-
[QUOTE=fpv_gtho]Thanks. I'll keep working at it, trying to make it not look so "basic", but i think its going to take CAD until it starts looking professional.[/QUOTE]
your ideas are progressing well. Keep at it. Multi link is a good idea but is a very different method. You can achieve the relative compactness of multi-link (the rx-8) has multi link so maybe hes biased...kidding:D ) using an "in wheel" design like the s2000:
[IMG]http://www.spoonsports.us/catalog/s2000/suspension/006_01.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.s2000.com/s2k/frsus.gif[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.s2000.com/s2k/resus.gif[/IMG]
just some ideas, not really sure what you can make of this..:)
edit: come to think of it the rx8 has doublewishbones and multilink
-
[QUOTE=fpv_gtho]Heres an attempt at a 3 sided view for the suspension. As it stands, its become a 5 link setup. Still to integrate anti roll bars etc.[/QUOTE]
Are you sure you don't want to stick with something like a simple unequal length double A arm?
-
1 Attachment(s)
Ok heres a revised design with Matra's suggestion.
Also, ive taken the liberty to track down some "rival" GT dimensions, in a hope it'll help us decide the dimensions of our car and kick start some other areas.
Vanquish S:
Length: 4665 mm
Width: 1923 mm
Height: 1318 mm
Kerb weight: 1875 kgs
Wheelbase: 2690 mm
Boot space: 0.24 cu. m
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres
Continental GT
Kerbweight 2385kg 5258 Ib
Gross Vehicle Weight 2800kg 6170 Ib
Boot Volume 370L 0.37m³ / (13.1 cu.ft)
Fuel Tank Capacity 90L 19.8 Gallons / 23.8 US Gallons
Overall Length 4804mm 189.13 in
Width across body 1916mm 75.43 in
Width across mirrors 2102mm 82.76 in
Height 1390mm 54.72 in
Wheel Base 2745mm 108.07 in
Turning Circle (kerb to kerb) 11200mm 440.94 in
Front Leg-room 1075mm 42.32 in
Rear Leg-room 766mm 30.16 in
612 Scaglietti
Overal Length 193 in
Overall width 77 in
Height 52.9 in
Wheelbase 116.1 in
Front track 66.5 in
Rear track 64.6
Dry weight 3803 lbs
Kerb weight 4056 lbs
Fuel capacity 23.7 gal (28.5 US gal)
M6 coupe
Kerb weight 1785kg
Overal Length 4871mm
Wheelbase 2871mm
Front track 1587mm
Rear track 1584mm
Height 1372mm
CL55 AMG
Wheelbase (mm) 2885
Length (mm) 4993
Width (mm) 1857
Height (mm) 1398
Kerb weight (kg) 1920
Permissible gross weight (kg) 2420
Fuel tank capacity (l) 88
-
[QUOTE=jediali]your ideas are progressing well. Keep at it. Multi link is a good idea but is a very different method. You can achieve the relative compactness of multi-link (the rx-8) has multi link so maybe hes biased...kidding:D ) using an "in wheel" design like the s2000:
[IMG]http://www.spoonsports.us/catalog/s2000/suspension/006_01.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.s2000.com/s2k/frsus.gif[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.s2000.com/s2k/resus.gif[/IMG]
just some ideas, not really sure what you can make of this..:)
edit: come to think of it the rx8 has doublewishbones and multilink[/QUOTE]
I'll be looking at wishbones for the front probably, as well as a forward mounted steering rack but thanks for the pictures.
[QUOTE=hightower99]Are you sure you don't want to stick with something like a simple unequal length double A arm?[/QUOTE]
Well ive had my mind set on the longitudinal links, but i also figured the multilinks would be lighter than an A/H arm setup. I guess its also not too hard to go to A/H arms at this stage either.
-
I have the perfect way to come up with a full team.
