. A carpoint news article Holden has said if HSV comes on the market, they'll buy it, but it didnt say who the current owner is since TWR went under

Blue Supra
11-24-2004, 09:35 PM
screw $200000 on a holden...
you could buy a pretty nice supercar with 200k:)
OR A HOUSE!!!

2ndclasscitizen
11-24-2004, 09:36 PM
the sort of person who spends $200000 on a holden probably has several $200000 houses and a $2million house

Blue Supra
11-24-2004, 09:39 PM
the person who spends 200k on a holden is an idiot:p regardless of how much money they have:p

SlickHolden
11-24-2004, 10:56 PM
I rekon anyone that spends 200k on a car is a idiot:p No offence to the ones that have but:p

Blue Supra
11-24-2004, 11:16 PM
i dont think anyone on UCP has spent 200k on a car slick so i think youre pretty safe...:D

SlickHolden
11-24-2004, 11:20 PM
<----- He breaths easy:D
I would spend $120,000 but most on upgrades:D

Luciferous
11-24-2004, 11:30 PM
screw $200000 on a holden...
you could buy a pretty nice supercar with 200k:)
OR A HOUSE!!!

This may sound sad, but you can't. You can get a RS6 for 220k, a new M5 for around abouts 220k (Thats what they reckon anyway), a 6 series coupe will set you back 203k, an XKR costs 209k, a Maser GT kicks in at 209k, a 911 Carrera (not the turbo) gets in at 195k.
The closest competitor for the 427C would probably be the Noble GTO-3R at 195k

Blue Supra
11-24-2004, 11:33 PM
well you could get an apartment at least:p

Luciferous
11-24-2004, 11:43 PM
Yeah you could, but I'd get the 427C. A lot of people don't realise how much some cars cost, like a 911 Turbo is 300+k

SlickHolden
11-24-2004, 11:56 PM
NSX is $280,000 ???

Luciferous
11-25-2004, 12:04 AM
245k, with an extra 10g's if you want a targa top

SlickHolden
11-25-2004, 12:09 AM
Seen on 5th gear a chic host had a Golf 99 model maybe, They fitted a NOS bottle to it and it almost beat the NSX :p 70% almost got it

Luciferous
11-25-2004, 12:17 AM
The NSX only puts out 206kw, it may have been classed as a supercar, but it still had to pay attention to Japan's power restriction laws...

SlickHolden
11-25-2004, 12:19 AM
I think as they got above 120kph the NSX had the legs on the golf.

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 01:47 AM
No he owns HRT I think. I have no idea who owns HSV...


i wouldnt be surprised if its simply his name on the contract but Holdens money.....


As for HSV, in 1988 it was 75/25 between TWR and Holden, then tom walkinshaw increased his sharehold to the full 100% i guess somewhere through the 90's, but none of that contributed to the companies failure......damned arrows F1 team

Luciferous
11-25-2004, 02:00 AM
Yeah Skaife's just a figurehead basically

Yeah damn that team, TWR were cool they built the XJ220, I give them heaps of respect for that...

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 02:04 AM
yeah i guess it woulda been through them Ian Callum found his way from HSV to Jag....

but even still, just being a figurehead he must have a lot more pressure put on him as it certainly made him suffer mid-last year

Luciferous
11-25-2004, 02:13 AM
Was Ian Callum the one who designed the new generation of Aston Martins?

Well it certainly showed, I think the pressures of trying to run the team is the last thing he needs right now. It would be extremely frustrating to be in Skaifey's shoes right now...

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 02:18 AM
well ive been told he employed a couple of others to do some of the more business associated jobs and such so that all he had to worry about was the lap times, but hes getting past his prime, hes gotta take everything he can get now otherwise he'll die back and be a B class driver with the occasional high point. i hate to say it, but i guess Brad Jones and Seton arent too far away from that either

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 02:19 AM
i think he couldve been involved with Aston Martin, i get them and Jag mixed up a fair bit now.....either way, both part of PAG so the management would have its fair share of shifts

Blue Supra
11-25-2004, 03:58 AM
i mustve mistyped...:o sorry guys...

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 04:10 AM
where?????

Luciferous
11-25-2004, 04:42 AM
By saying that TVR own HSV, instead of TWR...

Bit of a TVR fanboy are we Bluey? Or should I call you matek?

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 04:48 AM
well its a simple mistake really

Luciferous
11-25-2004, 04:51 AM
I was just referring to the dumbass comments made by matek on the Best Cars thread...

