Looks: Front-engine vs. mid-engine?

It still wouldn't have looked as good as the Gotte d'Eau, would it?

And if you don't like the Daytona, there's the Ghibli. ;)

[quote=Ferrer;977424]It still wouldn't have looked as good as the Gotte d'Eau, would it?

And if you don't like the Daytona, there's the Ghibli. ;)[/quote]

we will never know...

and there is the SM of course..but yes the Ghibli looks much better than a Daytona.

I like the Daytona.. but then, I had a Rover SD1 so I would.

[quote=henk4;977416]funny that you mention the Daytona, which in my book is one of the ugliest Ferraris ever made....[/quote]

I agree. Maybe it has a nice engine and layout, but the looks are all wrong.

[quote=Kitdy;977466]I agree. Maybe it has a nice engine and layout, but the looks are all wrong.[/quote]

Seconded. I never understood why they are worth so much. Maybe it drives well, but I'm sure the new Ferrari California drives well too. I don't think that's worth close to if not more than $200 large.

[quote=NSXType-R;977472]Seconded. I never understood why they are worth so much. Maybe it drives well, but I'm sure the new Ferrari California drives well too. I don't think that's worth close to if not more than $200 large.[/quote]
It doesn't drive well at all apparently. It feels like a truck, they say. And the gearbox explodes everytime you go for second, if it's cold.

But it was the last of a breed.

Mid-engined it looks nice from a side angle profile