HOW TO PROPERLY PLACE NEW EMPLOYEES
1. Put 400 bricks in a closed room.
2. Put your new hires in the room and close the door.
3. Leave them alone and come back after 6 hours.
4. Then analyze the situation:
a. If they are counting the bricks, put them in the Accounting Department.
b. If they are recounting them, put them in Auditing.
c. If they have messed up the whole place with the bricks, put them in Engineering.
d. If they are arranging the bricks in some strange order, put them in Planning.
e. If they are throwing the bricks at each other, put them in Operations.
f. If they are sleeping, put them in Security.
g. If they have broken the bricks into pieces, put them in Information Technology.
h. If they are sitting idle, put them in Human Resources.
i. If they say they have tried different combinations, they are looking for more, yet not a brick has been moved, put them in Sales.
j. If they have already left for the day, put them in Marketing.
k. If they are staring out of the window, put them in Strategic Planning.
l. If they are talking to each other, and not a single brick has been >moved, congratulate them and put them in Top Management .
Finally, if they have surrounded themselves with bricks in such a way that they can neither be seen nor heard from, put them in Congress.
My dad sent it to me. :D
-
[QUOTE=aNOBLEman]I have the perfect way to come up with a full team.
HOW TO PROPERLY PLACE NEW EMPLOYEES
1. Put 400 bricks in a closed room.
2. Put your new hires in the room and close the door.
3. Leave them alone and come back after 6 hours.
4. Then analyze the situation:
a. If they are counting the bricks, put them in the Accounting Department.
b. If they are recounting them, put them in Auditing.
c. If they have messed up the whole place with the bricks, put them in Engineering.
d. If they are arranging the bricks in some strange order, put them in Planning.
e. If they are throwing the bricks at each other, put them in Operations.
f. If they are sleeping, put them in Security.
g. If they have broken the bricks into pieces, put them in Information Technology.
h. If they are sitting idle, put them in Human Resources.
i. If they say they have tried different combinations, they are looking for more, yet not a brick has been moved, put them in Sales.
j. If they have already left for the day, put them in Marketing.
k. If they are staring out of the window, put them in Strategic Planning.
l. If they are talking to each other, and not a single brick has been >moved, congratulate them and put them in Top Management .
Finally, if they have surrounded themselves with bricks in such a way that they can neither be seen nor heard from, put them in Congress.
My dad sent it to me. :D[/QUOTE]
Hilarious :D
-
[QUOTE=jediali]your ideas are progressing well. Keep at it. Multi link is a good idea but is a very different method. You can achieve the relative compactness of multi-link (the rx-8) has multi link so maybe hes biased...kidding:D ) using an "in wheel" design like the s2000:
[IMG]http://www.spoonsports.us/catalog/s2000/suspension/006_01.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.s2000.com/s2k/frsus.gif[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.s2000.com/s2k/resus.gif[/IMG]
just some ideas, not really sure what you can make of this..:)
edit: come to think of it the rx8 has doublewishbones and multilink[/QUOTE]
if you get me high q pictures of that spring setup I can begin creating a working 3d image.
-
well thats about as detailed as i can find on the open web. anyone else got pics? It would be good for the suspension to actually work! It would be a shame to just plain copy someone elses design. I dont intend my contribution to go along those lines:)
-
1 Attachment(s)
Did a montage of a skemathic found on another post just to get a view, what do you guys think? Changes?
-
RWD? i still like all. but id take rear over front, but you guys can figure that out, just so you know id like to know soon, so i can start designing a little, front engine, mid or rear?
-
[quote=ruim20;667996]Did a montage of a skemathic found on another post just to get a view, what do you guys think? Changes?[/quote]
turn the engine around :D
EDIT: Also ..... don't need that much leg room in the rear.
It's a GT not a Maybach :D
-
-
Yes, basically rear seats have to be much smaller, other than that a good start.
-
[QUOTE=ruim20;667996]Did a montage of a skemathic found on another post just to get a view, what do you guys think? Changes?[/QUOTE]
The wheelbase looks to be much too big.
The occupants are too low and too laid back - driving the cabin length up, and therefore the wheelbase.
The windscreen is too far forward, too shallow, and it is also curved, so it is a big lens.
The guy in the back doesn't need a steering wheel either.
-
i feel ignored... noone answered my question...