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 04:57 AM
yeah well i highly doubt he'll be back to make a comeback

Luciferous
11-25-2004, 05:07 AM
Yeah he last posted on the 'drawing cars' thread, once again ranting on about TVR.....

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 05:17 AM
well someones being a bit of a fanboy, arent we :p

he'll be bak eventually, they always are :p gotta see the aftermath

Luciferous
11-25-2004, 05:19 AM
Well I can say I'm looking forward to it.

PS Noice avatar there Bluey

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 05:28 AM
well it could be fun, he could say something even worse :p

i reckon i woulda had fun this time had you guys not jumped at him first :p

Blue Supra
11-25-2004, 05:40 AM
PS Noice avatar there Bluey

Cheers man, you should put one up;)

Luciferous
11-25-2004, 06:02 AM
Yeah I should put one up I dunno what of, if I was gonna make a proper one, then I'd have to scan shit in, make it a GIF, it's all so complicated...

Blue Supra
11-25-2004, 06:04 AM
go to
www.avatarity.com
thats where i got this little chap:D

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 03:58 PM
do it the lazy way like i did......post any pics you want in it and ask if anyone can wack 'em together....

unless you want an animation like Bluey's, which yeah will be on his link :p

Blue Supra
11-25-2004, 09:42 PM
i got someone to make my old supra one... maybe i should try using that PS thingy to make one myself...:rolleyes:

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 10:01 PM
whats the PS thing?

Blue Supra
11-25-2004, 10:02 PM
Photo Shop...;)

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 10:12 PM
shoulda thought.....i was initially thinking of publisher for some reason :p

Blue Supra
11-25-2004, 10:14 PM
Publisher Suite maybe?

fpv_gtho
11-25-2004, 10:19 PM
nah....just the only thing i could think of with a P and S was publisher...but photoshop is the obvious one :p

Blue Supra
11-26-2004, 12:01 AM
well it does have a P and an S in it:D

fpv_gtho
11-26-2004, 01:46 AM
yeh that it does.....i suppose i'll know for next time :p

Luciferous
11-26-2004, 06:24 AM
My problem is I know Photoshop like the back of my hand, but my computer is slow its way too frustrating to do anything with it. That and PS can't make animations...

fpv_gtho
11-26-2004, 07:22 PM
the closest program i got to Photoshop is MS Paint, so i guess thats why i havent tried any yet, although my brothers done heaps of 2 door BA GT's

SlickHolden
11-27-2004, 01:45 AM
I would love to make cars and color them but i'll be honest, I'm shit drawing and painting:p
But i got like 10 ideas in my head for every car to change to the way i like it:(

fpv_gtho
11-27-2004, 02:03 AM
well i think with the right programming, you dont need a skilled hand, just gotta click in the right places and know the right functions

Luciferous
11-28-2004, 07:27 AM
The thing about PS is that its so in depth, theres like 20 ways of doing one thing, so its all down to your style. I like to do everything manually and not rely on effects to do all hard work.

SlickHolden
11-28-2004, 03:23 PM
Cause i can't draw, When i'm bored i get my book out and make cars,
Or sometimes i make a car company, I got like 10 books filled with cars:p

Got a name for it and all DMC :D

Blue Supra
11-28-2004, 04:19 PM
yeh i used to draw a fair bit, i have a mate who back in the day would just draw... he could draw the most lifelike VR - VS Clubsports SS's modified or stock, id just sit there and watch him do it. it was amazing:)

SlickHolden
11-28-2004, 04:26 PM
I must have been in the dunny when god gave skills like that out, Well i might have been having a number 2 when he was giving most things out :p

Blue Supra
11-28-2004, 04:35 PM
LMAO,
*bluey opens slicks head, finds letter from God... IOU one Brain..."
:p

SlickHolden
11-28-2004, 04:53 PM
And to working arm's :p

Blue Supra
11-28-2004, 04:55 PM
whats wrong with your arms?

SlickHolden
11-28-2004, 05:49 PM
They bent in the middle to much so straight out it's short which isnt good for a straight punch:(
But out to the side they are huge like 190cm left to right and i'm only about 179-181cm tall.

