-
Interestingly, all five cars are owned by the same person, who wanted to know how fast they are. The whole story can be read in Sport Auto, in German...The owner seems to have more exotics, so there is more to follow.
-
[QUOTE=Ferrer;853325]It's not perfect, but what would you rather have?
The Enzo? Nope, I'm sorry if you consider the Zonda a mess the Enzo is downright ugly. And it has a stupid gearbox. And the interior is nowhere near the Zonda's...
The Murcielago? Mmmm... I like it but germans have tamed the raging bull just a little bit too much. Also it needs to lose some weight. And four wheel drive.
The Zonda [I]is[/I] the one.[/QUOTE]
Koenigsegg is far better in every way compared to all these other inferior cars. It has a wing now, so the stig shouldnt have problems keeping it on the track. These other pathetic excuses for "supercars" should take some lessons from Koenigsegg.
-
*sneezes*
I'm alergic fanboism.
-
dont be mad that they crush lambo's. and dont spell boy with an i. Makes you look like a tard
-
-
[QUOTE=Bavarian_Power;854532]Koenigsegg is far better in every way compared to all these other inferior cars. It has a wing now, so the stig shouldnt have problems keeping it on the track. These other pathetic excuses for "supercars" should take some lessons from Koenigsegg.[/QUOTE]
Contrary to popular belief, Top Gear is not the be-all and end-all of automotive performance.
-
agreed.
Who can touch its top speed?
Looks are not importaint, everyone likes diff things. Although the car is sexy.
Koenigsegg doesnt need more than a v-8 to make over 1000 hp.
It weighs 2800lbs roughly.
End
-
The Koenigsegg is too heavy IMHO.
-
are you crazy? 2800lbs and over 1k hp.
Smoke some more crack and shut up
-
[QUOTE=Bavarian_Power;854546]agreed.
Who can touch its top speed?
Looks are not importaint, everyone likes diff things. Although the car is sexy.
Koenigsegg doesnt need more than a v-8 to make over 1000 hp.
It weighs 2800lbs roughly.
End[/QUOTE]
seriously.... who cares about top speed? 14 year old boys? i know i did when i was 14.
i dont now. when i was 14 the F1 held those honors. how has the game advanced, 6mph? really? i care about that why?
-
[QUOTE=Bavarian_Power;854532]Koenigsegg is far better in every way compared to all these other inferior cars. It has a wing now, so the stig shouldnt have problems keeping it on the track. These other pathetic excuses for "supercars" should take some lessons from Koenigsegg.[/QUOTE]
Ring Times
Final Times:
1. Maserati MC12 7:24.29
2. Pagani Zonda F 7:24.65
3. Ferrari Enzo 7:25.21
4. Porsche Carrera GT 7:28.71
5. Koenigsegg CCX 7:33.55
-
[QUOTE=cmcpokey;853582]not really tiny... just short.[/QUOTE]
That's what she said.
but in all seriousness, I'd take the Enzo. The Porsche would overwhelm me, the Koenigsegg needs a Top Gear wing (:D), the MC12 is merely a rebadge with no rear-windows, and the Zonda is too Teutonic for me. No, I like me my traction controls and fancy gadgets.
-
[QUOTE=Bavarian_Power;854551]are you crazy? 2800lbs and over 1k hp.
Smoke some more crack and shut up[/QUOTE]
Don't judge crackheads until you've tried crack yourself.
I'd much rather have a Lotus, Caterham, or Atom. Supercars are for posing in and the occasional backroad blitz. If I want to drive fast, I want simplicity with added lightness.
-
next time maybe they could use the CCXR Edition. I guess they had to use the bottom line version of the Koenigsegg to even out the playing field. I still stand by my previous statements.
-
can you even buy the CCXR yet?
i dunno, maybe they should have used the FXX then..
