-
[QUOTE=Fleet 500]I can save you the trouble...
There was a real threat of communism taking over Nicaragua. The U.S. stepped in and prevented that from happening. That's why people like the one I quoted said "Thank you" to Ronald Reagan.[/QUOTE]
I like the trouble. Makes the answer worth having.
-
[QUOTE=Fleet 500]Why can't you just say "Yes" and stop there instead of dissecting every word? :)[/QUOTE]
Because the words are dead and they stink and we need to know what killed them.
-
[QUOTE=crisis]Because the words are dead and they stink and we need to know what killed them.[/QUOTE]
I like how other people answer posts not directed to them. ;)
I would reply what you posted, but I have no idea what you're talking about. :confused:
-
[QUOTE=crisis]I like the trouble. Makes the answer worth having.[/QUOTE]
Since you didn't challenge what I posted, I guess you accept it (a wise decision since it's true).
-
[QUOTE=Fleet 500]I like how other people answer posts not directed to them. ;) [/QUOTE]
Come on Fleet, it's a public bulletin board system.
If we only wanted private chats we coudl all stay on messenger or e-mails.
3rd person viewpoints are useful when 2 are locked in "struggle" :)
-
[QUOTE=Fleet 500]Since you didn't challenge what I posted, I guess you accept it (a wise decision since it's true).[/QUOTE]
Like most of your points , you guess too much. ;)
-
[QUOTE=crisis]Like most of your points , you guess too much. ;)[/QUOTE]
Then what would your answer be?
-
[QUOTE=Matra et Alpine]Come on Fleet, it's a public bulletin board system.
[/QUOTE]
It's funny, though, how many people answer a question directed at someone else before the person it was intended for responds himself.
-
[QUOTE=Fleet 500]Then what would your answer be?[/QUOTE]
[I]Since you didn't challenge what I posted, I guess you accept it (a wise decision since it's true).[/I]
No.
-
[QUOTE=Fleet 500]It's funny, though, how many people answer a question directed at someone else before the person it was intended for responds himself.[/QUOTE]
It may have something to do with how many people see flaws in your arguments.
-
I think Fleet deserves a little more credit than most of us give him. At least he's got the patience to defend his side (alone) as we press past 30 pages.
Anyway, back to the arguments:
Given the fact that socialism was irrefutably not "a threat" to vast majority of the population in Nicaragua (and was welcomed instead), how do you respond?
-
[QUOTE=Egg Nog]I think Fleet deserves a little more credit than most of us give him. At least he's got the patience to defend his side (alone) as we press past 30 pages.
[/QUOTE]
And arguing three different points at the same time. :)
-
[QUOTE=Egg Nog]I think Fleet deserves a little more credit than most of us give him. At least he's got the [B]patience[/B] to defend his side (alone) as we press past 30 pages.[/QUOTE]I think you have a point, but personally I'd replace the emboldened word with almost any one [URL=http://thesaurus.reference.com/search?q=fanaticism][i]these[/i][/URL].
:)
*puts on flame retardant suit*
*stands waaaaaaaay back*
-
Obstinance?
*Doesn't care*
-
[QUOTE=crisis]And arguing three different points at the same time. :)[/QUOTE]
Yeah, it can get confusing. :D