Blue Supra
11-28-2004, 06:13 PM
yeh my arm span is pretty similar to my height... and thats sayin something.:D

fpv_gtho
11-28-2004, 11:21 PM
They bent in the middle to much so straight out it's short which isnt good for a straight punch:(
But out to the side they are huge like 190cm left to right and i'm only about 179-181cm tall.

that sounds like my elbows, the almost bend backwards

Luciferous
11-29-2004, 02:51 AM
Well luckily I must have been first in line when God gave out fine motor skills. Problem is that now I got a dodgy back (no I'm not Italian) from always hunching over a desk as a kid.

fpv_gtho
11-29-2004, 03:06 AM
i think everyone falls victim to a bad back eventually...just a read pity i guess when you get guys in their mid 20's who are like that, one of my brothers friends is like that and its almost turned his life upside down

Luciferous
11-29-2004, 03:25 AM
The problem is that your spine stops growing when your 15 I think, so if you don't pay attention and straighten your back while you can you're screwed.

fpv_gtho
11-29-2004, 03:27 AM
Well im continually told by my mum to keep straightening my back, apparently its some gene i got off my dad that i hunch my shoulders forward

Luciferous
11-29-2004, 03:47 AM
Well it can't be too bad. I did it too much, and now my chest is slighty convex rather than being concave. Now you know why they say to straighten your shoulders.

fpv_gtho
11-29-2004, 03:52 AM
i can see why she's telling me to do it, i look a good 2 inches taller when i do it, its just not comfortable and i hardly ever do it......so its a bit annoying unless i EVERYDAY make a point of doing it and crap like that

Luciferous
11-29-2004, 03:56 AM
I used to make myself try and seem smaller because I was usually a bit taller than everyone else, so it was easier to bring myself 'back down' to eye level than stand up straight.

fpv_gtho
11-29-2004, 03:59 AM
i think ive had that problem before, i was always taller than everyone so rather than feel uncomfortable by looking down on them, i'd crouch down abit and hunch a bit, but now everyones growing up to my level so im staring at the ground alot for no good reason

Luciferous
11-29-2004, 04:04 AM
Yeah you get that. In my case, everyone got taller but I kept going as well...

fpv_gtho
11-29-2004, 04:09 AM
I dont think i have that much growing left anyway, i know my twin brothers over 6 foot already, but im still about 5'9

Luciferous
11-29-2004, 04:14 AM
You will most probably get to over 6'. I kept growing all the way till I was about 18.

fpv_gtho
11-29-2004, 04:16 AM
Well im kinda happy with how tall i am now, but at the same time i think being a bit taller would be nice as well..

Luciferous
11-29-2004, 04:18 AM
6' is pretty much the best height. I'm 6'3" and sometimes I get a bit weird because I feel like I'm 'too tall' when with a girl, but it's not like I seek out short women anyway.

charged
11-29-2004, 04:28 AM
Lucky barstard 6,3 im only 5,7 Im not even 6 foot in my wifes highest stelletos :(

fpv_gtho
11-29-2004, 04:29 AM
well i think i'd rather be too tall than too short, i'd hate to be that Anthony Callea, shit hes shorter than Rove :p

Luciferous
11-29-2004, 04:30 AM
Yeah you know your short when you seem tiny next to Andrew G. Look at it this way charged, TV Hosts are always short for some reason, so theres a possible career path...

fpv_gtho
11-29-2004, 04:31 AM
Lucky barstard 6,3 im only 5,7 Im not even 6 foot in my wifes highest stelletos :(


my dad's 5"10 and he "looks" short, although hes still got a bit on me. kinda ironic that my dads uncle towers at around 6 and a half foot and his son, my dads cousin, is even taller..

charged
11-29-2004, 04:31 AM
Yeah I hate it my 9 yr old daughter is up to my shoulder already,she will be patting me on the head as I walk her down the aisle on her wedding day,how so very,very sad :(

Luciferous
11-29-2004, 04:40 AM
Oh well I guess its a self image thing. I don't think being short is necessarily bad or embarrassing, I just occasionally make it that way when someone gets a 'small man' mentality. I used to know some guy who was pretty short for his age, so when he got to the end of high school he got into bodybuilding. It was like he was compensationg for his height rather than accepting it, which only drew more attention to it.

