View Full Version : slr mclaren vs cls 55 amg
waht the beautifull car of them
slr mclaren vs cls 55 amg
images of slr...
illusionest
11-27-2004, 03:52 PM
SLR mclaren.
NO comparison
AT ALL
SLR Mclaren all the way man
McLareN
11-27-2004, 04:25 PM
HAHA, SLR all the way :)
Best car ever, imo of course ;)
d-quik
11-27-2004, 04:30 PM
dude, one costs 3 times as much as the other.
illusionest
11-27-2004, 04:41 PM
lol i posted before he posted the CLS
which proves the CLS is not fast enuff as hte SLR
Coventrysucks
11-27-2004, 04:51 PM
dude, one costs 3 times as much as the other.
More like 5 times as much.
jcp123
11-27-2004, 05:37 PM
I don't think either of them are pretty at all. But of those two, the CLS is much less offensive looking to me.
cls looks better, but the slr performs better ....
Slr i guess, dont really like either of them.
my porsche
11-27-2004, 07:43 PM
dude! how do you compare the two? one is a supercar, the other is a sports-luxury car
my porsche
11-27-2004, 07:45 PM
but id get the cls55, my mom might get the cls500, awesome car!!!!
tmnt_ppn
11-28-2004, 12:55 AM
slr no doubt! in which part does the cls is better than slr, beside it price and pessenger capacity??
jcp123
11-28-2004, 01:16 AM
None really, but seeing that price and passenger capacity are very much more important to me than the other categories...plus the fact that the CLS looks slightly better to me than the SLR...and I have a winner.
Course for the money there's tons of other cars I'd rather get.
tmnt_ppn
11-28-2004, 01:32 AM
None really, but seeing that price and passenger capacity are very much more important to me than the other categories...plus the fact that the CLS looks slightly better to me than the SLR...and I have a winner.
Course for the money there's tons of other cars I'd rather get.
well it depends on what you use the car for... i want a high performance car thats why i choose slr.
jcp123
11-28-2004, 01:35 AM
Exactly. Horses for courses. I like my comfort and space, you like performance. There's one for each of us here.
Hell_Unleashed
11-28-2004, 04:16 AM
How can you even say the CLS looks good... eww!
The comparison is completely messed up but for the sake of answering your question... SLR.
jcp123
11-28-2004, 01:06 PM
How can you even say the CLS looks good... eww!
The comparison is completely messed up but for the sake of answering your question... SLR.
Never said that. I said that the CLS looks slightly better to me than the SLR, neither of which appeal to me in the least. I like long hood/short deck as much as the next person, but there's something off with the proportions of the SLR. I think maybe it's trying to put forward rake on that that messes it up. God I hate forward rake.
The SLR for me. I am just a big fan of the powerplant.
Hell_Unleashed
11-28-2004, 08:30 PM
Never said that. I said that the CLS looks slightly better to me than the SLR, neither of which appeal to me in the least. I like long hood/short deck as much as the next person, but there's something off with the proportions of the SLR. I think maybe it's trying to put forward rake on that that messes it up. God I hate forward rake.
My bad.... :) I targetted my previous post at KKO and not you... sorry.
KKO said 'CLS looks better, SLR has better performance'
lithuanianmafia
11-28-2004, 08:59 PM
SLR, no questions asked :)
man 430gt
01-07-2005, 11:57 AM
Your actually telling me 8 PEOPLE ARE TOO DUMB TO READ AND SEE THE CARS :eek: :D Come on I'm pretty sure you ain't blind :eek: :D
6'bore
01-07-2005, 12:13 PM
not a very good comparo but i'd have the slr everytime. amazing car. In black though
Lagonda
01-07-2005, 01:50 PM
Stupid comparison. Like 90% of the comparisons in this part of the forums. 'nuff said.
andy.muc
01-08-2005, 05:22 AM
Stupid comparison. Like 90% of the comparisons in this part of the forums. 'nuff said.
Nah.. that's not true. I agree this is one more stupid comparo but overall there may be about 20% bad comparos in here.
Most people will overthink their next comparo when most members criticised their last.
SLR for me. :D
Spastik_Roach
01-08-2005, 05:41 AM
He simply asked which one did you think was more beautiful.
Get over it.
Spastik_Roach
01-08-2005, 05:41 AM
I personally say the SLR is best, but I don't particulary love either of em.
andy.muc
01-08-2005, 05:47 AM
He simply asked which one did you think was more beautiful.
Get over it.
Uh... you're right! My bad... then i'd say the CLS is more beautiful of course.
Lagonda
01-08-2005, 03:37 PM
Nah.. that's not true. I agree this is one more stupid comparo but overall there may be about 20% bad comparos in here.
Most people will overthink their next comparo when most members criticised their last.
SLR for me. :D
This is indeed one of the better ones since he asks about looks but the thing is that most of the threads in here (including this one) are rehashed versions of threads done before. History repeats itself. And a lot of them are really retarded comarisons sometimes.
SL500
01-08-2005, 04:35 PM
what the hell is this comparsion ?!
