-
[QUOTE=ashes2ashes]Ok..if you say so.. I guess it is all relative...But 190hp for a sports car as heavy as a Mustang isn't really much...[/QUOTE]
A) Thats almsot definitly not a GT, meaning it was a V6 Mustang.
B) The SVT '03 had 380 horsepower, and the stock GT had over 250.
EDIT: If you're going to talk about Mustang's, please talk about the right one, it helps by A) averting confusion, and B) diffusing what confusion there might have been. Recent Mustang's have always had a V6 version, but were not called a "Mustang GT".
EDIT2: Sorry, yeah, didn't see which one you were talking about.
-
[QUOTE=CdocZ]A) Thats almsot definitly not a GT, meaning it was a V6 Mustang.
B) The SVT '03 had 380 horsepower, and the stock GT had over 250.
EDIT: If you're going to talk about Mustang's, please talk about the right one, it helps by A) averting confusion, and B) diffusing what confusion there might have been. Recent Mustang's have always had a V6 version, but were not called a "Mustang GT".[/QUOTE]
Ermmmmmmm...... I already said the V6 Mustang not the GT and not the Cobra. Who are you and why can you not properly read a thread.... the V6 Mustang as I orginally stated was underpowered..Do u agree? Who was talking about the GT or the Cobra? Please fully read and understand a thread before you start criticising...
-
[QUOTE=ashes2ashes]Ermmmmmmm...... I already said the V6 Mustang not the GT and not the Cobra. Who are you and why can you not properly read a thread.... the V6 Mustang as I orginally stated was underpowered..Do u agree? Who was talking about the GT or the Cobra? Please fully read and understand a thread before you start criticising...[/QUOTE]
Oh sorry dude. Didn't see that. Also, seriously, if you are going to talk about not reading a thread correctly, do not act like the person is retarded. For all you know they could be dislexic, which I slightly am (side affect of my ADD). So thank you for the insult, next time think before you talk at all.
-
I'm sorry, I didn't mean it like that either.. I guess I just reacted because I thought you thught that I was ran idiot just saying stuff without checking my facts.. so I apologise to you too..
-
You are based in MD? Where abouts?
-
Theres just something about the Prowler...screw the fact that the engine is crappy. It looks so mean, and has the real 12 year old bedroom poster look about it.
-
The SSR becasue it's hideous. I quite like the Prowler on looks
-
Never liked the looks of the Prowler. It's just trying too hard.
-
the plymouth. It looks like an oversized toothbrush!
-
The Howler (v8) vs. SSR would be better comparison, I really dont understand how you guys can think the chevy is worse! Its actually kinda fast!
-
[QUOTE=MrBikerMan]The Howler (v8) vs. SSR would be better comparison, I really dont understand how you guys can think the chevy is worse! Its actually kinda fast![/QUOTE]post a link to the howler please
-
[QUOTE=targa]post a link to the howler please[/QUOTE]
It's only a concept and looks realllly similar to the Prowler.
-
Oops didnt know it was concept. The prowler probably wouldnt even be in this comparo if it had a v8 ever in production. Imagine if plymouth plopped a viper engine in it, it would probably be being talked about as a supercar instead of a joke.
Here's a link I found. Id never actually seen it before this, just heard that it was a prowler with a v8, but shit that ass is hideous!!!!!
[url]http://www.geocities.com/ph_armstrong/Vehicles/Howler.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.prowlerexcitement.com/Howler/Howler.html[/url]
-
prowlers. they physically disgust me
-
I think the Prowler is lamer, I really dislike the looks of it.
The SSR, although a little slower than its looks and hype would suggest, is actually not bad looking and along with the Ford Thunderbird might be the only "retro" (gawd I hate that word) styled car that I think looks at least decent (to say nothing of good looking). I also dig the top on the SSR.