SlickHolden
11-29-2004, 05:44 AM
that sounds like my elbows, the almost bend backwards
:p sorry i ment not enough :o They are bent when straight :o

fpv_gtho
11-29-2004, 09:23 PM
ahh well that makes a huge difference :p

SlickHolden
11-30-2004, 12:51 AM
If i was a sri lankan bowler they be saying baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaall:p

fpv_gtho
11-30-2004, 01:24 AM
uhh.....so what has that got to do with it? :p

im not the biggest cricket fan BTW :p

Luciferous
11-30-2004, 04:42 AM
Taking the piss outta Murali, the Sri Lankan bowler who "cannot bowl properly due to the natural curvature of his arm". I don't see why he's still playing if he can't bowl properly but hey, the ICC are a strange bunch.

fpv_gtho
11-30-2004, 04:45 AM
ohhh....i think i saw something bout him a year or so ago.....was continually accused of "throwing" the ball

Luciferous
11-30-2004, 04:54 AM
He was throwing it. But that's a bit of a big issue in the cricket world. One side says he's a class bowler and should be left alone. The other side says he chucks he ball and shouldn't be allowed to play no matter who he is.

fpv_gtho
11-30-2004, 05:01 AM
i guess its tough considering its all based around a physical attribute that cant really be helped

Luciferous
11-30-2004, 05:11 AM
The way I see it if his arm has always been like that then why is he playing cricket if he can't stick to the rules?

fpv_gtho
11-30-2004, 05:15 AM
thats true, surely he wouldnt have gotten into anything professional with such a thing. do you think such a thing couldve changed over a course of time?

Luciferous
11-30-2004, 05:19 AM
I don't know. He's a fast bowler so he bowls like 5x more than most other bowlers so it might have. But like I said its a really dividing topic in the cricket world and some people get pretty heated about it...

fpv_gtho
11-30-2004, 05:25 AM
i knew there was a reason i never got into cricket :p

SlickHolden
11-30-2004, 06:10 AM
Murali from what i herd had a accident when young and injured his arm, So that really isn't something he was born with, If your born with 4 fingers you wouldn't play AFL or NRL.
But i can't give Murali crap to much, Cause he is a Western Bulldogs Member so i like him:p He comes to games he has become a big fan of AFL.

Luciferous
11-30-2004, 09:15 AM
That's a bit biased ain't it Slick? Besides, maybe he could do something to straighten out his arm, Daniel Chick had a section of his finger surgically removed so he could play footy better....

fpv_gtho
12-01-2004, 12:03 AM
thats just like saying thought that if Mark Skaife done something stupid he should be exempt from it since HRT bring in more crowds, than say DJR

Blue Supra
12-01-2004, 07:18 PM
6' is pretty much the best height. I'm 6'3" and sometimes I get a bit weird because I feel like I'm 'too tall' when with a girl, but it's not like I seek out short women anyway.

try being 6"6 with a girlfriend who's 5"4:p

fpv_gtho
12-01-2004, 07:48 PM
shit 1"2 difference :p

SlickHolden
12-01-2004, 08:28 PM
try being 6"6 with a girlfriend who's 5"4:p
You know thats not that bad at all:p

SlickHolden
12-01-2004, 08:31 PM
That's a bit biased ain't it Slick? Besides, maybe he could do something to straighten out his arm, Daniel Chick had a section of his finger surgically removed so he could play footy better....
No body ever talked about scott wynds missing fingers. And he was a ruckman, And he won the Brownlow in 92 wiht missing fingers,
But i diont say he dont chuck i said i dont wanna give him to much shit cause he is a bulldog member, And i dont see why rules should be changed for one that's not fair:)

Blue Supra
12-01-2004, 08:40 PM
You know thats not that bad at all:p

its funny, i get her to stand on things so i can kiss her without hurting my neck:D

SlickHolden
12-01-2004, 08:53 PM
Bad things come into my mind when i think short girl tall guy:p

My mum makes me bend to give me a kiss but it's not that bad she's about 5.1.
But my auntie is like 4.2 she is bloody small my uncle is 5.7 they look funny :p

Blue Supra
12-01-2004, 09:01 PM
1"5 in diff... :eek: ive seen a 6"9 guy with a 5"0 girl, that looked hella funny:D

fpv_gtho
12-01-2004, 11:14 PM
i think with that much difference i'd be like slick, thinkin bout the wrong thing

SlickHolden
12-02-2004, 12:18 PM
The cartoon pic's i have seen lol:p i might get a ban if i say them here:D

Blue Supra
12-02-2004, 04:26 PM
LOL, yeh you mightnt want to mention that here slick...;)

crisis
12-02-2004, 04:27 PM
HSV got cold feet and killed the project before it became a $300,000 car that didn't have the credentials of a $300,000 car.
Performance wise it "owned" all the other $300,000 cars performance wise. Not bad credentials.

