i'm wondering why he was banned and how long his ban was.
if a mod want's to deleate this cause they don't think it should be here, go right ahead.
Printable View
i'm wondering why he was banned and how long his ban was.
if a mod want's to deleate this cause they don't think it should be here, go right ahead.
[QUOTE=Karrmann]i'm wondering why he was banned and how long his ban was.
if a mod want's to deleate this cause they don't think it should be here, go right ahead.[/QUOTE]
He was banned for an enourmous disrespect in something he wrote directed to a very friendly, nice an long term member.
I was the first to tell him he had crossed the line, so thank god he's gonne.
That's it. No more explanations needed, I guess.
bad joke bad time wrong people very very wrong joke i think matt knows "he knows all"
what i think: "ukc has grown taste of hate and disrespect against most of people on here"
He was not banned for any joke.
disrespect? thats all i think is it? tell us how im not worried
[QUOTE=cuntukimushroom]disrespect? thats all i think is it? tell us how im not worried[/QUOTE]
He was banned for repeatedly ignoring the suggestions and warnings regarding his sig (don't go searching, it has been changed).
bad idea. thanks matt, sorry to be a bother.
[QUOTE=cuntukimushroom]bad idea. thanks matt, sorry to be a bother.[/QUOTE]
Didn't bother me...
oh, its just i think your typing is stressful.:);)
Guess we all can learn something from this, Bad idea going half cocked about something :p
yeah dont have rude sigs! that could be in 50 most worst decisions on sky one, micheal jackson came in number 11. Number one was just a waste of money
The mods and Wouter are usually pretty good about warning and explaining before a banishment. Wouter warned Jim last week that if he required moderation one more time, he would be banned. Just today, Wouter changed Jim's sig more than once with Jim changing it back in between Wouter's changes. I was asked by Wouter to relay a message to Jim through MSN that if he changed it one more time he would be banned. Jim promptly changed it and was immediately banned.
[QUOTE=cuntukimushroom]yeah dont have rude sigs! that could be in 50 most worst decisions on sky one, micheal jackson came in number 11. Number one was just a waste of money[/QUOTE]
No dont go off saying something before you know the hole story cause you might look like a cock with no hens :p
he made a complete bad decision, and ignoring wouters warning thats stupid. guess i cant have a sense of humour on this. Which is a good thing. yer i agree, now i understand and agree strongly. Plus i have learnt something out of this which cannot be re-done.
I have a great sence of humor, As a matter of fact i am a total dick,,, But i know limits and i wont cross them.