Mustang
01-08-2005, 04:40 PM
what the hell is this comparsion ?!
haha
how old is this thread :p
and i agree
092326001
01-08-2005, 08:09 PM
the CLS is nothing compared to the SLR
092326001
01-12-2005, 09:28 AM
the cls55 amg cannot be compared to the slr mclaren
the slr mclaren is too good for cls55
Coventrysucks
01-12-2005, 09:38 AM
Echo... echo... echo...
omarsuperman
02-08-2005, 07:28 PM
are u retarted lol
CdocZ
02-08-2005, 07:30 PM
who is retarded? and why?
coventry is right, theres been 3 pages of "slr is better at this" "cls is better at that" "these 2 cant be compared".
Manik
02-08-2005, 07:34 PM
the CLS is no match for the SLR. The SLR beats it in horsepower top speed and 0-60 mph
Cadillac Imaj
02-08-2005, 09:05 PM
Cls is no match to the slr in terms of performance and many other things!
6'bore
02-09-2005, 10:19 AM
Cls is no match to the slr in terms of performance and many other things!
But the slr is no match for the cls in comfort.
andy.muc
02-09-2005, 10:52 AM
But the slr is no match for the cls in comfort.
Hmm i wouldn't even say that. The SLR has a nice interieur as well.
Only not that much space vor passengers...
But that's still not the issue of this thread.
He simply asked which one looks better to you.
That makes this comparo quite alright... :D
forza_autodelta
02-09-2005, 01:30 PM
Some of you will be angry but a peugeot 607 V6 is better than a mercedes and less expensive .peugeot is the leader all over the world for ground liaisons
andy.muc
02-09-2005, 04:03 PM
Some of you will be angry but a peugeot 607 V6 is better than a mercedes and less expensive
A Mercedes? Are you kidding?
And btw. what does that have to do with this thread?
This thread is about the looks and not about performance...
Lagonda
02-09-2005, 04:08 PM
Yet another pointless thread. Surprise.
carlover
02-09-2005, 06:03 PM
Some of you will be angry but a peugeot 607 V6 is better than a mercedes and less expensive .peugeot is the leader all over the world for ground liaisons
Who cares if it's less expensive? This thread is regarding which of the 2 mercedes you think looks better.
andy.muc
02-10-2005, 07:37 AM
Yet another pointless thread. Surprise.
It's not pointless at all. If you don't have an oppinion which of them LOOKS better then just don't post. ;)
Koenigsegg_CC
02-10-2005, 07:54 AM
The CLS because i could never afford an SLR ever. Probably.
forza_autodelta
02-10-2005, 12:05 PM
I am not kidding a 607 is better than mercedes in his category
andy.muc
02-11-2005, 02:17 AM
I am not kidding a 607 is better than mercedes in his category
You sound very subjektive.
607 V6 HDi FAP 205 ab 42.200 €
Hubraum (ccm) 2720
Maximale Leistung (PS) 204
Maximales Drehmoment (Nm) 440
Maximale Geschwindigkeit (km/h) 230
Beschleunigung 0-100 km/h (in Sek.) 8.7
E 270 CDI ab 39.788 €
Hubraum (ccm) 2685
Maximale Leistung (PS) 177
Maximales Drehmoment (Nm) 400
Maximale Geschwindigkeit (km/h) 230
Beschleunigung 0-100 km/h (in Sek.) 9.0
So the Peugeot is slightly better in performance but also more expensive.
It has a higher average fuel consumption (607: 8.4l; E270: 6.7l).
The MB has more space in the trunk (607: 509l; E270: 540l).
So you can't say that the 607 is better than mercedes in his category.
I'd buy the Benz and spend the remaining 2.412 € for aftermarket parts and a proper engine chip tuning.
(Chip tuning for a Diesel costs around 1.000 € and delivers up to 20% more
performance wich will make the MB way faser than the 607).
Or just spend 45.124 € for a E 320 CDI and outperform the 607 V6 HDi
or spend 46.690 € and get a E 350 wich outperforms the 607 V6 210.
I can't believe i needed so much time to show that the 607 ain't better than a E-Class?
But what the hell has the fuc**** 607 to do with this thread???
DAMN! JUST STOP TALKING BULLS***!
#edit
sorry for this off-topic session.
forza_autodelta
02-18-2005, 12:55 PM
héhé be cool man!for 42000 euros you have everything on the peugeot and nothing on the mercedes
man 430gt
02-18-2005, 01:21 PM
In looks the slr take hands down.
forza_autodelta
02-19-2005, 11:02 AM
that's true
jcp123
02-22-2005, 12:50 AM
AMG for me please. The SLR is kinda ugly to me.
forza_autodelta
02-22-2005, 01:11 AM
AMG for me please. The SLR is kinda ugly to me.
it's a supercar with a particular design
jcp123
02-22-2005, 01:16 AM
I know, I just don't like it. Supercars aren't my thing anyway.
andy.muc
02-22-2005, 06:09 AM
héhé be cool man!for 42000 euros you have everything on the peugeot and nothing on the mercedes
Errm... nope. You're wrong. I know what i'm talking about. ;)