SlickHolden
12-02-2004, 04:33 PM
The HRT 427 would have been V8 supercar street legal:D

Blue Supra
12-02-2004, 04:47 PM
Performance wise it "owned" all the other $300,000 cars performance wise. Not bad credentials.

can you see it fitting into the category though? Porsche.... Ferrari.... Lamboghini.... Holden....

it doesnt take a genius to figure out which one doesnt fit in.

crisis
12-02-2004, 05:02 PM
can you see it fitting into the category though? Porsche.... Ferrari.... Lamboghini.... Holden....

it doesnt take a genius to figure out which one doesnt fit in.
Even better that it can compare with cars built by companies who spend millions on developement to produce ultimate sports cars (in larger more economical production runs) where Holden is a backwater subsidiary of an American multinational commodity provider.

Blue Supra
12-02-2004, 05:11 PM
yeh, it really makes you think hey:rolleys::p

fpv_gtho
12-02-2004, 07:28 PM
if the project successfully got off the ground, it couldve done a world of good for Holden fans, but as Bluey was saying before, theres massive snob appeal for trying to get someone to choose a Monaro over a 911 Turbo

Luciferous
12-03-2004, 03:47 AM
The way to look at it is if its a $300,000 dollar car thats in 911 Turbo country. There are some reputations on the line. I suppose the word I was looking for was more 'cache' than 'credentials'. It sounds a bit dumb, but $200,000 is still relatively accessible for the public (I see enough 7 series around to prove it). $300,000 is a lot more removed, and so thats where the badge snobbery comes in big time.

SlickHolden
12-03-2004, 05:36 PM
In straight line speed it owned it and many cars, They predictied sub 5 easy 0-100 and max speed well above 300Kph, It's going to stop fine with APRacing brakes, And it's tuned V8 style suspension was the only thing that not many knew about, they knew the speed was there but it's handling was it up to match the GT3 ??? Guess we will never know now.

fpv_gtho
12-05-2004, 03:11 AM
its on road behaviour couldve suffered as well, whilst a 911 turbo is still very much hardedged, the 427 wouldve been more ofa match to the GT3 in the fact its a road-race car

Blue Supra
12-05-2004, 05:17 PM
The 427 wouldnt/couldnt have beaten a 911T round a track, sure itd be faster in a straight line but its handling wouldnt have been up to the same level as a Porsche...

fpv_gtho
12-05-2004, 08:20 PM
maybe, maybe not. it had the double wishbone front/5 link rear end straight out of a V8 Supercar, but its 1500kg weight wouldve gone against it for sure.

Luciferous
12-05-2004, 08:57 PM
But it had around 420kw to solve the weight problem, plus the sheer amount of torque the engine would produce. The GT3 only pumps out 280kw, but has a 200 odd kg weight advantage. Add to this the GT3's engine isn't particular tourquey with only 385nm, it'd be an interesting comparison, but my money would be on the Holden. The chassis would have pretty good balance, but it wouldn't have anything on the Porsche, so I guess it would come down to the track. Holden should have sent a prototype to the Nubruring, dammit....

fpv_gtho
12-05-2004, 09:01 PM
both the GT3 and turbo would have their powe band matched to their ratio's so the torque wouldnt be an issue. it seems even on the race track the holdens cant seem to hold as much corner speed as others so that'd be their big downpoint

Matra et Alpine
12-06-2004, 03:19 AM
But it had around 420kw to solve the weight problem, .
Power only beats weight on the straight lines under acceleration.
Under braking and cornering weight is the BIGGEST disadvantage.

charged
12-06-2004, 03:23 AM
Power only beats weight on the straight lines under acceleration.
Under braking and cornering weight is the BIGGEST disadvantage.Depend what track sometimes too much power is a disadvantage,they tend too flair up out of corners,big straights help equal the equation,but that depends on the track

fpv_gtho
12-06-2004, 05:35 AM
I think more power's becoming the enemy of Eastern Creek lately, all the V8 Supercar guys were complaining about a lack of grip to no end and having to "ease" the cars through all the corners. most people said it was like driving in the rain

SlickHolden
12-06-2004, 05:21 PM
Maybe they need to resurface it.

Blue Supra
12-06-2004, 05:26 PM
or broom it before they run, we have guys that run out with brooms and sweep dirt off the track if anyone slides on and gets it on the track. holds us up a bit but makes it safer/easier.

SlickHolden
12-06-2004, 05:29 PM
You got to think that the drags hurts the straight a little, And when they drive around it's like they are on ice skates somethimes.
When the rain come down it looked shinny slippy bad:)

Blue Supra
12-06-2004, 05:32 PM
yeh thats true, when it started raining the people with slicks on their cars didnt run...

SlickHolden
12-06-2004, 05:35 PM
I'll have to say i don't think it's a Holden track:p I don't think it has ever been good for a holden.

Blue Supra
12-06-2004, 05:37 PM
i dont know:confused: i havent seen it and i honestly follow cricket more closely then the V8s:p

SlickHolden
12-06-2004, 05:39 PM
Lets not talk about cricket mate:p
Bloody went to sleep we did felt sorry for the kiwis i think let them have a win:p

Blue Supra
12-06-2004, 05:41 PM
yeh i was sooooo unbeleivably cut when i saw that! 2 bloody balls and we wouldve had em!:mad: lift your games Aussies!

SlickHolden
12-06-2004, 05:44 PM
I think they only played on 2 cyl :(

Blue Supra
12-06-2004, 06:03 PM
lol, you could put it that way:D 2 out of 12 maybe:(

fpv_gtho
12-06-2004, 10:23 PM
Well i think resurfacing is definately on the cards for Eastern Creek, i think it was Barbagallo that for years has suffered the same problems, so when they resurfaced it this year the lap times tumbled about 2-3 seconds, people were overtaking left right and centre it was so good.....

believe it or not, Eastern Creek used to be one of the ones HRT claimed as their "own", before 2003 there was like a whole string of wins to Lowndes, Skaife, Bright and Todd Kelly all in the HRT cars.

SlickHolden
12-06-2004, 11:06 PM
HRT is still strong there i think, But the rest need to catch up.

Maybe they should resurface every 5 years ? all of them:D

fpv_gtho
12-07-2004, 12:04 AM
real strength on that first corner, thats for sure :p

i dont know what sort of a figure each 5 years would be, its been 5 years since they raced at symmons plains and theyve resurfaced about 75% of that...

SlickHolden
12-07-2004, 02:32 AM
I like symonds plains, Before the straight thats a great turn there, The straight is good also big turn at full power:D

charged
12-07-2004, 02:34 AM
Fair bit of passing takes place also

fpv_gtho
12-07-2004, 02:53 AM
well the big straight a Symmons plains is like the big straight on my track from a low speed corner, i got 2 chicanes leading into hairpins so it should be good

i'll have to post it, i think i gotta change the format from bitmap to JPEG

Blue Supra
12-07-2004, 10:12 PM
open paint and save as jpeg:) (if you didnt know already;))

i like to have straights but i love technical footwork parts as well, good to drift through and stuff:)

SlickHolden
12-07-2004, 11:53 PM
I like straight with turn but if you got the balls hold it flat and hang on:D that kind of straight, Like the chase at bathurst that's the best turn in the world:D

fpv_gtho
12-08-2004, 12:06 AM
usually i just open up this program i use for the scanner to switch file types, i didnt know Paint could do it :p

the chase though theyre going in there with the brakes hard on, trying not to lock them up. cameron mclean for the past 2 years has come through there and locked them up and spun

SlickHolden
12-08-2004, 12:09 AM
I remember one year back years ago when brocky drove the mobil VP, He was chating on camera and went flat throught it and you could see his face change, He told them he did it but you could see it, He just had a face lift going throught there:p

fpv_gtho
12-08-2004, 12:45 AM
back then i suppose the braking zones and everything wouldve been different, even between now and last year they can afford to brake later as theyre going a good 10km/h slower

SlickHolden
12-08-2004, 10:36 AM
They said it was more bumpy there this year, Maybe it's time to resurface that part for 2005, Before someone gets hurt on the bumps.

Blue Supra
12-08-2004, 05:22 PM
crashes are always exciting but it never pretty:( hopefully they do resurface it, our track gets resurfaced every 2 years.

fpv_gtho
12-09-2004, 08:12 AM
the chase isnt somewhere you want to be spinning out, theyre hitting the brakes now at 290km/h afterall and i think Cameron McLeans crash this year was cause of the bumps, he managed to hit the brakes sorta mid air so when the car rested back on all 4, it just locked up

Blue Supra
12-09-2004, 05:27 PM
thats not cool, scary enough spinning out at 80kph:eek: 290kph would be change of pants for sure:D

fpv_gtho
12-09-2004, 05:33 PM
imagine how he felt having done it 2 years in a row now, first with Andy Priaulx in the #15 Kmart car and now in the #9 SBR car. this year i think he actually crashed into one of the team dynamik cars doing so

Blue Supra
12-09-2004, 06:54 PM
team dynamik never have a chance anyways so he might as well hit them and do everyone else a favor:D

fpv_gtho
12-09-2004, 07:17 PM
yeah maybe he had his own way of punishing them for that illegal woomera test :p

Blue Supra
12-09-2004, 07:18 PM
what illegal woomera test?

fpv_gtho
12-09-2004, 08:41 PM
did you hear they got caught with the transporter and cars all taped up and stuff on this abandoned airstrip near woomera?

Blue Supra
12-09-2004, 09:22 PM
taped up? i dont understand :confused:

fpv_gtho
12-09-2004, 09:38 PM
they put vinal all over any sponsorships and anything showing that it was the team dynamik cars. so it was basically just a pair of white VY commodore supercars and a big B double transporter, out in the middle of nowhere

Blue Supra
12-09-2004, 09:45 PM
so why is that bad?

fpv_gtho
12-09-2004, 09:57 PM
Illegal testing, AVESCO only allows 6 days of official testing for the V8's and it has to be at a nominated track. So what went wrong there was Team Dynamik didnt tell Avesco they were testing, and they were testing somewher they werent allowed.

they had the most BS excuse for it allthough

Blue Supra
12-09-2004, 09:59 PM
private loan of the cars?:D

how the hell did they get caught all the way out there? did a refugee escape and dob on them?:p

fpv_gtho
12-09-2004, 10:27 PM
maybe :p

wouldnt be surprised if one of the AVESCO guys saw them leaving their place in SA and followed them out there. theyve got video's of it and everything.

they were claiming "they were doing scientific tests for NASA to evaluate a new windscreen design that had serious environmental benefits"

ROFL!

Blue Supra
12-09-2004, 10:28 PM
new windscreen design? and did NASA confirm this?

crisis
12-09-2004, 10:30 PM
they were claiming "they were doing scientific tests for NASA to evaluate a new windscreen design that had serious environmental benefits"

ROFL!
I suppose it doesnt damage the air.

Blue Supra
12-09-2004, 10:33 PM
how do you have an environmentally (such a hard word to type) winscreen? does it break down easily or somethign on impact:D

fpv_gtho
12-09-2004, 11:06 PM
i dont think NASA's said anything about it, it was funny though cause there was this big press release about the appeal for it, and one journo stood up to ask Kees Weel a couple of questions, and of course hes asking him shit like "well if you werent there doing illegal testing, than what were you doing?" and Kees just sat there stuttering before he spat out that excuse

charged
12-09-2004, 11:40 PM
private loan of the cars?:D

how the hell did they get caught all the way out there? did a refugee escape and dob on them?:pI think a ex employee was whistle blower

fpv_gtho
12-10-2004, 01:31 AM
now Team Dynamik have taken it right up to the FIA in France to get their punishment overthrown, kinda pointless you would think

charged
12-10-2004, 02:08 AM
Yeah they should just cop it sweet,they were well and truly caught with their hand in the lollie jar :D

fpv_gtho
12-10-2004, 02:12 AM
i'd really laugh if the FIA just gives them a worse penalty, but i think since its only TD doing the appeal, not TEGA as well like last time which lead from the increase in $104K fine, to them supposedly starting in pitlane, 1 lap down at Adelaide and eastern Creek for the last round this year

Blue Supra
12-12-2004, 07:39 PM
thatd be hilarious, whingin often just makes it worse:D

can they afford a 104k fine, theyre not the most "glamorous" team.

fpv_gtho
12-13-2004, 12:59 AM
i dont know if it'd be coming out of Kees Weel's pocket or out of the team budget, but if i was one of the sponsors, i'd be against it coming from my sponsorship money for instance

Blue Supra
12-13-2004, 06:31 PM
id be pulling my damn sponsorship!

give it to team Kiwi:D

fpv_gtho
12-14-2004, 12:02 AM
i have to wonder if that happened as theyr naming rights have changed from team dynamik to dodo racing